• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

difficulty of cam install on a 4.6 2v?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DerekStangGT
  • Start date Start date Apr 2, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

EddieHaskell

Banned
Jul 18, 2004
73
0
0
North Carolina
Apr 3, 2005
#21
  • Apr 3, 2005
  • #21
TweekedGT said:
$550 will get you 25-30rwhp with the stage 1's. $750 will get you 50rwhp with stage 2's. Guys with VT stage 2's have gotten up to 55rwhp gain on a dyno. I don't think your going to get 50rwhp from a $750 mod for any import .
Click to expand...
55rwhp? Is that with stock heads?
 

97v6Silver

it came to $4.56 and i got $0.44 change from a 5,
Apr 22, 2003
843
0
0
VA Beach
Apr 3, 2005
#22
  • Apr 3, 2005
  • #22
nitrous make more hp then that btw
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
Elwood, IN
Apr 3, 2005
#23
  • Apr 3, 2005
  • #23
Dave00GT said:
Just a thought, but wouldn't the stock head be a restriction to a set of aftermarket cams? I'm thinking about a head/cam package, rather then just cams later on down the road when I get her blown
Click to expand...

Yes and no. VT Stage I or Comp Cams EX262AH are pretty good for the stock heads. I had plans to get my heads ported down the road so I went with Comp Cams XE270AHs. With as few mods as I have, I was pleasantly surprised with the outcome.

I have:

- Comp 270s
- C&L upper plenum
- Accufab 75mm TB
- Mac Headers
- O/R X
- Magnaflow catback w/spintechs
- Steeda pulleys
- Steeda CAI

290rwhp/301rwtq

There is a thread from Modular Depot that I can't access at this time, but it was a near-stock '00 GT. The only mod was a pair of welded in Flowmasters and it got 29rwhp from VT Stage IIs.
 

EddieHaskel

New Member
Apr 3, 2005
1
0
1
North Carolina
Apr 3, 2005
#24
  • Apr 3, 2005
  • #24
I like to rub peanut butter on my thingy.
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Apr 3, 2005
#25
  • Apr 3, 2005
  • #25
EddieHaskel said:
I like to rub peanut butter on my thingy.
Click to expand...
thanks for the bump......perv

EDIT: Nick, did you get a tune w/ your cams?
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Apr 3, 2005
#26
  • Apr 3, 2005
  • #26
you have to get a tune with the cams. think of getting Mike Murrillo here in san antonio to tune your car afterwards. heres his shops website:

http://murillomotorsports.com/

he does GREAT work. Firemanz's Roush is tuned by Mike.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Apr 4, 2005
#27
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #27
DerekStangGT said:
thanks for the bump......perv

EDIT: Nick, did you get a tune w/ your cams?
Click to expand...



i know, but i'll let him answer



as for myself i got a tune, prolly a good thing i did too. when i took it to MPH to get it tuned it was at 18:1 a/f so you don't 'need' it but i sure wouldn't skimp on one
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Apr 4, 2005
#28
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #28
c2see21 said:
i know, but i'll let him answer



as for myself i got a tune, prolly a good thing i did too. when i took it to MPH to get it tuned it was at 18:1 a/f so you don't 'need' it but i sure wouldn't skimp on one
Click to expand...
C2, do you have any dyno info or gains from your setup? what cams did you go with and what were your impressions? thanks
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Apr 4, 2005
#29
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #29
DerekStangGT said:
C2, do you have any dyno info or gains from your setup? what cams did you go with and what were your impressions? thanks
Click to expand...




yup, i made 273rwhp & 297rwtq, 13.5 - 13.0 a/f. was gunna switch a few things around & shoot for 300rwhp with the stage 1 cams, but now i'm getting a novi 2000 within the month. which is part of the reason i went with the stage 1's actually, lol. i didn't want the cams eating up tooooo much boost if i changed my mind.

the car is completely different with the cams, it pulls all the way past redline now a friend got a nice lil vid of me pulling past a ls1 TA in 4th gear this past week, if that tells ya anything
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Apr 4, 2005
#30
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #30
c2see21 said:
yup, i made 273rwhp & 297rwtq, 13.5 - 13.0 a/f. was gunna switch a few things around & shoot for 300rwhp with the stage 1 cams, but now i'm getting a novi 2000 within the month. which is part of the reason i went with the stage 1's actually, lol. i didn't want the cams eating up tooooo much boost if i changed my mind.

the car is completely different with the cams, it pulls all the way past redline now a friend got a nice lil vid of me pulling past a ls1 TA in 4th gear this past week, if that tells ya anything
Click to expand...
thanks for the info! in your opinion, do you think the stage 2s are too much for a N/A DD? im just afraid that after spending so much on cams and springs, i'll be disapointed with the results
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Apr 4, 2005
#31
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #31
DerekStangGT said:
thanks for the info! in your opinion, do you think the stage 2s are too much for a N/A DD? im just afraid that after spending so much on cams and springs, i'll be disapointed with the results
Click to expand...



no i don't think they'd be too much at all. if you are planning on staying n/a & possibly getting some head work done in the future, i'd definately get them. here are a couple clips of my car with the cams. first one is right after the install, the second is right after tim lowered my idle a touch. the car has vt stage 1's, mac lt's, prochamber & weld in flowpaths at the moment for exhaust

start up
adjusted idle
 

mcmmotorsports

Member
Apr 12, 2004
689
0
17
Danbury, CT
Apr 4, 2005
#32
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #32
I think the biggest problem with the AFM Tool and others similar is just what the guys said above, they didn't lock it in place as said in the instructions, that why some have had the chain skip and go out of timing thus giving the tool a bad rep....people not reading instructions.
I am leaning towards Stage I's and the cam tool.
 

Mirrahasmycar

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
210
0
0
CT
Apr 4, 2005
#33
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #33
5.0 mustangs

there was an install guide in one of the issues of 5.0 mustangs and FF last fall on how to do it step by step
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
Elwood, IN
Apr 4, 2005
#34
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #34
I've got a tune with my cams. It would run without a tune, but that was about it. Drivablility was poor and it wanted to die at stop signs. I had the Steeda reflash and that and the cam combo made for a really lean A/F ratio.

With the tune, the car is docile and could easily be used as a daily driver. I would, but I have my Nissan to take the beatings from my co-worker's doors and to get eaten by the salt monster.
 

seany425

New Member
Aug 18, 2004
90
0
0
Apr 4, 2005
#35
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #35
nickthegenius said:
HAR HAR HAR!!! Thats some great intarw3b mis-information, dumb ass

Derek, if you only do cams, you can use one of the cam tools either from your local Ford dealer or the Anderson Ford Motorsports tool. I used the AFM tool for my cam install. Had I only done the cams, it would have taken about 2 hours. The springs are what take a while. If you want to get some good power increases and not have to change the springs, go for a set of VT Engines Stage I cams. Bill Putnam (Mustang92 on this board) got 22rwhp/1rwtq from his VT Stage Is.

If you want to do it the "right way" and pull the front cover, here is a write up from start to finish. This is Bill Putnam's write-up from Modular Depot:

http://www.modulardepot.com/?show=articlesdet&aid=39
Click to expand...


really only 2 hours thats not too bad figure even if it took 4 hours thats not too bad, anyone have a writeup for an install of the stage 1 w/o doing the springs???
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Apr 4, 2005
#36
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #36
seany425 said:
really only 2 hours thats not too bad figure even if it took 4 hours thats not too bad, anyone have a writeup for an install of the stage 1 w/o doing the springs???
Click to expand...




you can still use that guide, just omit the part about the valve springs. that's what i used to do mine
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
427
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
948
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Suspension Setting Front Alignment - Do I care about the rear's thrust angle?
  • dan50
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
354
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Kid wita 5oh
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?