• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Clutch Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter unrealmach1
  • Start date Start date Jun 10, 2007

unrealmach1

New Member
Dec 22, 2005
89
0
0
Detroit, MI
Jun 10, 2007
#1
  • Jun 10, 2007
  • #1
Anyone know of a stock diaphram clucth kit that I could get from someplace like Autozone that would fit a '68 302? I thought the flywheel (157t) would fit 10 or 10.5? Would something form like an '80's mustang or bronco fit? I am converting from FMX to a T-5Z ( t-5 bellhousing) with the JMC Hydrualic Clutch. I looked at a pressure plate from a '93 mustang, but the bolt pattern is different on my flywheel.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Jun 10, 2007
#2
  • Jun 10, 2007
  • #2
The bolt patern should NOT be different on your flywheel. As far as I know all small block Ford v8s have the same bolt patern on the crank. They are however positioned in such a way that you can only put the flywheel on in one spot. This is to keep the ballance wieght on the flywheel in the correct possition.

That being said, if you put a 5.0 flywheel on an early 302 you are going to have ISSUES. The late model 5.0 motors use a 50oz imballance while the early motors use a 23oz (I or maybe 24oz ?) imballance. If you use the wrong imballance your motor will be out of ballance and vibrate it self to pieces.

You can have a machine shop reballance the flywheel to the correct imballance if you want to use a 5.0 flywheel on an early motor.

In 1985 or 1986 (I can't remember) Ford went to a 10.5 inch clutch and this style clutch uses dowl pins to locate the pressure plate. You will know the difference when you see the two flywheels.

I would recomend a king cobra clutch. It will bolt onto your 5.0 flywheel and its got good holding power with a reduced pedal effort. Careful when you go to buy one. People call everything a "king cobra" clutch these days. The actually one is manufactured by Valeo. If they say its a king cobra clutch and it doesn't say Valeo on it, then its not a real king cobra clutch. It may be just as good but it isn't the real deal.
 
R

ron67fb

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,117
0
36
SF Bay area, CA
Jun 10, 2007
#3
  • Jun 10, 2007
  • #3
I believe he's talking about the pressure plate bolt pattern, not the crank.

unrealmach1, you mentioned your flywheel yet you also say you're converting from FMX. Do you already have a replacement flywheel? I assume then it is a 1968 flywheel, which is what you tried to match the '93 pressure plate with?

The long-style and late-model diaphragm are indeed different bolt patterns. I bought a Centerforce clutch which is a diaphragm but with the Long bolt pattern. The price was very similar to a replacement HD clutch kit from Ford, Summit, etc. If you already have a '68 flywheel and don't want the hassle of re-balancing a late-model flywheel then that is the way to go. This was years ago so I don't know what else is available now. I think there are now flywheels drilled for both patterns.

Looking at the Summit clutch page, narrowed down to pre-73 302 engines there are both Long and Diaphragm clutches available. Don't go by the pictures, as some picture a diaphragm yet say "Long" in the product description.
http://store.summitracing.com/egnse...94925083+4294908282+4294840126+115+4294787402

Here's their lowest-priced diaphragm option:
http://store.summitracing.com/partd...908282+4294840126+4294787402+115&autoview=sku
 

unrealmach1

New Member
Dec 22, 2005
89
0
0
Detroit, MI
Jun 10, 2007
#4
  • Jun 10, 2007
  • #4
Thanks for the help guys.

The pressure plate bolt pattern is what I was talking about. I have a flywheel from a 289 out of a '68 mustang so I wanted to use that flywheel. I was just trying to find clutch set for < $100. When I looked at Summit the Zoom clutch didn't come up for me. The cheapest I found was the Ram for $135 and that is without the pilot bearing, so with everything including shipping I would be at around $160. $116 with the bearing will work for me though I wouldn't trust the descriptions at Summit all the time. I have bought things that have the wrong descriptions on their website. I bought the Unisteer rack for my '69 and it said it was chrome, but it was black when I got it. They told me they take their part number from the manufacturer and to check with the manufactures for a correct description. But @ $575 for a rack who complains? Again thanks for the help guys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Need some info on putting a 2002 4.6l in a 1997 gt.
  • Austin4.6l
  • May 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
147
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2025
Austin4.6l
A
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
331
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
951
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
639
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
683
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?