• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Doing Shelby drop

  • Thread starter Thread starter 65fastbackresto
  • Start date Start date Aug 24, 2007
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
S

Soaring1

Banned
Jan 3, 2003
144
1
0
Texas
Aug 29, 2007
#41
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #41
2bav8 said:
Hey guys, were not going to have a vendor arguing match.
Click to expand...

Sic 'em Mod. Give 'em hell.
 
S

Soaring1

Banned
Jan 3, 2003
144
1
0
Texas
Aug 29, 2007
#42
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #42
Tubo3 said:
Actually, as has already been pointed out Carroll Shelby never invented the "drop"
It was developed by Klaus Arning, a Ford suspension engineer, for use on the Ford Factory Rally Team Falcons, 63-64-65. It was part of the "Tech", Ford turned over to CS, for the GT 350. Thats why so many of us refer to it as the "Arning Drop"
Glen, you'll have to watch yourself, the guys in this forum are pretty sharp.
Click to expand...

Well, I have been on classic or vintage Mustang forums for over 12 years now since I got my 65, and have about 30 thousand posts. And, I have never heard of an Arning drop or a UCA drop. You may be right, but I have just never heard of the Shelby drop referred to as any of those. Now, who is "Us?"
 
B

BlwnGazkit

Member
Nov 3, 2006
153
0
16
Richmond, VA
Aug 29, 2007
#43
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #43
Well I've heard it called all 3 of those names before...

And the difference between the two templates is how far back the new holes are placed. The 66 template shows the holes dropped and relocated back 1/8" while the 67+ template shows the holes simply dropped.
 

Tubo(2-bo)

Member
Mar 25, 2004
279
0
16
Ft Walton Beach FL.
Aug 29, 2007
#44
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #44
By saying "us" I'm only recognizing a broadly accepted termonology, being used on any of the Mustang forums I frequent.
I applaude you on having posted 30k+times, though that in itself doesn't qualify you as an expert.
As a high school kid of 16 years, I was hanging on the chain link fence, holding back spectators, at Green Valley Raceway, in Smithfield Texas. On Feb 14 1965. You know, what went on there, that day don't you?
Ken Miles drove the GT 350 in its first race ever. I've always been enthralled, by Shelby's, their lore & history. Sports Car Graphic Magazine was my bible, and I devoured all I could from it. Heck I even remember, some of it. Though, that doesn't make me an expert in itself. But the Rally Falcons, at Monte Carlo 1964, & the Tour de France Mustangs of 1965, had the "Arning Drop".
If you havent heard of that before, possibly your Knowledge of 12 years, has a few gaps in it. I've had a 65 2+2 of one sort or another since 1983, and I'm still learning things, I havent heard of before.
Glen, Its just a matter of learning more Tech.
 
S

Soaring1

Banned
Jan 3, 2003
144
1
0
Texas
Aug 29, 2007
#45
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #45
And I thank you Turbo. That is good to know. I was a college student at UT Austin back when the first 65 Mustang was displayed on the floor of the
Ford house in Austin, and I remember telling myself that I would own one of those one day.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Aug 29, 2007
#46
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #46
Soaring1 said:
Well, I have been on classic or vintage Mustang forums for over 12 years now since I got my 65, and have about 30 thousand posts. And, I have never heard of an Arning drop or a UCA drop. You may be right, but I have just never heard of the Shelby drop referred to as any of those. Now, who is "Us?"
Click to expand...
Don't be so shy, in fact pat yourself on the back whenever the opportunity presents itself. But also realize that some of the people on this forum have been involved with vintage Mustangs since they were new Mustangs.
 
N

NewStangOwnr

New Member
Aug 10, 2006
152
0
0
Aug 29, 2007
#47
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #47
I see where I messed up, I accidentaly drilled on the hole strait down and not back.

Got it now, looks good. Before and after pics to come.
 

Tubo(2-bo)

Member
Mar 25, 2004
279
0
16
Ft Walton Beach FL.
Aug 29, 2007
#48
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #48
Soaring1 said:
And I thank you Turbo. That is good to know. I was a college student at UT Austin back when the first 65 Mustang was displayed on the floor of the
Ford house in Austin, and I remember telling myself that I would own one of those one day.
Click to expand...
Back At Ya Soaring1, but please note,...its Tubo like 2-bo
 
S

Soaring1

Banned
Jan 3, 2003
144
1
0
Texas
Aug 29, 2007
#49
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #49
Tubo3 said:
Back At Ya Soaring1, but please note,...its Tubo like 2-bo
Click to expand...
Sorry 'bout dat Tubo. Must be my stigmatism.
 
D

Dazecars

Member
Jun 20, 2005
84
1
9
Aug 29, 2007
#50
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #50
Cyclone said:
No One has really seen them yet, and they are saying that everyone elses are better, I don't get that either, Not here to argue.
Click to expand...

Please don't misunderstand, I am in no way trying to argue with you or belittle your product, I am sure it is a quality piece that will inhanse the performance of many Mustangs. My hang up was with the "50 times better" comment
 
D

Dazecars

Member
Jun 20, 2005
84
1
9
Aug 29, 2007
#51
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #51
Soaring1 said:
I got Degins (Dennis) kit. Looks like it is all there and all I need to do is take my Advil and Glucosamine and get to work. Both those templates look the same to me. What is the difference between the 65-66 and the 67 up template?
Click to expand...

I have herd really good things about his disc brake swap. If you want a really good trick for removing the ball joints make one of these

You can take the nuts off the ball joints, place this tool between the two studs and expand the tool. The ball joints will pop loose with out having to use a pickle fork, having to pound on the end of the ball joint with a hammer, or damaging them. There are detailed instructions on how to make one (not that it is complicated ) at the bottom of my homemade spring compressor page. http://home.bresnan.net/%7Edazed/spring
 

Attachments

  • jointtool.webp
    57.3 KB · Views: 149
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Aug 29, 2007
#52
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #52
Hi guy's sorry I'm late. When I came up with my roller perch design in 2003, it got a lot of bashing, it's nothing new. I wish Marlon all the best.

I have been a long time advocate of moving the upper ball joint rearward instead of moving the lower ball joint forward to get more caster on a performance driven or track car. With the spindle mounted right next to the lower ball joint on the steering knuckle, moving the lower ball joint forward changes the wheelbase much more than moving the upper ball joint rearward. That in itself can cause some issues with the car, tire clearance being one of them.

We have done testing on a few 67-70 cars where we moved the upper ball joint rearward instead of moving the lower arm forward to add caster. What we did was add a single, or a couple of shims (we used washers) under the front bolt on a 67-70 Mustang. Same idea as the early cars used to get more caster by moving the upper ball joint rearward. It works well. The 67-70 cars had more caster without moving the lower ball joint forward and they drove great. No issues at all. We even did a test where we drilled the holes 1/8" rearwards instead of straight down on a 68 coup, like you do to the early cars. What happend with that is that we had to peen the rear of each shock tower to give more room for the grease gun. No more than a few hammer blows. Again, the testing was done on track or performance driven cars. The owner was very happy with the results. It let's you run a larger front tire than you could if you moved the lower arm forward alone to achieve the same amount of caster. None of this is very noticeable in the tech line either so it's almost vintage legal! Fun stuff!



John
 
6

66Runt

Member
Jun 11, 2005
680
2
18
Aug 29, 2007
#53
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #53
Question for Tubo

Tubo3 said:
Actually, as has already been pointed out Carroll Shelby never invented the "drop"
It was developed by Klaus Arning, a Ford suspension engineer, for use on the Ford Factory Rally Team Falcons, 63-64-65. It was part of the "Tech", Ford turned over to CS, for the GT 350. Thats why so many of us refer to it as the "Arning Drop"
Glen, you'll have to watch yourself, the guys in this forum are pretty sharp.
Click to expand...

Hi Tubo,
Quick question:
I've read in a few Mustang books, and also heard the comment made by respected Mustang enthusiasts over the years, that Klaus Arning actually designed the lowered position of the UCA to work in harmoney with the IRS being developed fo the Mustang at the same time. And that, as you stated, the first racing use was in the Rally Falcons.
Since this came from people whom I respect, I've pretty much "parroted" this comment over the 30+ years of my involvment with Mustangs, and now am questioning the validity of my information.
Do you have anything that confirms the design was specifically for the Rally cars?
I hate when I post mis-information, and would prefer to be corrected now.
Thank you Sir!
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Aug 30, 2007
#54
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #54
Opentracker,

Speaking of improving suspension designs...
Is it true you have a new roller spring perch design you are working on?
Thought I heard something about a new design a little bit ago.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 30, 2007
#55
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #55
Soaring1 said:
Well, I have been on classic or vintage Mustang forums for over 12 years now since I got my 65, and have about 30 thousand posts. And, I have never heard of an Arning drop or a UCA drop. You may be right, but I have just never heard of the Shelby drop referred to as any of those. Now, who is "Us?"
Click to expand...

Arning drop here.
Also heard UCA drop, and the notorious, erroneous, Shelby drop.
 
D

Dazecars

Member
Jun 20, 2005
84
1
9
Aug 30, 2007
#56
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #56
66Runt said:
Hi Tubo,
Quick question:
I've read in a few Mustang books, and also heard the comment made by respected Mustang enthusiasts over the years, that Klaus Arning actually designed the lowered position of the UCA to work in harmoney with the IRS being developed fo the Mustang at the same time. And that, as you stated, the first racing use was in the Rally Falcons.
Since this came from people whom I respect, I've pretty much "parroted" this comment over the 30+ years of my involvment with Mustangs, and now am questioning the validity of my information.
Do you have anything that confirms the design was specifically for the Rally cars?
I hate when I post mis-information, and would prefer to be corrected now.
Thank you Sir!
Click to expand...

Arning did develop the drop as part of a performance suspension package that did include IRS. Many 63 and 64 Falcons were tested on and it was these cars that the Mustang IRS was installed. 4 or 5 cars (all falcons but 1) got the original Ford IRS put under them.
 

Attachments

  • OriginalMustangIRS.webp
    159.2 KB · Views: 156
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Aug 30, 2007
#57
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #57
2bav8 said:
Opentracker,

Speaking of improving suspension designs...
Is it true you have a new roller spring perch design you are working on?
Thought I heard something about a new design a little bit ago.
Click to expand...


It's true. We have three new roller spring perch designs. The roller perch we sell now will called a street roller perch. The other three will be an Autocross roller perch, a double roller drag racing perch and a double roller road racing perch. The double roller perches will let the shock pivot on it's own set of bearings, independent of the set the spring rides on. The testing is being done right now. I don't have any photo's to share but they are cool looking.

We have some other new stuff in the works too, like a page for Falcons only.


John
 

Tubo(2-bo)

Member
Mar 25, 2004
279
0
16
Ft Walton Beach FL.
Aug 30, 2007
#58
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #58
66Runt said:
Hi Tubo,
Quick question:
I've read in a few Mustang books, and also heard the comment made by respected Mustang enthusiasts over the years, that Klaus Arning actually designed the lowered position of the UCA to work in harmoney with the IRS being developed fo the Mustang at the same time. And that, as you stated, the first racing use was in the Rally Falcons.
Since this came from people whom I respect, I've pretty much "parroted" this comment over the 30+ years of my involvment with Mustangs, and now am questioning the validity of my information.
Do you have anything that confirms the design was specifically for the Rally cars?
I hate when I post mis-information, and would prefer to be corrected now.
Thank you Sir!
Click to expand...

Any documentation I had(Sports car magazine collection starting1962), was thrown away, while I was in Boot Camp1967.
I have run across refferences on the net from time to time, but its just one of those odd ball facts, that stick in my head, while much more important things are lost forever.
Our family bought, a new 63 1/2 Falcon Futura, 260, 4spd, and seeing(in magazines) the same type of car being rallyed in europe, really sparked my interest, Thats how it started for me.
Admittedly not much tech there.
 
6

66Runt

Member
Jun 11, 2005
680
2
18
Aug 30, 2007
#59
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #59
Thanks Tubo

Tubo3 said:
Any documentation I had(Sports car magazine collection starting1962), was thrown away, while I was in Boot Camp1967.
I have run across refferences on the net from time to time, but its just one of those odd ball facts, that stick in my head, while much more important things are lost forever.
Our family bought, a new 63 1/2 Falcon Futura, 260, 4spd, and seeing(in magazines) the same type of car being rallyed in europe, really sparked my interest, Thats how it started for me.
Admittedly not much tech there.
Click to expand...

Well, that backs up the same information I have read and heard as well, which makes me feel more secure in repeating it.
Thanks man!
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Aug 30, 2007
#60
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #60
Opentracker said:
It's true. We have three new roller spring perch designs. The roller perch we sell now will called a street roller perch. The other three will be an Autocross roller perch, a double roller drag racing perch and a double roller road racing perch. The double roller perches will let the shock pivot on it's own set of bearings, independent of the set the spring rides on. The testing is being done right now. I don't have any photo's to share but they are cool looking.

We have some other new stuff in the works too, like a page for Falcons only.


John
Click to expand...


sweet John, i may have to get me a set of those for the 69 cougar. i may have also found me a 68 ranchero project as well, maybe we can compare ranchero notes if i do get it.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

S
Mach 1 iac valve in a 4.6 gt
  • solodriverz
  • Jun 3, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
38
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 5, 2026
squeak93
S
Fuel rail help
  • stang9150
  • Mar 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
261
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 5, 2026
stang9150
S
S
Oil cooler delete 4v 4.6 1999 cobra mustang
  • sami12
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
285
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 25, 2026
GOvert
G
Suspension Setting Front Alignment - Do I care about the rear's thrust angle?
  • dan50
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
297
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Kid wita 5oh
Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
279
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?