• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Engine Compression Query

  • Thread starter Thread starter joetrainer31
  • Start date Start date May 6, 2013

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
May 6, 2013
#1
  • May 6, 2013
  • #1
Hello Stangnet,

I'm looking for some input from you brainiac types concerning a compression question.

Since I am the new 2nd owner of a 95 GT I decided to run a few tests on it including a compression test. The car only has 64k on the odometer, but it is 18 years old. Here are the particulars:

1. Engine cold test.
2. Could only get line finger tight on the cylinders.
3. Cranked the engine over the same amount of times for each cylinder.
4. All spark plugs were removed prior to test.
5. TB wide open via gas pedal.
6. Y303 heads, or at least GT40 heads.
7. No additional oil was put into cylinders.
8. All plugs had a little bit of oil them, but were all white on the electrodes. (Maybe wrong heat range?)

The results:

C1 120
C2. 115
C3. 115
C4. 115
C5. 115
C6. 116
C7. 115
C8. 115

What say you all? Considering the test conditions do I have cause for concern or am I good to go?
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
May 6, 2013
#2
  • May 6, 2013
  • #2
That looks excellent to me. ???
Maybe someone else can divine more from it, but so long as your readings are all close, like that, everything's cool.
If you still have concerns, then a wet test might be in order.
I know a wet test tells you different things than a dry test.
Someone might chime in with why you should or should not do a wet test on top of your dry test.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
May 6, 2013
#3
  • May 6, 2013
  • #3
ratio411 said:
That looks excellent to me. ???
Maybe someone else can divine more from it, but so long as your readings are all close, like that, everything's cool.
If you still have concerns, then a wet test might be in order.
I know a wet test tells you different things than a dry test.
Someone might chime in with why you should or should not do a wet test on top of your dry test.
Click to expand...
Ratio411,

Thank you. I really value any input from you all. I'm planning on replacing the lifters. Would u go ahead and do head gaskets if already down to the lifters considering that they might be 18 years old, or are these numbers good enough?
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
May 6, 2013
#4
  • May 6, 2013
  • #4
When it comes to a well balanced long block, if it ain't broke, don't fix it... that's just my opinion though.
The only times to tend to break that rule is oil pump, if I have the pan off for some reason, timing set if I happen to have the timing cover off, or the stock valve springs/seals if I get a chance. Beyond those parts though, I like to keep it simple if everything is working well.

Give it time... it will give you reason to fix something soon enough!
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
May 6, 2013
#5
  • May 6, 2013
  • #5
I realize now why you might do a wet test....
It will tell you if you are having oil control issues in cylinder #1.
That little spike over the others is within tolerance, but what if it is wet from a problem?
Then it might actually be very low compared to the others when they are wet.
I'd do a wet test just to feel warm and fuzzy.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
May 6, 2013
#6
  • May 6, 2013
  • #6
ratio411 said:
When it comes to a well balanced long block, if it ain't broke, don't fix it... that's just my opinion though.
The only times to tend to break that rule is oil pump, if I have the pan off for some reason, timing set if I happen to have the timing cover off, or the stock valve springs/seals if I get a chance. Beyond those parts though, I like to keep it simple if everything is working well.

Give it time... it will give you reason to fix something soon enough!
Click to expand...
That's helpful. Anyone else want to chime in?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
May 7, 2013
#7
  • May 7, 2013
  • #7
The compression is excellent. Leave it alone. With compression like that, the rings are fine, so the oil is not coming up that way. It might be the valve stem seals, but not likely. More than likely the PCV valve is old, and sucking in a little too much oil. change the breather element, and the PCV valve, and see if that fixes the oil problem. That will run you about $6.

Kurt
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
May 8, 2013
#8
  • May 8, 2013
  • #8
revhead347 said:
The compression is excellent. Leave it alone. With compression like that, the rings are fine, so the oil is not coming up that way. It might be the valve stem seals, but not likely. More than likely the PCV valve is old, and sucking in a little too much oil. change the breather element, and the PCV valve, and see if that fixes the oil problem. That will run you about $6.

Kurt
Click to expand...

Thank you, Kurt.

The pcv & element are new. I just pulled the upper off today & the gasket literally fell apart. There was also a vacuume leak from a brittle line under the upper. I'm pulling the lower tomorrow along with the valve covers to fix what seems to be a lifter tick.

Your info on the compression was most helpful, thank you.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
May 8, 2013
#9
  • May 8, 2013
  • #9
Sounds like you are going through things logically. Stick with it.

Kurt
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
May 8, 2013
#10
  • May 8, 2013
  • #10
revhead347 said:
Sounds like you are going through things logically. Stick with it.

Kurt
Click to expand...
Thank you for the encouragement, Kurt.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
May 8, 2013
#11
  • May 8, 2013
  • #11
lifter bath.
dirty boy intake had a gasket that was so brittle it fell apart. The lower intake bolts were little more than hand tight. Its a wonder the car even ran!
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
May 9, 2013
#12
  • May 9, 2013
  • #12
clean lower intake. heads read for light sanding/vacuum, then an ascetone wipe down. how are these for factory rocket arms. These come standard with the SVO GT40 dealer option.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
May 21, 2013
#13
  • May 21, 2013
  • #13
Those roller rockers came on Cobra engines, from Detroit, not the dealer.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
May 21, 2013
#14
  • May 21, 2013
  • #14
ratio411 said:
Those roller rockers came on Cobra engines, from Detroit, not the dealer.
Click to expand...
Hi ratio,

Yes, those came on cobras of the same year from Detroit. They also came on GTs as a dealer SVO GT40 upgrade package along with several other componants for an additional $3k. As soon as my parts all arrive I'll be finishing up the job. I'll have before/after pics and plenty of step by step pics. I hope that they will be helpful to others who may want to do a lifter replace & restoration as they dig into the engine as I am. Thank you for your input once again.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
May 22, 2013
#15
  • May 22, 2013
  • #15
I hope you got more than a Cobra engine for $3K.

Kurt
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
May 22, 2013
#16
  • May 22, 2013
  • #16
revhead347 said:
I hope you got more than a Cobra engine for $3K.

Kurt
Click to expand...
Hi Kurt,

The package consisted of an SVO intake manifold, revised strut tower brace, GT40 Heads, 1.7 RRs, Motorsport shorty headers, Aluminum underdrive pullies, and a rear end ratio of 355s or 373s. Mine has the 373s. I'm pretty sure that the idea back in that day was to offer a performance upgrade option (under warranty) that would allow the Mustang to compete with the Z28 & Firebird of that time period.

I am the 2nd owner of the car so I did not need to absorb the initial cost. The previous owner was also kind enough to install a cat-back upgrade, subframe connectors, and a K-member x-brace. For me, those modifications are enough. I'm just replacing noisey lifters and anything else that looks suspect on the way in/out (e.g., MSD cap, rotor, wires, coil, and various other parts).
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
May 23, 2013
#17
  • May 23, 2013
  • #17
That's a Cobra engine and strut tower brace. It's a lot of money for just a few things, but that's what dealer upgrades cost I guess.

Kurt
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
May 23, 2013
#18
  • May 23, 2013
  • #18
revhead347 said:
That's a Cobra engine and strut tower brace. It's a lot of money for just a few things, but that's what dealer upgrades cost I guess.

Kurt
Click to expand...
I guess so. I assume that they would have charged that amount because the customer would have those upgrades while still being under warranty. Also, they were 50 state legal (a big deal here in CA).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
'04 3.8L V6 mineral deposits and oil on #3 cylinder. Does it need a rebuild or something simpler?
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 18, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
186
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Mar 18, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
D
Engine Questions on compression test results
  • dqureshi06
  • Jan 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
381
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 7, 2025
Noobz347
D
Roller rockers with no compression
  • DPORTER0729
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
876
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2025
mobilly
M
L
Engine Need help diagnosing 2 dead cylinders
  • lvgnmz
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
410
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2025
Mustang5L5
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?