• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Decent Digital Camera Around 250? Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gunmetal5.0
  • Start date Start date May 12, 2007

gunmetal5.0

New Member
May 10, 2006
144
0
0
Chico, CA
May 12, 2007
#1
  • May 12, 2007
  • #1
Can I get a decent digital camera that can maybe do video and has the screen on the back for like 250ish? Anyone with experience in this would be great, thanks! :SNSign:
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
May 12, 2007
#2
  • May 12, 2007
  • #2
got all 3 of mine for free!...free sites FTW!
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
May 12, 2007
#3
  • May 12, 2007
  • #3
hell, my 3.1 megapixal Kodak DX3700 has pretty good quality and it's way under $250 nowadays. If I were to buy a new one, I'd definitely go better just because, but this one works great, isn't hard to use and I think you can do video too, but I never do. Mine was around $200 when I got it back in 2002, so they're under $100 now. I got a 128mb SD memory card and it holds a ton of pictures. I took nearly 300 pictures in Chicago a couple years ago.

If I were to get a new one, I would want a screen on the back (probably 2.5")...mine's only about 1.5" and I would want a more compact one since mine is quite large compared to the really small ones of today.

for $250, you could probably surf ebay and get a used digital video recorder that also does still shots...just saying.

Canon digital cameras are popular. Olympus is also a brand that's tossed around as very good. I like my Kodak.
 

rebelleader

New Member
Mar 18, 2003
185
0
0
Homer Glen, Il
May 12, 2007
#4
  • May 12, 2007
  • #4
I have the 10megapixel version of this Camera

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage...CategoryId=pcmcat99000050010&id=1170290185861

Awesome camera for the money.
 

Ozz

I think I have a problem here.
Founding Member
Jul 27, 2001
3,514
66
109
Canton, MI
May 12, 2007
#5
  • May 12, 2007
  • #5
How long of movies? My basic Sony Cybershot is pretty awesome for what it is, a cheap and point/shoot unit, and takes short videos. Can't compare it to DSLR cameras but I've seen some 8MP cameras that didn't produce pictures as good as this. Mine's only a 3.2 but I've used a 6MP Cybershot as well but noticed not much difference on-screen. Large prints would be another story though, I'm sure.

BTW - I think every digital camera ever, except the tiny/keychain-sized ones, have the LCD screen
 

gunmetal5.0

New Member
May 10, 2006
144
0
0
Chico, CA
May 12, 2007
#6
  • May 12, 2007
  • #6
Okay thanks for all the advice and hints thus far fellas. Yeah actually I guess I want something that does Video foremost and can take still shots. Basically i'd like to make a mount and be able to do driving videos in my cars. Still doable for 250? Canon sounds like a good brand so far.
 
C

caseywan

Member
Apr 7, 2006
157
0
17
Chicago, IL
May 12, 2007
#7
  • May 12, 2007
  • #7
I just bought a Canon Digital Elph, Powershot SD630, and it is by far THEE best digital camera I have ever had, and you can get them for under $250!!

I have had several digital cameras and know quite a bit about them. I've had a few of each: Kodak (mostly crap cameras), Sony (crappy battery life), and Nikon (ok, mostly "grandpa" cameras), but this Canon SD630 is just flat out awesome! It has a rechargeable lithium ion battery that lasts a long, long time and fully charges in about 30 mins, is 6 megapixels (more than enough for any kind of consumer use), it has a huge 3" screen that is just awesome, and it has very good video/sound quality, tons of display options and picture editing options.

I have a 1gb card (about $30) and I can take about 10minutes straight of 640x480 30fps video with sound, that's the same resolution as a TV, which is very high quality for a digital camera that will fit in your shirt pocket. You can also downgrade the quality to 320x240 and 15fps (which is still fairly decent quality) and get like 45 mins of video!

The only thing I don't like about it is that it only has 3x optical zoom, but it does have like 8x digial zoom.

Overall awesome camera for the price, I highly reccommend it.
 
C

caseywan

Member
Apr 7, 2006
157
0
17
Chicago, IL
May 12, 2007
#8
  • May 12, 2007
  • #8
If you look at the previous thread of mine I just started yesterday, I put some video links in there from a ski trip of mine. All of those pictures in that thread and both of those videos were all from my Canon SD630.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=700500

Keep in mind when I uploaded the videos to Google Video, they compress the videos so the quality is not near what it is on my computer in Divx Player, but you can tell from the slow motion shots that it has really good quality frame rate and such.
 

grey5.0beast

Cookies should never be DUNKED!!!
Aug 3, 2004
0
1
0
atl ga
May 13, 2007
#9
  • May 13, 2007
  • #9
I have the Kodak v603 and its awesome. Mob has the v550 an older version and he talked me into kodak. I got it probably 6-7 months ago and its awesome.
 

tjmaxx

Member
Jun 21, 2004
157
3
19
May 13, 2007
#10
  • May 13, 2007
  • #10
I work at Best Buy and I personally like the Canon digital camera's. If you opt for the Canon sd1000, it is a 7.1 megapixel camera with 3x zoom but also has some digital zoom. Thats probably my favorite camera for the price. This is the link to it. The best thing to do with a memory card is to keep your eye out for whats on sale.

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8266164&st=canon+sd1000&type=product&id=1170290185654
 

gunmetal5.0

New Member
May 10, 2006
144
0
0
Chico, CA
May 14, 2007
#11
  • May 14, 2007
  • #11
Wow thanks for the great help guys I was hoping for some specifics, way to come through. I was really starting to lean toward canon also, I think the SD 630 sounds right in my price range and will do what I want it to do! Is it set up like a mini handheld camcorder thing or a reg. digital camera with a screen on the back?
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
May 14, 2007
#12
  • May 14, 2007
  • #12
Got a Kodak CX4300, here. It's a slow, cumbersome, battery-eating turd, but it gets the job done, and the shots it catches ain't too horrible. I can't justify spending the cash on a better one quite yet - too many other needs/wants in line ahead of it. (Such as a better effects pedal, a bass, better editing/recording software, a camcorder that doesn't suck arse ... oh yeah, and paying off my debts. )
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
351w engine swap
  • Killer351w
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
197
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 21, 2026
Killer351w
K
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
574
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
P
Air Fuel ratio bung location.
  • Praetorious
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
851
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2026
Noobz347
B
Advice after break down.
  • bjornsn95
  • Jan 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2025
bjornsn95
B
Sn95 new style hub retaining nuts
  • limp
  • Mar 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
484
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 7, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?