• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Drifference between 302 stroker and 351W?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Luca11
  • Start date Start date Jul 1, 2006

Luca11

Member
Jul 1, 2006
60
0
6
Chicago
Jul 1, 2006
#1
  • Jul 1, 2006
  • #1
Hey all, My name is Luca I have a stock 92 notchback. My question is, whats the differents between a bored 302 stroked, and a 351W bored & Stroked. When i say differents, i mean in money & Horse...
 

83Mustang427TT

New Member
Jan 18, 2006
162
0
0
Jul 1, 2006
#2
  • Jul 1, 2006
  • #2
351 stroked is pretty much the same in terms of money as a 302 stroked the horsepower is different of course you get more from a 351 you'd have to get the headers and the oilpan and intake but if your gonna buy one for a 302 anyway it isnt that bad
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
Jul 1, 2006
#3
  • Jul 1, 2006
  • #3
Depends on your goals and how radical you wanna go.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Jul 1, 2006
#4
  • Jul 1, 2006
  • #4
a 351 or a stoker 351 will generally make more power than 302 based strokers...

Say your wanting to have the joys of having a 351. but are having trouble find the oil pan, a good rebuildable 351 engine, or the swap headers its just a big mess. got to mess with all the accesories also.

a great alternative is to stroke your 302 to 347, almost those 351 cubes you want, but you get the easy of using the same 302 style headers, pan and all the accessories, the engine will look just like a 302 but its got power hiding within.

almost cheaper to stroke a 302, a good rotating assembly can be had for a little over a grand. would cost lots more to build a decent 351, and have to get all the parts to do the swap.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jul 2, 2006
#5
  • Jul 2, 2006
  • #5
The cost is going to be the same.

The only parts that you will replace when doing a serious 351w stroker (that would not be replaced for a 302 stroker), 1 bracket (less than $50) for p/s and an oil pan.

If you are going to build equivelant setups, and compare apples to apples, then the other parts would be new for both options.
flywheel
damper
injectors
intake


Check out my site (in my sig), I have a writeup on the 351w conversion in a fox.

jason
 
R

R2D2

Jul 2, 2006
#6
  • Jul 2, 2006
  • #6
Heres what need for the swap http://sbftech.com/index.php/topic,39.0.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
344
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
E
Serpentine ac bracket differences
  • EspaceF1Fan
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
1
Views
130
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 1, 2026
OX1
O
J
Engine Tuning...?
  • justadude07
  • May 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
226
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
Blown88GT
R
Progress Thread 351w stroker rotating assembly and build
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
912
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2025
Noobz347
D
351w swap shifter is not lining up
  • duckman0926
  • Aug 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
192
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 7, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?