• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

DSS306 or 331!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter SN95FREAK
  • Start date Start date Jul 31, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

SN95FREAK

New Member
Jul 29, 2008
9
0
1
North Carolina
Jul 31, 2008
#1
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #1
I'm going to purchase one of the two so who has some info. on them. The car is a 94 gt automatic daily driver.
The car has got to be smog legal because I'm from texas but currently stationed in camp lejeune n.c
so I'm kinda limited on some of the things that I can do and gas mileage Who gives a f*!#. I would love to have a power adder but that just wont fit in the budget so N/A it is.
combo I'm looking at:
DSS 331 or 306 w/ afr185's/cam??
gt 40 intake/70mmTB/75mm MAF
24lb injectors
tremec 500 5speed
Thanks
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
40
98
MAINE
Jul 31, 2008
#2
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #2
Bigger Cubes FTW!!!
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Jul 31, 2008
#3
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #3
While I haven't installed either, I remember someone here getting a 306 and being really unimpressed with it.. You're only getting 4c.i. over stock so you're not gonna feel much. I also vote for a 331. If you want a 347 CHP has one that doesn't burn oil AND is smog legal (if that's an issue for you).

CHP Shortblocks - search for 347-E for the smog legal kit.
 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member
Apr 9, 2003
559
0
16
Jul 31, 2008
#4
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #4
347 or 331

306 if just a fresh motor of what you already have and really it the same money
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jul 31, 2008
#5
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #5
For me it came down to what H/C/I I was going to run. I wanted to keep what I already had and it was ok for a stock stroke. Jumping up in cubes whould have meant a good bit left on the table. For my goals and what I already had I went with a 306.
 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member
Apr 9, 2003
559
0
16
Jul 31, 2008
#6
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #6
you cant hurt any combo that i know of with more cubes.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jul 31, 2008
#7
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #7
What I meant was that really more cubes would in my eyes need better H/C/I to get the most out of it. Yes you can put 185's on a 306 and it will run well...put them on a 331/347 and it will probably run even better yet. If you have say smaller valve edlb. heads or gt40's (iron or older alum.) they will be better matched to a 302 than a 331-347. They will work on a larger motor but IMHO it would be a "weaker" stroker motor. Good numbers can be had...look at killers new setup but his has always been a fairly good runner and I dont see his numbers being the avg. plus even he is moving to larger heads to get the most out of his combo.

That and my goals would be do-able with a 306. If your simply looking for 275-300 a 302 is fine. If your looking for around the 350 mark...stroke it.

It comes down to what the goals are.
 

StadEMS3

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 19, 2003
228
43
49
Mechanicsville, MD
Jul 31, 2008
#8
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #8
I got the DSS 331 kit- strong motor. Only thing slowing me up right now is my stock Cobra intake. I went with the 331 because of the 306, like previously said, is just a freshen up. I've heard of issues with 347s due to oil leaks and pistons are thin at the top.
 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member
Apr 9, 2003
559
0
16
Jul 31, 2008
#9
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #9
since they both are just about the same money I say even if you dont have the proper supporting mods now you always can expand.

I went so far with my build I regret not going with a 351 stroked to 427
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 31, 2008
#10
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #10
347 for the win

Mo cubes is Mo Bettah

Grady
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jul 31, 2008
#11
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #11
I hear you on that...I have a bottle and even with the 302 I should be getting close to the blocks limits, even if I only ever hit 275rwhp off the bottle I have a 175 shot that math is getting close even if I only see 130-150rwhp with 175 jets...add a stroker (and my very strong feelings that a stroker should be done in a aftermarket block) and power adder I would be far to scared for the block.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 31, 2008
#12
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #12
Go for the cubes, if you can afford the new rotating assembly and new flywheel/balancer.

I personally went 306 because of a budget, reused a lot of parts and I did not have to buy a new flywheel/balancer.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 31, 2008
#13
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #13
5spd GT said:
Go for the cubes, if you can afford the new rotating assembly and new flywheel/balancer.

I personally went 306 because of a budget, reused a lot of parts and I did not have to buy a new flywheel/balancer.
Click to expand...

Very good point and as usual .........

The application dictates the end result

Take my sig combo for example

If something happened to my OEM block

A B&Bed 306 would make a lot of sense

My current stuff is too little for a 347
so
A 306 would give me the most bang for the buck spent

You just gotta think this stuff from every angle
and
Long term plans or goals will help you NOT to spend needless money :Word:

If I was gonna build a 5.0 blocked NA STREET COMBO
and
I had to do it from scratch with no current parts

An OEM blocked 347 pumping out 375 to 400 to the wheels would be
great for a week end toy as I see it

Well within the limits for the block
and
You won't break the bank doing it
also
With a good tune ... drivability should be pretty good
even
Fairly good gas mileage for those short road trips

True ... it will lope a bit at idle ... but ... that can't be helped

Grady
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jul 31, 2008
#14
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #14
Sidebar: its amazing to me how the 347 "oil issues" rumors still exist. I read about that when i first joined this site and guys proved it otherwise. Is that EVER going to die?!?!?!?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 1, 2008
#15
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #15
nmcgrawj said:
Sidebar: its amazing to me how the 347 "oil issues" rumors still exist. I read about that when i first joined this site and guys proved it otherwise. Is that EVER going to die?!?!?!?
Click to expand...

Sure ... it will die around the same time you quit seeing threads like

How do I put a Fox pcm in my 94-95 Stang

Grady
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 1, 2008
#16
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #16
final5-0 said:
Sure ... it will die around the same time you quit seeing threads like

How do I put a Fox pcm in my 94-95 Stang

Grady
Click to expand...

good one! lol
 

donkey_punch

New Member
Jan 16, 2004
565
0
0
northern****ingjersey
Aug 1, 2008
#17
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #17
or like the famous guess my horsepower threads.


back to the topic.

i also vote for the 331.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Aug 1, 2008
#18
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #18
Chythar said:
While I haven't installed either, I remember someone here getting a 306 and being really unimpressed with it.. You're only getting 4c.i. over stock so you're not gonna feel much. I also vote for a 331. If you want a 347 CHP has one that doesn't burn oil AND is smog legal (if that's an issue for you).
Click to expand...

That was prolly me, lol. I wanted more low end. Period. The 306 didn't do what I thought it would but it is all a learning process. The stang also FEELS heavy to me and felt heavy with the 306. But I am a streeter too.
 

94mustangcobra

Member
Sep 29, 2006
126
0
16
Valdosta, GA
Aug 1, 2008
#19
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #19
347 is my vote
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 1, 2008
#20
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #20
if gas mileage is an issue, a 306 is probably more likely be a little better than a 331 would be ...

just one more think to keep in mind

if i were doing it though, i'd probably go low compression 311 so i could run 87 octane and have the option of boosting it later.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
4 Hole Bosch Injectors max HP and Tune -4.6 PI
  • Png1978
  • Jul 23, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 10, 2022
Chipss36
F
1993 Cobra flooding
  • FireFoxCobra_SVT93
  • May 20, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2023
nickyb
T
Engine 306 to 331
  • Treachery
  • Jul 1, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 2, 2020
nickyb
J
Need Help: 95 Mustang GT Engine Rebuild
  • jurban421
  • Jul 25, 2021
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jul 25, 2021
jurban421
J
Engine New to Mustangs, guidance needed on fault codes 47 & 45
  • sUdz6.0pwrstk
  • Sep 30, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 23, 2021
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?