Don't tell me it's not possible!

1

11sec5ohh

New Member

Jan 7, 2004

14

0

1

Washington D.C.

Mar 2, 2008

#1

• Mar 2, 2008

• #1

1989 GT 5.0
AFR Aluminum Heads
FMS RR's
FMS Z cam
GT-40 upper/lower intake
FMS T-body and mass-air
FMS 30lb injectors
FMS 255lbh fuel pump
FMS shorty headers
BBK X-pipe
2 chamber flowmasters

A few more goodies, but the car is all motor with the stock shortblock that has
89k miles on it.

370rwhp
406rwt

Just ran 11.77@114 on drag radials (smoking the tires in second) At opening day today. Flat-foot shifting cost me my clutch and I had to coast through my second pass and limp home, guess FMS stage 3 isnt enough..... Will order new tomorrow and hopefully be back bangin' gears in no time.

 

Flavadave4

Active Member

Nov 28, 2003

1,044

21

49

Utica, NY

Mar 2, 2008

#2

• Mar 2, 2008

• #2

Whats not possible?


What size heads are those? 205's? THose nuimbers seem pretty big for a N/A 302

 

Flavadave4

Active Member

Nov 28, 2003

1,044

21

49

Utica, NY

Mar 2, 2008

#3

• Mar 2, 2008

• #3

Still thinking...

I can believe the times but those dyno numbers are a little too big...did you have it run on a dyno-jet?

 

87coupe50

Member

Feb 10, 2008

105

1

16

WAYNESBORO, PA

Mar 2, 2008

#4

• Mar 2, 2008

• #4

Must be all about the tires. Took mine to the track yesterday and the best I could do was 13.48 on street radials. The launch was killin me. It was my first time ever at the track so I guess it's not bad. I got a bid in on a set of slicks for the track. Had a blast and will definately be going back!!!

 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists

Jul 11, 2003

480

0

17

Senoia, GA

Mar 2, 2008

#5

• Mar 2, 2008

• #5

I'd like to see dyno graph conformation.

 

25thmustang

Mustang Master

Sep 5, 2003

2,021

85

99

Montgomery, NY

Mar 2, 2008

#6

• Mar 2, 2008

• #6

Seems like a vague way of telling us what you ran. My guess is you didn't just bolt on some AFR 165s, some bolt ons and made 370 and went 11s blowing the tires.

Just my opinion.

 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member

Nov 10, 2004

1,351

59

68

Maryland

Mar 3, 2008

#7

• Mar 3, 2008

• #7

what track did you go to? mason dixon opened yesterday

 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"

Founding Member

Aug 7, 2002

9,516

6

99

Arkansas

Mar 3, 2008

#8

• Mar 3, 2008

• #8

Dyno sheet?

Give a little more detail

What heads?
What intake?
What throttle body?
How many accessories?
Race weight?
Compression?

As of right now, I think it is not possible

 

HankyGT

Member

Jan 15, 2006

81

3

6

Warren, OH

Mar 3, 2008

#9

• Mar 3, 2008

• #9

sounds like you forgot the 75 shot....

I don't see those #s at all from an otherwise stock 302. Even dynojet #'s you're off(+) by like 50rwhp.

If a 75 shot was used I could see ALL of that making sense.

 

88mouse

New Member

Apr 18, 2007

630

0

0

Mooresville nc

Mar 3, 2008

#10

• Mar 3, 2008

• #10

 

bynummustang

Seen my other Jackstand?

Jul 24, 2005

1

2

69

NC State University

Mar 3, 2008

#11

• Mar 3, 2008

• #11

 

1

11sec5ohh

New Member

Jan 7, 2004

14

0

1

Washington D.C.

Mar 3, 2008

#12

• Mar 3, 2008

• #12

Other goodies include a 100 shot NX wet kit in which the numbers were made on a dyno-jet, the shot is set up for second gear-to finish. Everyone says that you cannot see those kinda numbers from an N/A 302....guess they might be right. A Procharger will be bolted on next in place of the nitrous.

 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman

Dec 26, 2006

0

10

49

Thomasville, ga

Mar 3, 2008

#13

• Mar 3, 2008

• #13

everyone is refering to NA as NO power adder. guess they should have been more specific

 

bloopbloob

Member

Sep 27, 2006

578

4

16

Alberta

Mar 3, 2008

#14

• Mar 3, 2008

• #14

well naturally aspirated means just engine to me, no forced induction or nitrous...... not sure what others think, but i thought that was a pretty standard definintion....

 

NIKwoaC

中國製造

15 Year Member

Oct 31, 2006

5,525

943

214

Chengdu Province

Mar 3, 2008

#15

• Mar 3, 2008

• #15

Maaaan I was gettin all antsy in my pantsy thinkin it was some kind of high compression screamer... Guess that wouldn't make much sense with a stock short block and an off the shelf cam tho. Sweet car, nonetheless.

I won't tell you its not possible

 

25thmustang

Mustang Master

Sep 5, 2003

2,021

85

99

Montgomery, NY

Mar 4, 2008

#16

• Mar 4, 2008

• #16

Nitrous does not equal N/A in 99.9% of peoples books. Now that we know there's a 100 shot involved the numbers seem average to me. Nice work on 11s, but nothing really out of the ordinary or amazing.

 

Flavadave4

Active Member

Nov 28, 2003

1,044

21

49

Utica, NY

Mar 4, 2008

#17

• Mar 4, 2008

• #17

It would have been nice if the thread starter would have stated the whole setup in the begining...seems to have made things more believable.

 

25thmustang

Mustang Master

Sep 5, 2003

2,021

85

99

Montgomery, NY

Mar 4, 2008

#18

• Mar 4, 2008

• #18

Yeah, but at least we believe the numbers now.

 

Skizza

Member

Jan 27, 2004

43

0

6

Greenfield, IN

Mar 4, 2008

#19

• Mar 4, 2008

• #19

Wow dude, I was astonished for like 30 seconds. What a bummer. Nice run though.

 

aod92

New Member

Jun 4, 2005

104

0

0

Mar 4, 2008

#20

• Mar 4, 2008

• #20

There was no way you were getting a dyno number like that without the nitrous. Even with the nitrous its a good number. My car went 11.67@112mph with h/c/i 100 shot dry kit and an Aod.