• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Definition of "CFM"

  • Thread starter Thread starter 85_SS_302_Coupe
  • Start date Start date Apr 15, 2005

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 15, 2005
#1
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #1
It dawned on me the other day that i don't know exactly what "cfm" stands for, so now i feel completely noob I've looked around and all i can find is some serious physics type definitions that i barely understand, mainly "contraint force mixing"....is this the right definition or am i going off on another path?
 

squeeeg

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
1,905
0
0
Michigan
Apr 15, 2005
#2
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #2
I think it is cubic feet per minute
 
I

Insane3D

New Member
Jul 21, 2004
310
0
0
Apr 15, 2005
#3
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #3
squeeeg said:
I think it is cubic feet per minute
Click to expand...



That's how I've always known it...
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 15, 2005
#4
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #4
squeeeg said:
I think it is cubic feet per minute
Click to expand...


Yea that's what i had guessed but then i got all this constraint force mixing crap and it totally threw me off. And then i read that cubic feet per minute is an assumption....
 

TheBocSez

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
652
0
0
Converse, TX
Apr 15, 2005
#5
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #5
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Yea that's what i had guessed but then i got all this constraint force mixing crap and it totally threw me off. And then i read that cubic feet per minute is an assumption....
Click to expand...

I think it would be an assumption. Using a carburator as an example, it assumes that a 600cfm carb would draw 600 cubic feet per min of air is left at wide open throttle for 1 minute but there are too many factors that can affect the carb to include air density. Now I may be totally wrong on that statement but if you read it, it sure does sound smart!!
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 15, 2005
#6
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #6
Yeah it's cubic feet per minute which is a standard measurement of airflow that indicates how many cubic feet of air pass by a stationary point in one minute.

According to a definition "1 CFM equals approximately 2 liters per second"...but wouldn't that be 1200 liters of air in a second with a cfm of 600 (carbed example)...seems a bit high to me
 

Car RamRod

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
623
0
0
Queens, NYC
Apr 15, 2005
#7
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #7
Insane3D said:


That's how I've always known it...
Click to expand...

me too
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Apr 15, 2005
#8
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #8
and if talking about fan draw, note that the procedure used in measuring makes a world of difference (a better flowing fan can show poorer relative flow numbers than an inferior fan simply from different testing protocol).
 

Ordie

Member
Nov 23, 2004
0
0
7
Key West, FL
Apr 16, 2005
#9
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #9
5spd GT said:
Yeah it's cubic feet per minute which is a standard measurement of airflow that indicates how many cubic feet of air pass by a stationary point in one minute.

According to a definition "1 CFM equals approximately 2 liters per second"...but wouldn't that be 1200 liters of air in a second with a cfm of 600 (carbed example)...seems a bit high to me
Click to expand...
that would be 1200 liters per minute not second...
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 16, 2005
#10
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #10
Ordie said:
that would be 1200 liters per minute not second...
Click to expand...

If 1cfm equals 2 liters per second...and you put the 600cfm in place of the 1cfm you would multiply the 2 liters by 600 which would be 1200 liters per second...
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Apr 16, 2005
#11
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #11
5spd GT said:
If 1cfm equals 2 liters per second...and you put the 600cfm in place of the 1cfm you would multiply the 2 liters by 600 which would be 1200 liters per second...
Click to expand...

How does 1cfm equal 2 liters per second. Please link me to the source you got that from. That is wayyyy off.
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Apr 16, 2005
#12
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #12
Wow guys, that's some pretty poor dimensional analysis.


1 [ft^3] (cubic foot) = 28.317 [liters]

1 [ft^3/min] (cubic feet per minute) = 28.317 [liters/min] (just divided both sides by the unit 'minutes')

Therefore, 600 [ft^3/min] * 28.317 [liters/ft^3] = 16,990.2 [liters/min]

16,990.2 [liters/min] * 1/60 [min/sec] = 283.17 [liters/sec]

Make sense?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 16, 2005
#13
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #13
mackey said:
How does 1cfm equal 2 liters per second. Please link me to the source you got that from. That is wayyyy off.
Click to expand...

It was off some link when I did a quick search for the definition...later on down it talked about air conditioning units though...so that could be the "difference"...

illwood - Nice copy and paste
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Apr 16, 2005
#14
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #14
5spd GT said:
illwood - Nice copy and paste
Click to expand...

Copy and paste?

I have the piece of paper that I used right here to figure it out from the conversion of 1 inch = 2.54 centimeters and 1000 cubic centimeters = 1 liter.

Sheesh, give me some credit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
853
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
543
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
J
Car Diagnosis
  • j.2016
  • Aug 31, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
3
Views
324
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 31, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?