• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Dilemma, wut to do with a tired motor

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrueBlue95GT
  • Start date Start date Nov 17, 2004

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
41
Connecticut
Nov 17, 2004
#1
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #1
My motor is getting tired and I dont know what to do with it. Should I rebuild it and put some TFS heads on it with a Custom cam, or should I save up some money and get a 347 stroker kit with I dunno what type of heads and a custom cam, or should I save up more and get a 351? Keep in mind that down the road, I will be making a custom turbo kit. I want to be at least deep into the 11's, later. Help me decide what to do now.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 17, 2004
#2
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #2
What kind of mileage is on the motor? What makes it "tired"? Using oil excessively?

I'd save the cash for a cast crank, a nice rod, and a nice set of pistons and put them into the overbored stock block. You could have a nice 425 RWHP daily driven car with the properly chosen parts.

Joe
 

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
41
Connecticut
Nov 17, 2004
#3
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #3
I only have 76,000miles on the car, but I wasn't the first owner. Anyway, its got low compression.
 
9

95redSVT

New Member
Dec 20, 2003
35
0
0
Nov 17, 2004
#4
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #4
I bought m cobra and promptly dynoed it at 140 hp to the back wheels. Is she tired? hell yeah. Is she still the last year they put the 5.0 in a mustang, hell yeah. Im rebuilding mine over the winter. If i were you Id keep the motor no matter what so that you still have the stock block/heads that kinda stuff. If you buy a new motor then just store the original and if you keep the car for any long term, slowly rebuild it and sell her in 20 years
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 17, 2004
#5
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #5
TrueBlue95GT said:
I only have 76,000miles on the car, but I wasn't the first owner. Anyway, its got low compression.
Click to expand...
Did you do a compression check? What did it check out at? If it sounds like I'm trying to disprove you or call you wrong, I'm sorry; I don't mean to.

Anyway, it kinda sounds like you are looking for a reason to build a 347?

Joe
 

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
41
Connecticut
Nov 17, 2004
#6
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #6
Well I did do a compression test, but I didnt do it totally right. I did the test, but forgot to keep the throttle butterfly open. So I got basically 130psi in most of the cylinders and got 142psi in one of them and the other I got 65psi. This makes me think I have a burnt exhaust valve and low compression overall. I dont want to replace the cylinder heads thinking its a burnt exhaust valve and find out that my piston rings are shot because this is my daily driver. So I might as well build a setup and drop it in. It's never run up to "par". I ran a 14.8 with the mods I have on now with a 2.2 sixty foot. Enough said.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 17, 2004
#7
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #7
TrueBlue95GT said:
Well I did do a compression test, but I didnt do it totally right. I did the test, but forgot to keep the throttle butterfly open. So I got basically 130psi in most of the cylinders and got 142psi in one of them and the other I got 65psi. This makes me think I have a burnt exhaust valve and low compression overall. I dont want to replace the cylinder heads thinking its a burnt exhaust valve and find out that my piston rings are shot because this is my daily driver. So I might as well build a setup and drop it in. It's never run up to "par". I ran a 14.8 with the mods I have on now with a 2.2 sixty foot. Enough said.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't go by track times in this case. Track times don't necessarily tell you if something is "wrong" with your car.

Those compression test numbers are typical of some old 5.0's with the butterfly OPEN. Well, I shouldn't say typical, but they certainly aren't out of the ordinary. The one cylinder's 65 PSI seems kind of fishy, but I think maybe you didn't test that one the same, causing you to get a "bad" reading?

I honestly don't think anything is wrong. Maybe it just needs a tune-up of some sorts? Have you tried putting it on a dyno and checking the A/F ratios and seeing what kind of power it's spitting out?

Just for your reassurance, I have never seen or heard of a car that blew the rings out of it and didn't have oil consumption problems, and that was still driveable. Again, just because I say that doesn't mean that it does not exist.

Good luck.

Joe
 

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
41
Connecticut
Nov 17, 2004
#8
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #8
i checked the 65psi cylinder three times and got the same result each time which makes me think bad exhaust valve. Could the butterfly not being open lower the compression numbers?
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 18, 2004
#9
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #9
TrueBlue95GT said:
Could the butterfly not being open lower the compression numbers?
Click to expand...
Eh, well, um, see, I, well, I...I don't know.

There are too many other factors playing into that.

What do you mean when you say bad or burnt exhaust valve? You think it's not coming into contact with the seat anymore?

Joe
 

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
41
Connecticut
Nov 18, 2004
#10
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #10
Ya, i heard that an exhaust valve not seating correctly is the most common reason only one cylinder has low compression. it's not likely that the rings went only on that cylinder. And i'm pretty sure my headgaskets are fine because i have no coolant mixed with the oil and no smoke out the tailpipes.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 18, 2004
#11
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #11
TrueBlue95GT said:
Ya, i heard that an exhaust valve not seating correctly is the most common reason only one cylinder has low compression. it's not likely that the rings went only on that cylinder. And i'm pretty sure my headgaskets are fine because i have no coolant mixed with the oil and no smoke out the tailpipes.
Click to expand...
If the exhaust valve isn't seating properly, there must be something on that valve not letting it...

Maybe run some kind of engine cleaner through it? The purpose of that stuff is to clean all the carbon off the pistons. It should clean the valves off too (well, do a half-assed job of it). I'm just throwing ideas around....

The only other way is to lift that head.

Joe
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
42
San Diego
Nov 18, 2004
#12
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #12
I dont think the butter fly being open or not would be a problem, as long as you did all the cylinders the same then that is fine. Why not just take the heads off and see how they look, and then start from there. Most 5.0L last for quite a long time, so unless it was abused before you owned it with no oil changes and high heat and RPMs it should be alright.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Nov 18, 2004
#13
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #13
I would honestly do the following:

With the engine running mist water into the intake tract, this will form steam in the cyclinders and help to clean the carbon. On a mopar since there is no MAF this works well and is easy. jsut keep revving the egnine a bit to make sure it gets sucked in. I usually run about 8 oz through the engine and my missting it with a spray bottle you will not hydrolock the motor.

Then use a scraper of some sort and a scre driver and really celan around the spark plug hole, then remove the spark plug and re-try the compression test. the compression tester not being fully seated or sealed here will give the same results.

Let us know how it goes.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
48
st.louis mo 314
Nov 18, 2004
#14
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #14
TrueBlue95GT said:
Could the butterfly not being open lower the compression numbers?
Click to expand...

Dont you do a comp. check on the comp. stroke? That would mean that the valves are closed anyway (or should be) making it realy pointless to have the t-blade open as the cyl. should be sealed by the valves at that point.

The vavles could be bad, and so could the head gasket as not always does the coolant flow into the oil or vice versa. Also the rings could be bad too.
 

94Blue302GT

Member
Oct 20, 2003
704
3
19
43
Chicago
Nov 18, 2004
#15
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #15
i think you need to just give up mustang racin altogether and gimmie your car... well, at least a drivers side fender.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
262
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
653
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Fox won't crank over and fuel pump won't kick on.
  • djj62478
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
358
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
833
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?