Ryan02Stang said:I say BAN HIM!!!
jstreet0204 said:While 99% of this thread has been a bunch of name calling Bull S***, most of the people calling it a stupid question put very little thought into it why it was wrong. In BuffaloZone's defense he simply asked that by decreasing drag, does it affect power. I don't see that as such a stupid question.
If power = (force*distance)/time what part of the equation is effected by drag. If you are standing on the throttle, force remains constant. drag reduces the amount of force required to move the car so with the same amount of force distance is either increased or time is decreased, leaving power output the same, but overall performance would be increased But I doubt there is enough drag reduced by changing the bumper.
So, the answer is still no, but at the very least I think he put a little more thought into his question, than I think most (not all) put into their answers.
Then why post with a misleading subject line? What you meant to ask and what you've been trying to spit out for the past 7 pages is irrelevant to your original topic. So tell me, is ignorance bliss?BuffaloZone said:Yes, it's a "subject line", but if someone actually took the time to read the *text* they'd figure out real fast that I wasn't actually concerned with HP...at all. That's why HP wasn't mentioned even ONCE during the entire original body of text:
"Am I the only one that actually prefers the retro look of the original grille?"
"Plus being smaller, I hope to have less 'drag' (to help offset the giant wing)."
"The main reason for removal was actually because I didn't like the curled-up Cobra lip..."
Yeah. See. That's what I thought.
inferno9898 said:dude....you asked if your bumper increased your RWHP. you suck at life, get over it
SonicBlue2v03GT said:Hey...Buffalo jagoff
Dysfunctional <--- Did I spell that good enough
ProCharger GT said:Then why post with a misleading subject line?
What you meant to ask and what you've been trying to spit out for the past 7 pages is irrelevant to your original topic.
fordrngr said:No "faster" is not "quicker".
BuffaloZone said:That's like saying "fast" isn't "quick".
Entry: fast
5. swift: quick: speedy
Ryan02Stang said:I say BAN HIM!!!
NasaGT said:Amen. Lock this thread and fire up the ban-o-matic.
StngStr said:Good morning.
StngStr said:Yes...they will use up more rear wheel horsepower to turn them. So....WON'T change the power at the rear wheels.
StngStr said:BuffaloToe says, "So you know about that place? Go there often?"
20 me
StangLou said:I only read about the first page and a half of this horrid thread, so sorry if this has been brought up or if he got the smarts to clarify what the hell he was talking about.
The vast majority of your argument is based on the fact you know of a dyno that will factor in wind resistance ect... Given this fact, along with the fact that on any given day the same dyno with the same car, in the same conditions can give you results differing in 1-3rwhp... I would say your plan of going to this marvelous dyno to get your gains in rwhp from your bumper swap isThe minimal gains in top end mph you would gain would hardly even warrent a change in the dyno. Granted your amazing dyno could notice a change in wind resistance and give you higher MPH #'s, but not RWHP #'s. You may have ment mph change when making this pos thread, but you stated rwhp change for some odd reason. On top of that you get into a mine is bigger arguement with everyone Ever heard of MustangWorld.com... sign up there!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?