• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Comp Cams installation... are they for real?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 68converted
  • Start date Start date Jan 22, 2008

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Jan 22, 2008
#1
  • Jan 22, 2008
  • #1
Per Comp cams: "On hydraulic and mechanical (solid) flat tappet cams that require dual valve springs, the inner spring must be removed during break-in. This allows the lifters to establish rotation and develop a good wear pattern.

Do these guys have any idea how difficult it is to take off the uppper Intake for an EFI car to "remove the inner springs" on my AFR 165 heads. I am not sure that I would want to mess with the $1200 heads to worry about a good wear pattern on a $100 cam (slightly used)

Can someone tell me if they are smoking the good stuff over at Comp Cams? Is this really nessesary?
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Jan 23, 2008
#2
  • Jan 23, 2008
  • #2
they say too much pressure on the lifters will cause them to not rotate. Personally, I don't buy it because the friction and pressure is what CAUSES the thing to rotate in the first place. They also caution reusing old springs because they are too weak and will cause failure from the lifter not rotating? Is there some kind of magical median? I don't know. It seems like a bunch of BS to me, and more like just a sentence to cover their own arses, but I don't know, I have never tried it.
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Jan 23, 2008
#3
  • Jan 23, 2008
  • #3
68converted said:
I am not sure that I would want to mess with the $1200 heads to worry about a good wear pattern on a $100 cam (slightly used)
Click to expand...

I wouldn't worry about it with a used cam. The cam is already married to the lifters that were originally used anyway. The chances of prematurely wearing the cam out are greatly increased since it's used. The best thing you could do is get a new cam and follow the installation instructions.

A used roller cam is one thing but I would avoid a used flat tappet cam.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 23, 2008
#4
  • Jan 23, 2008
  • #4
Flat tappets have been real ugly as of late and its all in the metal. I have called Comp on a Street rod engine I built that went through 2 274 Extreme flats, using a 986 spring. They don't use the same metal they used to. They even sell break in oil additive now to help prevent just such a thing. Its a PITA and its only a $100camshaft but they make alot of metal in the bottom end when they go bad.
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Jan 23, 2008
#5
  • Jan 23, 2008
  • #5
Well, I am just finally getting to the point of starting this beast up after two years and I am running through the 10,000 things I learned and forgot since I first started the project. I looked up an old PDF from them when I first thought I was going to start it up and funny... that paragraph is strangely missing????

I am not going to worry about it. And the cam had about 1500 miles on it, the PO jumped up to a 274. It did not have a single scratch on any of the lobes. So basically "new".

Thanks guys
 

Nicoleb3x3

Member
Jun 9, 2004
274
0
16
southern NH
Apr 15, 2009
#6
  • Apr 15, 2009
  • #6
Sorry to dig up this OLD thread, but I have the same question....is comp cams serious about removing the inner spring for break in? Seriously, what a PITA!!

I have a BRAND new cam..and BRAND NEW PARTS ALL AROUND in a new engine build....I want to listen to comp cam's "important message" but it just seems "stupid" to me...I can't see anyone other than my dumb ass actually doing the extra work.

appreciate anyones feedback if they bought a new cam and did or didn't do this proceedure and had dual springs....which I assume is common!
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Apr 15, 2009
#7
  • Apr 15, 2009
  • #7
Camshaft Break-in Procedure
Important: On hydraulic and mechanical (solid) flat tappet cams that require dual valve springs, the
inner spring must be removed during break-in. This allows the lifters to establish rotation and
develop a good wear pattern.
Click to expand...
This does not apply to a 5.0 with roller lifters. FWIW, I keep reading that the real problem with cam breakin is all the oils removing the zinc additives. Here's an interesting read from valvoline
http://www.valvoline.com/downloads/2008-003a.pdfGM engine oil supplement is also a good zinc additive. What I've been trying to learn is if the zinc is as necessary with a roller cam.
 

Nicoleb3x3

Member
Jun 9, 2004
274
0
16
southern NH
Apr 15, 2009
#8
  • Apr 15, 2009
  • #8
ohhhhhhhhh! I'm so happy now I don't have to go through all of that!

 

Nicoleb3x3

Member
Jun 9, 2004
274
0
16
southern NH
Apr 15, 2009
#9
  • Apr 15, 2009
  • #9
I keep reading that the real problem with cam breakin is all the oils removing the zinc additives. Here's an interesting read from valvoline
http://www.valvoline.com/downloads/2008-003a.pdfGM
Click to expand...

cool info! I would want to remind anyone that they better not use synthetic oil during cam or engine break-in!
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Apr 15, 2009
#10
  • Apr 15, 2009
  • #10
Nicoleb3x3 said:
cool info! I would want to remind anyone that they better not use synthetic oil during cam or engine break-in!
Click to expand...

While I agree with this, I'm curious about all the cars that come from the factory with synthetic oil.
 

Blown331LX

Member
Apr 5, 2005
227
0
16
Chapel Hill, NC
Apr 16, 2009
#11
  • Apr 16, 2009
  • #11
68converted said:
Per Comp cams: "On hydraulic and mechanical (solid) flat tappet cams that require dual valve springs, the inner spring must be removed during break-in. This allows the lifters to establish rotation and develop a good wear pattern.

Do these guys have any idea how difficult it is to take off the uppper Intake for an EFI car to "remove the inner springs" on my AFR 165 heads. I am not sure that I would want to mess with the $1200 heads to worry about a good wear pattern on a $100 cam (slightly used)

Can someone tell me if they are smoking the good stuff over at Comp Cams? Is this really nessesary?
Click to expand...



So wait, you have an EFI motor with a flat tappet cam??? If its an EFI setup why not just go with a full roller block, that way you have en engine that will turn up quicker and a more reliable valve train...
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Apr 16, 2009
#12
  • Apr 16, 2009
  • #12
LOL... funny how these threads come back up. I have a full roller block out of a 91 Cobra. The info on their site said that we should pull it apart and check for wear, whether it is a roller or flat tappet. I ran this info by a few shop owners last year, and they laughed their heads off. I think it's a CYA kind of thing>
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Apr 16, 2009
#13
  • Apr 16, 2009
  • #13
The old school Chevy guys on another board, (I also have a Chevelle) have had lots of probs with flat tappet cam break in. The reduced zinc seems to have caused a much higher number of breakin failures than in the past. The advice to break in on just the outer springs has been in the Comp and other manufacturers instructions for many years. Most seem to follow it, some dont, and there seems to be success both ways.

I just did a start up on a rebuild with the same flat tappet cam that came out of the motor and same lifters, used Comp Break in Additive, and it seems fine.

It would not hurt to follow the advise.

The other common thing seems to be a rush to Shell Rotella T diesel oil since it supposedly has zinc still in it.
 

Blown331LX

Member
Apr 5, 2005
227
0
16
Chapel Hill, NC
Apr 16, 2009
#14
  • Apr 16, 2009
  • #14
68converted said:
LOL... funny how these threads come back up. I have a full roller block out of a 91 Cobra. The info on their site said that we should pull it apart and check for wear, whether it is a roller or flat tappet. I ran this info by a few shop owners last year, and they laughed their heads off. I think it's a CYA kind of thing>
Click to expand...

Well Im sure youve had your engine apart enough to realize they must be reffering to a flat tappet only or a roller motor where the lifters car rotate, The lifters in a 5.0 Mustang engine cannot because of the lifter hold down hold them in place. I agree thats prolly a CYA disclaimer from the company. If you have a roller motor and the lifters arent shot then slide in whatever cam you want, they will not know any diference. one of the many beautys of a 5,0 HO engine.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Apr 16, 2009
#15
  • Apr 16, 2009
  • #15
rd said:
The other common thing seems to be a rush to Shell Rotella T diesel oil since it supposedly has zinc still in it.
Click to expand...

Not anymore. Valvoline does in their racing oil. There are additives out there that have it. Prob not something on the shelf at Pep Boys though.
ZDDPlus™ - ZDDP Additive for Classic Cars - Agricultural Equipment & More
Another good read.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
798
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
B
For Sale 1986 Capstang (Part Capri & part Mustang) $12,000 Galena, Ohio
  • BubbaG
  • Aug 7, 2022
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Aug 7, 2022
General karthief
U
1966 289 build
  • Uglstang
  • Nov 25, 2021
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 3, 2022
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?