• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Cost effective 5.0/Fox builds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90mustangGT
  • Start date Start date Oct 11, 2006

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Oct 11, 2006
#1
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #1
Seeing the debate/hijacking of a tread about the price of building a fast car, I thought maby it's a good topic. So, what what is a cost effective buildup and what kind of money does it take to build a 12 second car, a 11 second, and down the clock? Or should I say 300rwhp, 400rwhp.....

I know I for one have tried one route and didn't get that good of results. Some mods I did cost hundreds of dallars and maby netted only a few horses, and now looking into it, I think there are much better ways. $$:HP
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 11, 2006
#2
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #2
cant beat a good shot of N02 for the price
 

poneypower89

Now everyone in the world will know I wanna bang t
Dec 6, 2004
0
3
28
Indianapolis, Indiana
Oct 11, 2006
#3
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #3
stykthyn said:
cant beat a good shot of N02 for the price
Click to expand...

Initial cost is ok...

Re-occuring costs can be a pain.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 11, 2006
#4
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #4
poneypower89 said:
Initial cost is ok...

Re-occuring costs can be a pain.
Click to expand...
true
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Oct 11, 2006
#5
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #5
12s can be done for $1000-2000 I would say, 11s at least $4000-5000, 10s, $8000-10,000+

These are extremely rough guesses and not just hacking together junk, but knowing where to find deals. The faster you want to go, the more nickel and dime stuff there is that will drive the cost up.

Also depends on the route you take, and if you do your own work.
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Oct 11, 2006
#6
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #6
speed cost money. money in the car= fast car..
sp it depends on how fast you want to go
 

Woodrow

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
183
0
0
Atlanta/Auburn
Oct 11, 2006
#7
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #7
How To Build a 289-302 One Horsepower Per Cubic Inch for $1,500

By: Alex Denysenko (MoneyMaker) Compiled by Don McDonald

If there is enough interest I can do a small block 289-302 one horsepower per cubic inch build up on this thread. I can put together a proven piece for $1500 or less so that any member can build their own. You must of course be able to do your own assembly and R&R labor. It ain't that hard gang.

After researching several machine shops in my area I will assume that these prices can be duplicated or bettered by most of the USA membership. This build up is based on a garden-variety 65-78 289 or 302 Windsor good condition donor engine core.

You will need to completely disassemble the engine.
1) Degrease and cam bearing bare block with cam bearings $95
2) Bore .060 and finish hone $160
3) Micro polish crank shaft $30
4) Check connecting rods and fit piston pins $40
5) Valve job $130 6) Mill heads .030 $60
6) Machine heads for screw in studs $80
Total spent at machine shop $595

Parts:
1) I opted for a PAW type of inexpensive rebuilder quality engine kit consisting of rings, bearings, oil pump, timing chain and gears, and a gasket set. These generally contain decent quality brands such as Michigan, Muskegeon, Detroit Gasket, Melling, etc. I priced mine through my normal wholesale supplier at $155. You may pay a bit more. 2) A set of Badger .060 11 to 1 pop up cast pistons from us at $150 3) Comp 270S cam, solid lifters, and valve springs $250 4) Steel shim head gaskets $40 5) Edelbrock Air gap or similar intake $220 6) A set of screw in rocker arm studs $20 7) A set of Headman 4 tube headers $90 Total of $925 in parts. Grand total of $1520 spent to get 300 horsepower at the flywheel. If you already have headers you are money ahead. The same with an intake. 351W heads would be a bonus and add about 20 to 25 HP stock. You will need a GOOD 600-750 max CFM carb. A 4100 series 1.12 Autolite is nice or a 700 CFM DP Holley is better. Anything in between is OK also except a Jimmy Carter POS carburetor. If that's all ya got then so be it! Whatever electronic ignition you have (like a FoMoCo Duraspark) is fine. This engine will make 300 HP@6000 RPM at the flywheel on a dyno guaranteed if assembled correctly. Does it sound familiar? Well it should, as it is basically a higher compression 289 HIPO. Add a bigger carb, tube headers, an efficient intake, more compression, more cam and you have got 25 to 30 more HP than the 271 easy. The best part is that it will last and take lots of abuse. These babies are very forgiving if the time is taken to assemble them right. Enjoy! Alex Answers Questions: Alex, .060 over ??? Is it worth taking a chance on the thin walls?? I have a few .030 over blocks that I was gonna use as core trade-ins on one that is bored .030....Is it safe to bore again? You can go .030 if you like. The .060 over bore being too thin is an old wives tale. We go .070 over on 289/302 blocks all of the time on our race motors. The pistons have valve reliefs. There is no economical similar piston for a 351 unfortunately. You will need a steady diet of 93 octane with careful timing adjustments. The 270S cam will allow the high compression. Loosing 2 full points will cost you 25 horsepower. Here in CA, we get stuck 91 octane, Which change would you make? Less timing? Or less compression? I always adjust the timing on street cars by the trial and test method. Keep advancing it until it pings then begin to retard it until it stops. It should still handle 32-34 degrees total on 91 octane. Are the steel shim head gaskets NECESSARY to handle the higher compression? Or, are they thinner to CAUSE higher compression? The SS gaskets are not mandatory. They are worth another 1/2 point in compression. They hold up very well and are cost effective. I don't like Fel-Pro head gaskets on SBF's and the Victors are $65 a piece. Any Chilton’s Mustang manual or Chilton’s motor manual is good. Better yet would be one of the Jim Osborn shop manuals available from M&M. Tom Monroe book is good also. Steve L. I always thought the Tom Monroe book, "How to Rebuild your small block Ford" was one of the best engine assembly books ever written. Alex, how do you fit in the variable of combustion chamber size? i.e., 289, 302, 302-4v heads, and 351 heads all have different combustion chamber volumes that will affect the compression. What heads (and/or combustion chamber volume) are those 11 to 1 Badger pistons designed to be used for? I assume the formula posted above is based on 11:1 compression for the HP, which is why I ask. I don't actually. The 48 cc heads with SS gaskets will garner closer to 12 to 1 and the 53's will be closer to 11 to 1 and the later model ones will be around 10 to 1. Remember that we are cutting the heads also. Smaller chamber heads will get closer to 320 HP. Regardless, the motors will make AT LEAST 300 HP. The 282 cam is a bit TOO radical for a daily driver as far as I'm concerned. Roller rockers are nice, but they just didn't fit into my budget. The sky is the limit as far as options are concerned. This is a tried and true combo with GUARANTEED results. NO BRAG, JUST FACT!

On top of that add a 100 shot plate kit for $500, plus some c112 or c116. 350ish rwhp for 2k....
Or you could build a cheep 393, using 351w rods 302 pistons and 3.85 stroker crank but the c/r would be to high for pump on the street.

Btw this thread is kind of ambiguous
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Oct 11, 2006
#8
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #8
Once you get the power level you want, then you are going to have to start upgrading other areas. Chassis Stiffening, Tranny, Rear End, Upper & Lower Control Arms, and so on.
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
Oct 11, 2006
#9
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #9
Shakerhood said:
Once you get the power level you want, then you are going to have to start upgrading other areas. Chassis Stiffening, Tranny, Rear End, Upper & Lower Control Arms, and so on.
Click to expand...

exactly, its not all about how much power your making, yeah it might make a few glory runs, but the ENTIRE car has to be built, especially when you start breaking into the 11s
 

Roland69

Sergeant Tangnet
Sep 17, 2005
2,867
2
58
Port Elgin, Ontario
Oct 11, 2006
#10
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #10
doing the labour your self helps alot
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Oct 11, 2006
#11
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #11
I agree, 11s are hard to do. Even with the right suspension and best parts, you still have to then dial it and and drive it there... A fast car didnt get there with a check book and a wrench, it takes some kind of talent and time!
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Oct 11, 2006
#12
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #12
25thmustang said:
I agree, 11s are hard to do. Even with the right suspension and best parts, you still have to then dial it and and drive it there... A fast car didnt get there with a check book and a wrench, it takes some kind of talent and time!
Click to expand...

The guys with no brains, just a checkbook, and maby a wrench (but only a few light wrenches) is where Roll Racing comes from.


Two things that is cost effective but often overlooked. One is decent tires, and the other is weight.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Oct 12, 2006
#13
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #13
Yep weight reduction is free!
 

dragnazz5.0

My "0" key d0esn't w0rk, s0 I have t0 use the zer0
Nov 19, 2005
815
5
18
mooresville, nc
Oct 12, 2006
#14
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #14
its not a mustang but my bosses car runs 8.40's in the 1/4 and hes got maybe $20k in the entire car.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Nicholase "lights out" build-
  • nicholase
  • Aug 10, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 26 27 28
Replies
548
Views
37K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Friday at 1:52 PM
nicholase
Betty white budget build
  • Stevenmverrill
  • Jun 16, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 15, 2023
2Blue2
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
786
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
9
1995 Mustang GT Crank no Start
  • 95gtV
  • Sep 1, 2023
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 4, 2023
SRago
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?