• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Crazy gains from aftercar exhaust

  • Thread starter Thread starter jas142
  • Start date Start date Dec 22, 2003
J

jas142

Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,358
0
0
Dec 22, 2003
#1
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #1
Anyone else find it odd that in the latest edition of 5.0 Mustang and Super Fords, they did a dyno test of different boltons, and the aftercat exhaust netted like 10 horsepower, and the Xpipe only got 5? Why is this the case? I've always heard it being the other way around
 

mrvax

Stay thirsty my friends
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,225
3
79
SN Moderator: Orlando, Fl.
Dec 22, 2003
#2
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #2
Lot of variables in dyno runs. The X will always give better gains than a cat-back.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Dec 22, 2003
#3
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #3
I felt an increase from my x pipe, felt nothing from the catback. I did the catback first though.
 
J

jas142

Founding Member
Feb 11, 2002
1,358
0
0
Dec 22, 2003
#4
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #4
Good enough for me, X it is
 

rx7speed

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
314
0
0
wankel wonderland
Dec 23, 2003
#5
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #5
you seem to only look at peak numbers
try this

look at the torque numbers
not just peak
but gains through the rpm range instead
more area under the curve is what is important
now how much of a peak gain you get
 

NFCStang

New Member
Oct 3, 2003
127
0
0
Taking a leak in an SRT-4 gas tank
Dec 23, 2003
#6
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #6
rx7speed said:
you seem to only look at peak numbers
try this

look at the torque numbers
not just peak
but gains through the rpm range instead
more area under the curve is what is important
now how much of a peak gain you get
Click to expand...


Righto...I would rather lose 2 hp at the peak and gain 4 across most of the powerband with TQ as well
 
S

sl03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 29, 2003
182
1
18
Dec 23, 2003
#7
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #7
In that article the O/R X pipe only gained 3hp and lost a ton of low end tourqe.
 

Bone Racing

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
1,075
0
0
Long Island, NY
Dec 23, 2003
#8
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #8
mrvax said:
Lot of variables in dyno runs. The X will always give better gains than a cat-back.
Click to expand...

yup
 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
Dec 23, 2003
#9
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #9
Had they put on the X first it might have been reverse as far as the results.
 

neoclasiccl

Founding Member
Jun 1, 2002
3,043
0
57
Help I can't see !!!!!!
Dec 23, 2003
#10
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #10
I noticed a nice gain on my old 2002 GT with a magnaflow xpipe and magnapack cat back but I have to say with the Cobra the power was much more noticable.
 

rx7speed

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
314
0
0
wankel wonderland
Dec 24, 2003
#11
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #11
sl03gt said:
In that article the O/R X pipe only gained 3hp and lost a ton of low end tourqe.
Click to expand...
I'm confused
you said 5 now 3 hp


but no usually a x-pipe vs true duals the x has quite a bit more through the range
even vs a h pipe
though in the very very low end the h pipe might make a little more but OVERALL the x-pipe wins from what I usually see
 

Rustang Cobra

Founding Member
Apr 17, 2002
490
0
0
Lexington, MA
Dec 24, 2003
#12
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #12
check out the dyno graph in my signature, thas before adding an x pipe vs after adding an x pipe

gains all across the board with a gain of 12rwhp and 10rwtq peak

i felt nothing from the catback

stock realistic numbers for a cobra are 260rwhp/260rwhp

i put down 260rwhp/264rwtq peak with my catback and cold air
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Dec 24, 2003
#13
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #13
rx7speed said:
I'm confused
you said 5 now 3 hp
Click to expand...

2 different people. 1 said 5 hp, the other said 3 hp.
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Dec 24, 2003
#14
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #14
What kind of X was it? That could be it too...
 

rx7speed

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
314
0
0
wankel wonderland
Dec 24, 2003
#15
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #15
JonJon said:
2 different people. 1 said 5 hp, the other said 3 hp.
Click to expand...
*insert smack me in the head smiley here*

ok so I'm stupid

and whats with the bag on the dudes head?
 

Ruffrider

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2001
1,018
0
0
Citrus Springs, FL
Dec 25, 2003
#16
  • Dec 25, 2003
  • #16
My X-pipe made my car feel like a gain over the entire rpm range from the sotp... probably just my mind telling me "wow, your car is loud so it's so much faster" lol.
My cat-back did nothing but make my car sound insane.
 
F

Frank 03GT

New Member
Aug 9, 2003
35
0
0
Dec 25, 2003
#17
  • Dec 25, 2003
  • #17
My Dr. Gas X made a nice difference. I used to get beat consistently by my friend's camaro (89 IROC with a 400 CI small block, mild cam, Ford 9", etc.) by about 1-2 car lengths... he'd get me on the launch and then neither of us would pull. Now I pull him pretty hard through 2nd, 3rd and 4th.... even with a royally screwed launch, I can reel him in now.
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Dec 26, 2003
#18
  • Dec 26, 2003
  • #18
Ruffrider said:
My X-pipe made my car feel like a gain over the entire rpm range from the sotp... probably just my mind telling me "wow, your car is loud so it's so much faster" lol.
My cat-back did nothing but make my car sound insane.
Click to expand...


SOTP difference is really hard to feel on these newer cars....pretty much because the computers adjust and adapt so slowly that the gains are so incremental, you dont really get that SOTP difference right off like on an OBD1 car
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Throwing codes 94, 33, 34, 44, and sporadic engine shutoff.
  • Ryu
  • Oct 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
999
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2024
89ripper
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Engine New to Mustangs, guidance needed on fault codes 47 & 45
  • sUdz6.0pwrstk
  • Sep 30, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 23, 2021
General karthief
Foxtoberfest 2022
  • FastDriver
  • Sep 6, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2022
Ford Moore
F
Exhaust Headers - Myths and Secrets...
  • geoklass
  • Jun 20, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2021
WhiteCobra95
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?