• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

CHOKE? WE DON'T NEED NO STINKING CHOKE!!!!!!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter D.Hearne
  • Start date Start date Jan 3, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 3, 2008
#1
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #1
Ok, maybe not a classic Stang, but it is related. It's 26*F outside here in south Louisiana. I just went out to fire up the 89 V8 Ranger to drive to work. Motor is a carbed Explorer equivalent roller 5.0, topped with a Ford Racing A321 intake and a Holley 570 Street Avenger carb.(bought used off ebay) Cam in this motor is the Explorer's F4TE roller (256/266 advertised duration, .445/.473 lift with 1.7 Cobra rockers) Heads are ported 7's. Stock shortblock from a rolled 93 E150 van. No choke whatsoever on the Holley, that was the first thing I removed when I pulled it out of the shipping box. I just went out, and cranked the engine about 2 seconds without ever touching the gas pedal. Motor fired right off and it idled with out ever touching the pedal. I think the cam here is the secret, it's wide LSA lets it pull a strong vacuum signal right off the bat to help the carb circuits work. Ignition is a stock points distributor fitted with a Crane XR-1 unit, Mallory Promaster coil, Ford Racing 9mm wires, small to large cap adapter, large post type cap(Standard/Blue Streak blue cap w/brass terminals) Autolite stock plugs for E7 heads. Who says you need a choke in cold weather?
 

mrmustangman357

Member
Feb 11, 2007
763
3
18
Jan 3, 2008
#2
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #2
i do j/k

it amazes me how many people when they think of "no choke" they instantly think "race carb." In reality, most people drive their cars above 50 degrees F and never even need a choke. For me, it makes fast idle convenient for engine warmups before driving (in summer of course)
 
D

DJCarbine

New Member
May 4, 2005
392
0
0
Jan 3, 2008
#3
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #3
I pulled the choke off the edelbrock 4105 I got in the mail as soon as it was out of the package. I start it up in 10 degree weather here in chicago just fine, takes some cranking but it fires up.

Only gets hard if it starts to catch and you flood it by accident, takes forever to get it going then
 
6

68conv4sp

New Member
Oct 24, 2005
270
0
0
Jan 3, 2008
#4
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #4
D Hearne, I don't know if my thinking is sound on this, but when I used to use the choke on my Edel carb, the car fired faster but went immediately to a high idle (1600+rpm). This can't be good for a stone cold motor. I prefer to let it crank for 8-10 sec to build a little oil pressure and then it fires smoothly and holds about 850 rpm. Do you think that 8-10 sec of cold cranking is harmful in any way?
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jan 3, 2008
#5
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #5
D. Hearne, where are you at in LA?
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Jan 3, 2008
#6
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #6
68conv4sp said:
D Hearne, I don't know if my thinking is sound on this, but when I used to use the choke on my Edel carb, the car fired faster but went immediately to a high idle (1600+rpm). This can't be good for a stone cold motor. I prefer to let it crank for 8-10 sec to build a little oil pressure and then it fires smoothly and holds about 850 rpm. Do you think that 8-10 sec of cold cranking is harmful in any way?
Click to expand...

There is no benefit whatsoever to crank it 8-10 sec to build a little oil pressure before firing. Running 1600rpm cold start is no big deal at all. If it was a problem, they would never make a fast idle linkage, and it just doesn't make any sense anyway. You are building more oil pressure at 1600rpm than you are at 850rpm. Cranking 8-10 sec is a long time and can be harmful to your starter, wearing it out faster, and will put a little more wear on your charging system from all that juice taken from over cranking.
 
6

68conv4sp

New Member
Oct 24, 2005
270
0
0
Jan 3, 2008
#7
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #7
Good point. I suppose it takes the same number of total revolutions to push a given volume of oil thru, whether it is at 850 or 1600rpms. The additonal wear of the starter/charging system is probably unnecessary.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jan 3, 2008
#8
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #8
also slightly higher idle speeds help the oil move better when it's cold, this is especially helpful if you use a high viscosity oil like the 20w50 i use. i always let the engine run for a couple minutes before i drive the stang. on my 86 towncar i use 10w30 and can start driving within 20 seconds of starting the car, of course it helps that it's EFI too.
 

mrmustangman357

Member
Feb 11, 2007
763
3
18
Jan 3, 2008
#9
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #9
on a cold motor with thicker oil (20w-50) i would prefer less rpm as there is much less load at idle and allows the oil to start circulating and warm before higher rpms get reached. just my preference. at idle, as long as there is pressure reading on the gauge, oil is moving
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jan 3, 2008
#10
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #10
It was single digits this morning and the EFI 302 in my '83 fired up with no problems. I agree that a choke is not needed.
 
7

73nancy

New Member
Sep 9, 2007
27
0
0
Jan 3, 2008
#11
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #11
is your ranger a 4x4 by the way off topic i know. i was thinking of doing a v8 conversion in my 92 4x4 some day but herd it was tricky..
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 3, 2008
#12
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #12
Stanger007 said:
D. Hearne, where are you at in LA?
Click to expand...

I'm west of you, over in Opelousas.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 3, 2008
#13
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #13
68conv4sp said:
D Hearne, I don't know if my thinking is sound on this, but when I used to use the choke on my Edel carb, the car fired faster but went immediately to a high idle (1600+rpm). This can't be good for a stone cold motor. I prefer to let it crank for 8-10 sec to build a little oil pressure and then it fires smoothly and holds about 850 rpm. Do you think that 8-10 sec of cold cranking is harmful in any way?
Click to expand...

I'd say it depends on what weight oil you're running. Thinner would be fine going to high idle, thicker? I'd let it warm some before reving it. 8-10 seconds of cranking would only cause wear on the starter, but even that would be hard to prove. If it sounded like it was laboring to crank it, yea, that wouldn't be good. If it had no trouble in cranking, it would harm nothing.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 3, 2008
#14
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #14
73nancy said:
is your ranger a 4x4 by the way off topic i know. i was thinking of doing a v8 conversion in my 92 4x4 some day but herd it was tricky..
Click to expand...

Mine's a 2wd. It's had a V8 now for 6 years, with 5 different engine combos. All those were when I was playing with it, since then, it's been relegated to daily driver status and detuned from the 331- sixpack motor it had. The 331 is now in my 77 Comet drag car-toy. The tricky part of a 4x4 conversion is you're limited in engine placement, unless you relocate or replace the transfer case. There are two sites I post in: www.therangerstation.com and www.rangerpowersports.com The TRS site is geared more toward 4x4's.
 
7

73nancy

New Member
Sep 9, 2007
27
0
0
Jan 4, 2008
#15
  • Jan 4, 2008
  • #15
ok thanxs a bunch sounds like a nice ride
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jan 4, 2008
#16
  • Jan 4, 2008
  • #16
D.Hearne said:
I'm west of you, over in Opelousas.
Click to expand...

Ah ha, do you make it to State Capitol Dragway very often?

I'll be headed back in February once they finish reconcreting up to the eighth mile (they shut down early Dec for it).

Wes
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 5, 2008
#17
  • Jan 5, 2008
  • #17
Stanger007 said:
Ah ha, do you make it to State Capitol Dragway very often?

I'll be headed back in February once they finish reconcreting up to the eighth mile (they shut down early Dec for it).

Wes
Click to expand...

Yea, the Comet ought to be ready to try again by then. I also want to run the Ranger at least once with the motor that's in it. It won't be as fast as it was with the 331 but I'm just curious as to how quick it is with this motor. Pics of the Comet are on my photobucket page http://s125.photobucket.com/albums/p53/baddad457/
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Jan 5, 2008
#18
  • Jan 5, 2008
  • #18
I have no choke on my Edelbrock and it starts up just fine. It's the keeping it running that is alittle tricky. I doesnt like to idle right away but with my converter I can drive it right at the rpm I would have it running at in park anyhow.
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Jan 5, 2008
#19
  • Jan 5, 2008
  • #19
OK, so there's enough evidence to indicate a choke is not absolutely necessary, but I wonder how much it really costs performance wise?

The Melvin part of my brain insisted that I make the heat stove choke on my OEM 735 Holley functional, if for no other reason than to look stock. I have a Quickfuel 750 that has a smoothed entry and no provision for a choke that I could swap on at the track, but I doubt I will realize any improvement any time soon. I can't take advantage of the power I already have on a road course.

I haven't taken the car to a drag strip since I put the 408 in because 1) it's set up for road racing not drag racing and 2) it doesn't even have a roll bar much less a cage and I was afraid I would twist the sheet metal.

So the question is "how much did you gain by removing the choke?" If you made other changes at the same time, 'fess up so we get a clear picture of what no choke was worth. After I get my roll bar welded in I plan to swap the wheels and tires, change the settings on the shocks and take it down the 1320 just to see what it can do.
 

DarkoStoj

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2002
929
13
39
Detroit
Jan 5, 2008
#20
  • Jan 5, 2008
  • #20
who said 26* is cold
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
D
Carb Spitting
  • daer0
  • May 16, 2021
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
14
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 28, 2021
7991LXnSHO
Giving the bird... new brains.
  • slipkid269
  • Jun 25, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2021
CarMichael Angelo
Progress Thread 1/4 mile guess?
  • 78mIIman
  • Oct 16, 2019
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
8
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jan 14, 2020
Adieu
Engine Intermittent Spark, no start
  • 1978Cobra2
  • Jan 22, 2019
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
3K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 25, 2019
2Blue2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?