• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Comparison picture of a DOHC 4.6 and a 302

  • Thread starter Thread starter 85_SS_302_Coupe
  • Start date Start date Feb 4, 2008

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 4, 2008
#1
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #1
I saw this on the Merkur forum (yeah, there's guys who've put both into Merkurs ) and thought i'd share it. It's a pretty amazing size difference.

View attachment 332133
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Feb 4, 2008
#2
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #2
Yep, it is a big difference The weight is very close. I almost want to say the DOHC is lighter than the Iron 302.

I may be getting that confused with the SOHC.

OHC engines tend to be wider.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 4, 2008
#3
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #3
Yeah i knew they were big block size but like they say a pic is worth 1000 words right? I've never worked on the mod motors so to me the side by side really sums it up since i'm familiar with the size of a 302.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Feb 4, 2008
#4
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #4
Working on them is more time consuming. I changed a pair of 302 motor mounts in my backyard on my back, hand tools, floor jack, in the 90* heat in under an hour. I spent 4 hours changing my driver side motor mount on my 96 Cobra motor with L/T's, on a hoist, with air tools in 70* heat. If the car had stock manifolds...that would have helped out tremendously.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 4, 2008
#5
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #5
SVT32VDOHC said:
Working on them is more time consuming. I changed a pair of 302 motor mounts in my backyard on my back, hand tools, floor jack, in the 90* heat in under an hour. I spent 4 hours changing my driver side motor mount on my 96 Cobra motor with L/T's, on a hoist, with air tools in 70* heat. If the car had stock manifolds...that would have helped out tremendously.
Click to expand...


Yeah one of my dream cars would be a turbo DOHC 4.6 in a coupe, but i just don't think the end result would be 'more badass than a 302-enough' to justify the hassle. I like an engine compartment that's clutter free and easy to work on and that's not to be used in the same sentence as "DOHC" or "mod motor".
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Feb 4, 2008
#6
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #6
The blocks are way stronger and with that comes the size. The camshafts (2 on each) are on top of the cylinder heads. Not in the block like the pushrod.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Feb 4, 2008
#7
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #7
Give me the one on the left please!
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Feb 4, 2008
#8
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #8
only 4.6 id ever want is a 03/04 cobra motor. or a 05 + there not bad.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Feb 4, 2008
#9
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #9
Mach 1 motor, or a built all motor 4.6 would be badass...
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Feb 4, 2008
#10
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #10
25thmustang said:
Mach 1 motor, or a built all motor 4.6 would be badass...
Click to expand...

true
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Feb 4, 2008
#11
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #11
That pic is like David and Goliath.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 4, 2008
#12
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #12
I've got a buddy who has a '96 Cobra that he's built up the DOHC to run mid 10s on all motor. He's an aluminum welder and made his own intake and all kinds of crazy stuff. It's nasty to say the least. Over the summer he couldn't resist and put a bigass turbo on it and now it's deep in the 9s. Those motors sure don't act their size with those deep breathing heads.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Feb 5, 2008
#13
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #13
they love boost!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Here's a comparison of an Edelbrock Performer RPM Air Gap and a Blueprint intake of the same style...
  • qikgts
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 4, 2024
Blackhawkxx
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
580
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
213
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
429
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?