• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Dissapointing Results - Have I Missed Something?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhjo
  • Start date Start date Dec 18, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Jun 5, 2015
#41
  • Jun 5, 2015
  • #41
I just got a call from Dyno-shop. The car has now 285 HP.

After the intitial Dyno-test (cf 1. post), we installed the following:

1. Scott Drake Tri-Y headers
2. Edelbrock Performer Air gap intake
3. Underdrive pulley
4. Went from 500 cfm to 600 cfm carburator
5. Replaced fuel filter

(Please read 1. post in this thread before you reply)
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 5, 2015
#42
  • Jun 5, 2015
  • #42
i am betting that most of the change came from the extra 100cfm carb. and i am also betting that with a little tuning that motor will be over 300hp.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Jun 10, 2015
#43
  • Jun 10, 2015
  • #43
rbohm said:
i am betting that most of the change came from the extra 100cfm carb. and i am also betting that with a little tuning that motor will be over 300hp.
Click to expand...

I will post the report when I get it. Their printer was out of ink. The report showed 3 curves, the initial test (attached to 1.post), then a run with the new headers, intake and underdrive pulley, and a third curve with the new carb. This was from tuning, so I don't think one could tune more. I will upload the results as soon as I get the report.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Jun 11, 2015
#44
  • Jun 11, 2015
  • #44
Here is the report.
Grey curve= as it was (Hipo manifolds, 500cfm carb, performer intake)
Middle red = Underdrive pulley, RPM Airgam intake, Scott Drake Tri-Y headers added
Top red = 600 cfm carb
 

Attachments

  • mustang-tune-2015.pdf
    mustang-tune-2015.pdf
    254.3 KB · Views: 319

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jun 13, 2015
#45
  • Jun 13, 2015
  • #45
Looks like a good street engine. Pretty significant gains! I'm sure you can really tell seat of the pants that the car is faster.

Are you happy with it?
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Jun 24, 2015
#46
  • Jun 24, 2015
  • #46
Yes, and I still have a very silent ride. You can only hear the wind when cruising in 60 mph!!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
98 V6 -> 289 engine swap
  • Cerdman
  • Dec 4, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
3K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 10, 2018
Cerdman
C
9
1/8th Mile Time?
  • 93lx308
  • Jan 12, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2018
RangerJoe
R
  • Locked
SOLD 1964 Weber Carbureted 289 Hipo $10k Firm
  • Robert Campbell
  • Sep 5, 2016
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
7K
Engine and Power Adder Sep 17, 2016
Robert Campbell
R
I Hate To Beat A Dead Horse But Could Someone Point Me Towards Some Roller Rockers?
  • 90lxwhite
  • Aug 3, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 4, 2014
rbohm
How much rwhp.. ?
  • Panhead
  • Apr 4, 2011
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
4K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Apr 22, 2011
Hack
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?