• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Did I gain any RWHP?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BuffaloZone
  • Start date Start date Jun 29, 2004
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Next
First Prev 8 of 10 Next Last

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#141
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #141
StngStr said:
Bummer.
Click to expand...




StngStr said:
Ok, I agree that changing rotors can change the amount of RWHP, you are right.
Click to expand...

 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#142
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #142
StngStr said:
Thanks for letting me know that I lied when I claimed that a loss of rwhp wasn't really a loss of rwhp. Awesome! Thanks again!
Click to expand...


"there....i fixed it for you."

 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#143
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #143
StngStr said:
ok..Ok, I agree that changing rotors can change the amount of RWHP, you are right.
Click to expand...


 

ProCharger GT

Member
Jun 3, 2004
153
0
16
Cleveland
Jul 1, 2004
#144
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #144
"Did I gain any RWHP?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Removed my Cobra Nose and reinstalled my "Original" GT Nose. Am I the only one that actually prefers the retro look of the original grille? Plus being smaller, I hope to have less "drag" (to help offset the giant wing). The main reason for removal was actually because I didn't like the curled-up Cobra lip...and some turd-smear did a super suck surface prep job on the bumper cover before painting it - looked perfect for a few months, but now tiny bubbles are popping up all along the bottom."

That is the first post of the thread. your initial question has nothing to do about brakes. I gave you quite a lengthly explanation of body kits and such, but your ignorance must have read right over it to type in another post that makes no sense. You asked if changing the bumper gave you horsepower, everyone says NO. The answer, no matter how many posts/smiley faces you decide to add, is still NO. HP is different than downforce that air applies on a car. I didnt realise this was so incredibly hard to understand. if you want free posts do it in a non tech forum. believe it or not, some people actually come here for information.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 1, 2004
#145
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #145
Thank you ProchargedGT!!!
 
S

StangMan90

New Member
Jan 6, 2003
7
0
0
Florida
Jul 1, 2004
#146
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #146
View attachment 524377
 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#147
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #147
ProCharger GT said:
"Did I gain any RWHP?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Removed my Cobra Nose and reinstalled my "Original" GT Nose. Am I the only one that actually prefers the retro look of the original grille? Plus being smaller, I hope to have less "drag" (to help offset the giant wing). The main reason for removal was actually because I didn't like the curled-up Cobra lip...and some turd-smear did a super suck surface prep job on the bumper cover before painting it - looked perfect for a few months, but now tiny bubbles are popping up all along the bottom."

That is the first post of the thread. your initial question has nothing to do about brakes. I gave you quite a lengthly explanation of body kits and such, but your ignorance must have read right over it to type in another post that makes no sense. You asked if changing the bumper gave you horsepower, everyone says NO. The answer, no matter how many posts/smiley faces you decide to add, is still NO. HP is different than downforce that air applies on a car. I didnt realise this was so incredibly hard to understand. if you want free posts do it in a non tech forum. believe it or not, some people actually come here for information.
Click to expand...


Yes, it's a "subject line", but if someone actually took the time to read the *text* they'd figure out real fast that I wasn't actually concerned with HP...at all. That's why HP wasn't mentioned even ONCE during the entire original body of text:

"Am I the only one that actually prefers the retro look of the original grille?"
"Plus being smaller, I hope to have less 'drag' (to help offset the giant wing)."
"The main reason for removal was actually because I didn't like the curled-up Cobra lip..."


Yeah. See. That's what I thought.
 
N

njfiya

New Member
Feb 24, 2004
19
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#148
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #148
There is no hope here. BuffaloZone is the same guy that USED to have "TYPE R WING" in his sig instead of Cobra R Wing. He was after someone pointed it out and in the end said "I'll call it what I want". Now it seems to read Cobra R wing. Looks like he realized what a dingus he was being then, maybe he will after this is all said and done but it won't happen in the thread.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Jul 1, 2004
#149
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #149
this thread is so f%^king stupid.

 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#150
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #150
njfiya said:
There is no hope here. BuffaloZone is the same guy that USED to have "TYPE R WING" in his sig instead of Cobra R Wing. He was after someone pointed it out and in the end said "I'll call it what I want". Now it seems to read Cobra R wing. Looks like he realized what a dingus he was being then, maybe he will after this is all said and done but it won't happen in the thread.
Click to expand...


You're crying about "TYPE R WING" at a forum that probably thinks bumber=bummer, bumber=bumper, braiks=brakes, breaks=brakes, losing rwhp doesn't mean a loss of rwhp...and probably countless 1,000's of other nice little ignorant "slips" every day?

 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#151
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #151
StangMan90 said:
View attachment 524375
Click to expand...


"She's hot!"
 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#152
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #152
hognutz said:
this thread is so f%^king stupid.

Click to expand...


So you won't reply on this thread again?
 
I

inferno9898

Member
May 17, 2003
249
1
18
Jul 1, 2004
#153
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #153
 

Attachments

  • clown.webp
    17.1 KB · Views: 278

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Jul 1, 2004
#154
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #154
BuffaloZone said:
So you won't reply on this thread again?
Click to expand...


one more. I will give you a little insight. when everone else things you are wrong and you are the only one hanging on the "I am smarter than everbody" bs defending your pointless position. You are proably wrong or someone would have agree'd with you by now.

I mean **** I must have gained some rwhp when I got out my car this morning by your logic.
 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#155
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #155
hognutz said:
one more.
Click to expand...

I doubt it.


hognutz said:
I will give you a little insight.
Click to expand...

When you can't even spell "thinks"?


hognutz said:
when everone else things
Click to expand...

"things"?


hognutz said:
you are wrong
Click to expand...

Originally Posted by StngStr:
"Ok, I agree that changing rotors can change the amount of RWHP, you are right."


hognutz said:
and you are the only one hanging on the "I am smarter than everbody"
Click to expand...

Liar. I never made that claim.



hognutz said:
You are proably
Click to expand...





hognutz said:
wrong or someone would have agree'd with you by now.
Click to expand...

Originally Posted by StngStr:
"Ok, I agree that changing rotors can change the amount of RWHP, you are right."


 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#156
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #156
StngStr said:
This guy just doesn't seem to get it
Click to expand...


That's why --you-- said:

"They WILL use up more of that rear wheel horsepower to turn, but they won't change the amount of rear wheel horsepower"

They suck up HP, but it won't "change" the HP numbers? That's like saying a product WILL really increase your fuel economy, but it sure won't change the amount of miles you can drive on a tank of fuel.




inferno9898 said:
Click to expand...
 
I

inferno9898

Member
May 17, 2003
249
1
18
Jul 1, 2004
#157
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #157
dude....you asked if your bumper increased your RWHP. you suck at life, get over it
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 1, 2004
#158
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #158
I say BAN HIM!!!
 
F

fordrngr

New Member
Apr 29, 2004
25
0
1
Middletown, DE
Jul 1, 2004
#159
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #159
BuffaloZone said:
You're saying that "faster" isn't "quicker"? That's like saying "slow" sure isn't "sluggish"...
Click to expand...


No "faster" is not "quicker". Fast is like saying "My car can do 250 MPH. But it takes 30 minutes to get to that speed". Quick is like saying "My car can do 250 MPH and it only takes 8 seconds to get there". In order to be "Quick" you have to be "Fast". You don't have to be "Quick" to be "Fast"
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Jul 1, 2004
#160
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #160
While 99% of this thread has been a bunch of name calling Bull S***, most of the people calling it a stupid question put very little thought into it why it was wrong. In BuffaloZone's defense he simply asked that by decreasing drag, does it affect power. I don't see that as such a stupid question.

If power = (force*distance)/time what part of the equation is effected by drag. If you are standing on the throttle, force remains constant. drag reduces the amount of force required to move the car so with the same amount of force distance is either increased or time is decreased, leaving power output the same, but overall performance would be increased But I doubt there is enough drag reduced by changing the bumper.

So, the answer is still no, but at the very least I think he put a little more thought into his question, than I think most (not all) put into their answers.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Next
First Prev 8 of 10 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
9
  • Locked
Expired 1999 35th Ann. Limited Convertible, Supercharged,air Ride, 19k Miles
  • 99white_vert_limited
  • Jul 28, 2016
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
5
Views
5K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Oct 10, 2016
07SGT1348
0
Recovering Rear 1994 Convertible Mach 460 Speaker Grilles
  • 5.0 Ford Guy
  • Jul 20, 2013
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
9
Views
11K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 25, 2013
5.0 Ford Guy
B
  • Locked
Expired 00/03 Cobra Clone Fully Built Street/track Monster Kenne Bell
  • BOSS GT
  • Aug 20, 2013
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
4
Views
12K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Oct 29, 2013
BOSS GT
B
  • Locked
SOLD 1990 Mustang Gt, Vortech, T56, Forgelines
  • Jdeserio
  • Jun 22, 2013
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
27K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jul 4, 2013
Jaxmustang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?