• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Dodge really muffed the new Charger

  • Thread starter Thread starter oilypushrod
  • Start date Start date Oct 3, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
T

TomServo92

New Member
Dec 22, 2003
517
0
0
Texas
Oct 4, 2004
#21
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #21
Jpjr said:
..well, it looks like it will have about 50hp more than the new mustang. they didn't muff that up at least.
Click to expand...

...and nearly 1/2 ton more weight, thus negating the HP advantage. It's not always about how much power you make but how weight that power has to lug around.
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Oct 4, 2004
#22
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #22
The 300 and Magnum look great. The new Charger looks lame. I'd much rather have the 300 or Magnum with the same drivetrain.
 
J

Jpjr

New Member
Aug 5, 2004
142
0
0
Oct 4, 2004
#23
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #23
Stangninjak said:
All i am saying is that I hope that chrysler will not follow suit of GM and at least style the Charger with some links to the past besides the name. From the concept picture I saw in car and driver, thats not happening.
Click to expand...

This is a good point that I agree with.. but I think that there is a balance however. I think that Ford has gone off the deep end with the retro-styling. I've made it no secret that the new Mustang is way too retro, and the only thing I have to base that from is the response that the Thunderbird got.

I think that the GTO has the same problem.. just in an opposite way. Like you said, it looks like a damn armored cavalier... but nonetheless.. like the Mustang... a very well built car. In fact its gotten rave reviews from every major car magazine.

From this perspective, I think that Chrysler has been right on the money. Their styling is fresh and exciting, but also not so curvy anymore. People are really responding to it..
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Oct 4, 2004
#24
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #24
The 300 is a cool luxury looking car for the masses and I applaud chrysler for that. The 300 was always a luxury "bankers hotrod" .

The magnum makes station wagons almost cool and I applaud them for that.

But bringing out a 4 door luxo barge and calling it a charger, even witht he future 425 horse srt-8 model is a disgrace. A charger is a legendary car that should have been brought back as a 2 door. Dodge charger is the epitome of 2 door muscle car name plates for many. Chrysler has a plethora of great names to use why waste Charger on a 4 door? But chrysler has wasted the charger name before anyone remember this POS with the charger name so I guess it could be worse.
 
O

Omegalock

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
616
0
0
Oct 4, 2004
#25
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #25
As has been said the 300 and the Magnum both were unique in their own way and their styling helped them out a ton. The 300C looks so good people that would typically want a 40-50k car are buying them up. The Magnum is a wagon and anything that remotely makes a wagon look cool is going to get major respect. The Charger in it's idea is the most conventional vehicle at it's core and they have missed the mark a bit with this one. It's not classy looking, it's not really a "cool" look either. It doesn't pull from it's history well.
It's big it's blunt and looks like a pig in the front AND it's going to be heavy.

I DO like the rear half of the car and the 4 door thing I could get over it's just the front end is so...bleh...

That's the one thing about the internet you can get a pretty good feeling on how the general public as a whole will receive a vehicle. The GTO bared that out as did the 300C. The GTOs buzz was fairly negative and it didn't start selling until they started discounting them pretty deeply. The 300C had a very positive buzz among the different boards and viola...people are buying them up pretty quickly. The Charger even on Mopar boards is getting hammered unmercifully so I have to say I think a few people here and there will be buying them but for the most part I think they will be sitting on the lots some what until they get marked down.
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Oct 4, 2004
#26
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #26
Omegalock said:
The Charger even on Mopar boards is getting hammered unmercifully so I have to say I think a few people here and there will be buying them but for the most part I think they will be sitting on the lots some what until they get marked down.
Click to expand...

Yeah, on my Mopar board there is one resident defender of the new Charger and about 100 other people beating up on it and saying they're gonna buy a Mustang instead (I'm one of them). I think DC could have gotten away with blah styling and two doors or great styling and four doors but they can't get away with lame styling and four doors. I'm waiting to see what the Magnum sedan looks like (hope they have a Hemi cop package in the sedan), and the 300C coupe.
 
C

calypsocoral302

New Member
Jul 2, 2004
64
0
0
Philadelphia, PA
Oct 4, 2004
#27
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #27
66Satellite said:
Yeah, on my Mopar board there is one resident defender of the new Charger and about 100 other people beating up on it and saying they're gonna buy a Mustang instead (I'm one of them). I think DC could have gotten away with blah styling and two doors or great styling and four doors but they can't get away with lame styling and four doors. I'm waiting to see what the Magnum sedan looks like (hope they have a Hemi cop package in the sedan), and the 300C coupe.
Click to expand...

Umm...

... what, exactly, is the point of a Magnum sedan when the Charger technically IS a Magnum sedan?

On another point...

...just about everybody has been missing the real point of the GTO and Charger-- they aren't meant to look like the originals. If the originals were continued non-stop to this day, I can GUARANTEE you they would look NOTHING like the originals.

How much like a '68 Camaro did the '96 Camaro look?

How much like a '68 Mustang did the '93 Mustang look?

I'm satisfied that the GTO looks like what it would look like if it were continued non-stop to this day.

Let's also not forget that 2-doors were the big mainstream market back then. 4-doors are the big mainstream market now. Thus, it isn't really that far-fetched that the new Charger is, in fact, a modern interpretation of the old Charger for today's 4-door-driven market.
 

Mach460

Founding Member
Oct 25, 2001
423
0
0
Ayer, MA
Oct 4, 2004
#28
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #28
calypsocoral302 said:
Umm...

... what, exactly, is the point of a Magnum sedan when the Charger technically IS a Magnum sedan?

On another point...

...just about everybody has been missing the real point of the GTO and Charger-- they aren't meant to look like the originals. If the originals were continued non-stop to this day, I can GUARANTEE you they would look NOTHING like the originals.

How much like a '68 Camaro did the '96 Camaro look?

How much like a '68 Mustang did the '93 Mustang look?

I'm satisfied that the GTO looks like what it would look like if it were continued non-stop to this day.

Let's also not forget that 2-doors were the big mainstream market back then. 4-doors are the big mainstream market now. Thus, it isn't really that far-fetched that the new Charger is, in fact, a modern interpretation of the old Charger for today's 4-door-driven market.
Click to expand...

Given the success of the Magnum and the 300C, if a Charger did come to pass, then look out, the Mustang will have a real tough time of it.
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Oct 4, 2004
#29
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #29
It's been confirmed by DC.

http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=100949
 

Mach460

Founding Member
Oct 25, 2001
423
0
0
Ayer, MA
Oct 4, 2004
#30
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #30
66Satellite said:
It's been confirmed by DC.

http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=100949
Click to expand...


Yeah I noticed..I edited my post post haste...lol
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Oct 4, 2004
#31
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #31
calypsocoral302 said:
Umm...

... what, exactly, is the point of a Magnum sedan when the Charger technically IS a Magnum sedan?

On another point...

...just about everybody has been missing the real point of the GTO and Charger-- they aren't meant to look like the originals. If the originals were continued non-stop to this day, I can GUARANTEE you they would look NOTHING like the originals.

How much like a '68 Camaro did the '96 Camaro look?

How much like a '68 Mustang did the '93 Mustang look?

I'm satisfied that the GTO looks like what it would look like if it were continued non-stop to this day.

Let's also not forget that 2-doors were the big mainstream market back then. 4-doors are the big mainstream market now. Thus, it isn't really that far-fetched that the new Charger is, in fact, a modern interpretation of the old Charger for today's 4-door-driven market.
Click to expand...

If it's gonna be four doors anyway I'd rather have a Magnum sedan because it would cleaner looking, cheaper and be more of a sleeper. Two doors sell just fine and are more appropriate for the performance oriented segment--BMW even stopped making the 4 door M3 cause it didn't sell very well. And one of the reason people are excited about the 05 Mustang is that it looks so much like the 60s Mustangs. The 99 Charger concept had tons of cues from the 68 Charger and was a huge hit on the show circuit.
 
C

calypsocoral302

New Member
Jul 2, 2004
64
0
0
Philadelphia, PA
Oct 4, 2004
#32
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #32
66Satellite said:
If it's gonna be four doors anyway I'd rather have a Magnum sedan because it would cleaner looking, cheaper and be more of a sleeper. Two doors sell just fine and are more appropriate for the performance oriented segment--BMW even stopped making the 4 door M3 cause it didn't sell very well. And one of the reason people are excited about the 05 Mustang is that it looks so much like the 60s Mustangs. The 99 Charger concept had tons of cues from the 68 Charger and was a huge hit on the show circuit.
Click to expand...

Depends. Let's see how well the M5 and M6 sell against each other...

Dodge has placed themselves in a very unique portion of the market-- cars for new family men who don't want to give up their 'stangs and camaros. In this context, the new Charger fits in nicely.

Personally, I thought the 99 Charger concept was nauseatingly-gaudy. Didn't help that it looked a lot like a Camaro, too.
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Oct 4, 2004
#33
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #33
Mach460 said:
Given the success of the Magnum and the 300C, if a Charger did come to pass, then look out, the Mustang will have a real tough time of it.
Click to expand...

Dude that is so right, a 4 door $45,000 charger srt-8 is going to steal a whole lot of mustang sales ford better watch it. It might even steal as many sales as the cadillac cts-v.
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Oct 4, 2004
#34
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #34
Who wants a 4 door muscle car? Can a four door car even be called a muscle car?
 
P

PerformanceRed

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
136
0
0
In a $3 Million Dollar House. George Bush will def
Oct 4, 2004
#35
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #35
The front of the Dodge Charger looks like a Magnum. There's no way that I would buy a Dodge Charger if it looked like a Magnum. I like the original concept design of the Dodge Charger. I would rather own a Mustang if the Charger is going to look like an overglorified Magnum.
 
O

oilypushrod

New Member
Jul 12, 2004
60
0
0
Oct 5, 2004
#36
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #36
I dont mind the front end of the new charger, but the rest is so BLAH.
 

NIN

New Member
Dec 4, 2002
452
0
0
moorhead MN
Oct 5, 2004
#37
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #37
The only thing that dodge makes that looks any good it the viper period. Plus, the first gen looks better.
 
S

Sean`03///Zed4

New Member
Jan 29, 2004
39
0
0
Oct 5, 2004
#38
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #38
Yes I was trying to remember the MAgnum. That new Charger is most possibly based off the Magnum i.e. un hatched version. If you look at side profile it looks similiar. Low windows. It must be based of the same platfrom. They will have the same wheelbase, just badged a charger. It may have a stick but my bet is it will be a carryover of Benz suspension and tranmission parts. The only +ve good thing is it should have IRS.
 

Lawman85

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2001
126
0
0
Oct 5, 2004
#39
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #39
calypsocoral302 said:
Dodge has placed themselves in a very unique portion of the market-- cars for new family men who don't want to give up their 'stangs and camaros. In this context, the new Charger fits in nicely.

:
Click to expand...

Everyone is forgetting that point. I own a 2004 Durango with the Hemi. That is a bad ass motor. Any SUV that can do a standing burn-out at a red light without power breaking is pretty cool. I've also driven the Magnum and 300 and they are both hits.

Dodge's target market with these cars are us 30 to 50 year olds who have the money but don't want to buy a Town Car or Crown vic. They are giving us a "cool way out" of mini vans and SUV's. I agree they probably shouldn't call the Magnum sedan a Charger.

Dodge will also re-enter the police interceptor battle with the new Charger. They have already contacted some agencies about it. It will only have the 340 hp Hemi and not the 425. That is another reason for the 4 doors. Based on Dodge's recen success I think it will be a big hit. Dealers can't keep the Magnum or 300 on the lots. There are 2 dealerships near me that have a waiting list for a Magnum!!!!
 

Chongus

Banned
Oct 5, 2004
25
0
0
Oct 5, 2004
#40
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #40
About GNAA:
GNAA (GAY ****** ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the first organization which gathers GAY ******S from all over America and abroad for one common goal - being GAY ******S.

Are you GAY?
Are you a ******?
Are you a GAY ******?

If you answered "Yes" to all of the above questions, then GNAA (GAY ****** ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!
Join GNAA (GAY ****** ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) today, and enjoy all the benefits of being a full-time GNAA member.
GNAA (GAY ****** ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the fastest-growing GAY ****** community with THOUSANDS of members all over United States of America and the World! You, too, can be a part of GNAA if you join today!

Why not? It's quick and easy - only 3 simple steps!

First, you have to obtain a copy of GAY******S FROM OUTER SPACE THE MOVIE and watch it. You can download the movie (~130mb) using BitTorrent.
Second, you need to succeed in posting a GNAA First Post on slashdot.org, a popular "news for trolls" website.
Third, you need to join the official GNAA irc channel #GNAA on irc.gnaa.us, and apply for membership.
Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up today! Upon submitting your application, you will be required to submit links to your successful First Post, and you will be tested on your knowledge of GAY******S FROM OUTER SPACE.

If you are having trouble locating #GNAA, the official GAY ****** ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be on a wrong irc network. The correct network is ******NET, and you can connect to irc.gnaa.us as our official server. Follow this link if you are using an irc client such as mIRC.

If you have mod points and would like to support GNAA, please moderate this post up.

Code:

.________________________________________________.
| ______________________________________._a,____ | Press contact:
| _______a_._______a_______aj#0s_____aWY!400.___ | Gary Niger
| __ad#7!!*P____a.d#0a____#!-_#0i___.#!__W#0#___ | gary_niger@gnaa.us
| _j#'_.00#,___4#dP_"#,__j#,__0#Wi___*00P!_"#L,_ | GNAA Corporate Headquarters
| _"#ga#9!01___"#01__40,_"4Lj#!_4#g_________"01_ | 143 Rolloffle Avenue
| ________"#,___*@`__-N#____`___-!^_____________ | Tarzana, California 91356
| _________#1__________?________________________ |
| _________j1___________________________________ | All other inquiries:
| ____a,___jk_GAY_******_ASSOCIATION_OF_AMERICA_ | Enid Indian
| ____!4yaa#l___________________________________ | enid_indian@gnaa.us
| ______-"!^____________________________________ | GNAA World Headquarters
` _______________________________________________' 160-0023 Japan Tokyo-to Shinjuku-ku Nishi-Shinjuku 3-20-2

Copyright (c) 2003-2004 Gay ****** Association of America
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Convertible A-pillar weatherstrip issues
  • thiefofcheese
  • Oct 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
348
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
AeroCoupe
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
737
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
J
'96 Cobra: A/C gets weak and engine misfires under load when warm
  • jruhnke
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
2
Views
320
SVT Tech Forum Nov 20, 2025
nickyb
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
461
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?