• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

cold engine ? and ect sensor index

  • Thread starter Thread starter DDSTANG94
  • Start date Start date May 2, 2009

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
May 2, 2009
#1
  • May 2, 2009
  • #1
does the ECT sensor need to be indexed or put in a certain amount?

also what can cause poor performance when the motor is cold, here is what has been replaced

ECT
O2's
tune up

what eles could cuase problems? the problems im experiencing are at low rpms when the motor is cold it feels like the timming is retarded and skips a little bit, then when it hits like 3k it comes alive and starts pulling harder, like i said it does it when its cold out and the motor is cold
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
May 3, 2009
#2
  • May 3, 2009
  • #2
common guys ??
 

cjones

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
1,561
0
37
Avondale, AZ
May 3, 2009
#3
  • May 3, 2009
  • #3
IAT (Intake Air Temp) - if that shows warm air coming in then it could cause problems. when you replaced the ECT you replaced the coolant sensor with 2 wires, right??

have you run codes??
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
May 5, 2009
#4
  • May 5, 2009
  • #4
cjones said:
IAT (Intake Air Temp) - if that shows warm air coming in then it could cause problems. when you replaced the ECT you replaced the coolant sensor with 2 wires, right??

have you run codes??
Click to expand...

ok is the IAT different from the ACT? when i replacet the ect i only did the one that treads in the intake fitting.....and yes but no codes came up
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
May 5, 2009
#5
  • May 5, 2009
  • #5
IAT and ACT perform the same function. They both measure the temp of the intake charge. Fox III's (with intake mounted sensors) generally are called ACT's. Cars with the sensor in the air inlet tract seem to be called IAT.

The ECT is the coolant sensor for the EEC.

You dont index an ECT.

You dont have to index an IAT but I do (I put the support posts at 12 and 6 o'clock so nothing blocks the bulb).
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
May 5, 2009
#6
  • May 5, 2009
  • #6
HISSIN50 said:
IAT and ACT perform the same function. They both measure the temp of the intake charge. Fox III's (with intake mounted sensors) generally are called ACT's. Cars with the sensor in the air inlet tract seem to be called IAT.

The ECT is the coolant sensor for the EEC.

You dont index an ECT.

You dont have to index an IAT but I do (I put the support posts at 12 and 6 o'clock so nothing blocks the bulb).
Click to expand...

ok thanks, any thoughts on what my problem could be?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
May 5, 2009
#7
  • May 5, 2009
  • #7
Have you checked codes and the calibration of the ECT?
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
May 5, 2009
#8
  • May 5, 2009
  • #8
From reading the posts I don't get a clear picture that the OP knows where the ECT is located. It appears that he's confusing it with the IAT (ACT). The ECT is located on the passenger side lower intake manifold and has a two wire connector. The coolant sensor on the driver's is the one for the dash gauge and has a single wire.
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
May 6, 2009
#9
  • May 6, 2009
  • #9
HISSIN50 said:
Have you checked codes and the calibration of the ECT?
Click to expand...

no codes, the ect is brand new motorcrafter
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
May 6, 2009
#10
  • May 6, 2009
  • #10
Being new doesnt mean good, nor does it mean the sensor is calibrated. You just gotta test it (I would ohm out a new sensor before installing it, just for the sake of doing so). With it on the car, I'd check the signal reading instead - since that takes the voltage to the sensor into account.
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
May 15, 2009
#11
  • May 15, 2009
  • #11
HISSIN50 said:
Being new doesnt mean good, nor does it mean the sensor is calibrated. You just gotta test it (I would ohm out a new sensor before installing it, just for the sake of doing so). With it on the car, I'd check the signal reading instead - since that takes the voltage to the sensor into account.
Click to expand...

iv had two new ect's on there, how exactly do i check it
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
May 15, 2009
#12
  • May 15, 2009
  • #12
The IAT is scaled the same as the ECT.

ECT values
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
May 15, 2009
#13
  • May 15, 2009
  • #13
IAT sensor = Intake Air Temperature sensor = ACT sensor = Air Charge Temperature sensor (located in airpipe between MAF and TB)
ECT sensor = Engine Coolant Temperature sensor (located on passenger side of intake manifold, screwed into heater tube assembly and has 2-wire connector)
Coolant temp. gauge sending unit is located on the driver's side of the intake manifold and has a single-wire connector.

The engine needs a richer A/F mixture and more timing advance when it's cold, so the ACT and ECT sensors are very important during the engine warm-up phase. If there's a short in the wiring to either of them (or a short inside the sensor itself), the voltage across the sensor wires will be near to zero volts (too low) and the engine computer will think that the engine's hot, retarding the timing and leaning out the A/F mixture causing cold driveability problems. I suspect your problem lies there. A short in the ECT sensor wiring will usually cause the electric fan to stay on constantly while the engine's running.
If either of the sensors themselves goes bad, the result is usually the opposite (voltage across the sensor wires near 5.0v reference, engine runs rich but otherwise pretty well during the warm-up phase).
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
May 15, 2009
#14
  • May 15, 2009
  • #14
IIRC, as IAT and ECT values increase (towards VREF), the indicated temperature is lower, not higher.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
May 15, 2009
#15
  • May 15, 2009
  • #15
You're quite right Hissin. Thanks. I've corrected my last post.
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
May 15, 2009
#16
  • May 15, 2009
  • #16
so is it possibly it is the IAT or more likely the ect
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
May 15, 2009
#17
  • May 15, 2009
  • #17
DDSTANG94 said:
so is it possibly it is the IAT or more likely the ect
Click to expand...

The ECT is more important IMHO.

But test both. It will take just a minute to test each. I do them at room temp and then at operating temp. Those are two critical temps and are spread wide apart. If both are copacetic, I can assume any interpolations or extrapolations will be copacetic.
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
May 17, 2009
#18
  • May 17, 2009
  • #18
HISSIN50 said:
The IAT is scaled the same as the ECT.

ECT values
Click to expand...

ok so i tested the ECT at room temp in my house, about 70*. I put the meter at 200k ohms and got 22.7X so my sensor is no good? what should it read at that temp..did i do it write??
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
May 17, 2009
#19
  • May 17, 2009
  • #19
Seems a little off. It should have read somewhere near 38K Ohms. Was the bulb sitting in water that was room temp? I dont test the sensors in free air so I'm not sure if that could affect it.
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
May 18, 2009
#20
  • May 18, 2009
  • #20
HISSIN50 said:
Seems a little off. It should have read somewhere near 38K Ohms. Was the bulb sitting in water that was room temp? I dont test the sensors in free air so I'm not sure if that could affect it.
Click to expand...

no i tested it in the air, should i put it in water
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
1991 GT 5.0 running hot
  • gvanginkel403
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
154
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 2, 2026
General karthief
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
883
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
J
'96 Cobra: A/C gets weak and engine misfires under load when warm
  • jruhnke
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
2
Views
325
SVT Tech Forum Nov 20, 2025
nickyb
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
161
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
944
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?