• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

dumb question but where do I place a floor jack

  • Thread starter Thread starter jerry S
  • Start date Start date Jun 23, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Jun 23, 2009
#1
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #1
to lift my front end off the ground? Did the original jacks lift from the bumper or behind the wheels?
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Jun 23, 2009
#2
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #2
I either put it on the subframe just after is starts to curve down or on the lower control arm if its a smaller floof jack.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 23, 2009
#3
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #3
At the front under the frame rail where the firewall meets the floor. At the back the rear torque box, where the front of the spring is attached.

If you jack the bumper on a Mustang, the only thing that's going up is the bumper.
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Jun 23, 2009
#4
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #4
2+2GT said:
At the front under the frame rail where the firewall meets the floor. At the back the rear torque box, where the front of the spring is attached.

If you jack the bumper on a Mustang, the only thing that's going up is the bumper.
Click to expand...

That is why I asked about the original jacks. I recall my parents having a 1974 lesaber and a Merc. Marquis and the tire jack for one or the other or both lifted the front and back ends at a slot in the bumper. My bumpers are out for re-chroming so I could not look at them to see if they had the slot or not.
 

rusty428cj

10 Year Member
Sep 29, 2007
943
265
104
Port Richey Fl
Jun 23, 2009
#5
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #5
I have always used a board under the strut rod brackets where they attach to the frame.
 

Platonic Solid

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
1,960
5
39
CT-USA
Jun 23, 2009
#6
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #6
2+2GT said:
... At the back the rear torque box, where the front of the spring is attached.
Click to expand...
That's how I discovered my 72 coupe was no longer safe to drive. Jack went up, but car did not.
 

yeloxr7

Member
Apr 18, 2005
429
0
16
Jun 23, 2009
#7
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #7
At the front, the side "frame" rails. At the back, under the center of the differential.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jun 23, 2009
#8
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #8
I always use the crossmember just behind the oil pan.
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Jun 23, 2009
#9
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #9
brianj5600 said:
I always use the crossmember just behind the oil pan.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't do that. That was not intended to be used for lifting the car. Secondly, If the jack slips off then the oil pan will be ruined.

I agree you can use the front strut rod mount just behind the valance.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 23, 2009
#10
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #10
brianj5600 said:
I always use the crossmember just behind the oil pan.
Click to expand...

Oh, I wouldn't recommend that. It's not really built well enough for that, I've thrown away many of them that have been used as jack points. It's really just a fairly thinwall tube.
 

oz

Founding Member
Jun 29, 2000
1,079
10
58
Plymouth, MI
Jun 26, 2009
#11
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #11
brianj5600 said:
I always use the crossmember just behind the oil pan.
Click to expand...

I've always done that too... I had my brace off a couple of years ago to change my oil pan gasket and it was pretty heavy so I assumbed it was fine to jack against. Mine has a few dents in it but no evidence of bending or any other failure from jacking against it.
 

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Jun 27, 2009
#12
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • #12
The original jack was to be placed in the small notch in the seam between the floor and the rocker panel, just behind the front wheel. This is the only place the factory said you could jack that would not cause damage to the car. You see tons of cars with dented frame rails because the rail is too thin and the main weight of the car was designed to be carried by the rocker panel. This is why convetibles have an inner rocker panel from the factory to stregthen the unibody not frame rail connectors
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 27, 2009
#13
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • #13
65FBE2 said:
The original jack was to be placed in the small notch in the seam between the floor and the rocker panel, just behind the front wheel. This is the only place the factory said you could jack that would not cause damage to the car. You see tons of cars with dented frame rails because the rail is too thin and the main weight of the car was designed to be carried by the rocker panel. This is why convertibles have an inner rocker panel from the factory to strengthen the unibody not frame rail connectors
Click to expand...

The notch was for the tire change jack supplied with the car.

The rails get dented by Mongo and Goober slamming the edge of the jack on the rails.

The inner rocker of the convertible compensated for the lack of the coupe/fastback roof. The frame rails and rocker of the convertible were identical to the coupe, except for the addition of the convertible-unique braces. BTW, adding these to coupes is superior to frame rail connectors.

You can see the factory specified the exact location I recommended above for yourself in the Factory Service Manual (pp. 21-2 & 21-3 in the 1966 edition).

At the front under the frame rail where the firewall meets the floor. At the back the rear torque box, where the front of the spring is attached.
Click to expand...
 

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Jun 27, 2009
#14
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • #14
That is correct, but the question was "Did the original jacks lift from the bumper or behind the wheels?" and the answer is behind the wheels, in the little notch with the original jack. The manual states that this is the only safe place to jack the car. The problem with floor jacks on a Mustang is that the jack pad is not flat, but concaved and it puts all the force on the lip of the pad which will dent the thin frame rails. I use a floor jack but always place a flat piece of wood on the pad to evenly distribute the weight. I also agree with your placement

Regaurdless of what many people may think. The main stucture of the car is supported by the rocker panels and not by the subfames. This is how the car was designed and the way Ford engineers wanted it. It is the reason why Ford re-enforced this area of the car in the convertble and did not add subframe connectors. Subframe connectors do help but the main weight of the car is still carried by the rocker panels. As you stated, the best way to re-enforce a coup or fastback is not to add subframe connector but to add convertible inner rockers and box the front to create torque boxes, same as on a convertible. Subframe connector's would have been much cheaper for Ford to add but they do not carrie the same weight as the re-encorced rockers
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 27, 2009
#15
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • #15
65FBE2 said:
That is correct, but the question was "Did the original jacks lift from the bumper or behind the wheels?" and the answer is behind the wheels, in the little notch with the original jack. The manual states that this is the only safe place to jack the car. The problem with floor jacks on a Mustang is that the jack pad is not flat, but concaved and it puts all the force on the lip of the pad which will dent the thin frame rails. I use a floor jack but always place a flat piece of wood on the pad to evenly distribute the weight. I also agree with your placement

Regaurdless of what many people may think. The main stucture of the car is supported by the rocker panels and not by the subfames. This is how the car was designed and the way Ford engineers wanted it. It is the reason why Ford re-enforced this area of the car in the convertble and did not add subframe connectors. Subframe connectors do help but the main weight of the car is still carried by the rocker panels. As you stated, the best way to re-enforce a coup or fastback is not to add subframe connector but to add convertible inner rockers and box the front to create torque boxes, same as on a convertible. Subframe connector's would have been much cheaper for Ford to add but they do not carrie the same weight as the re-encorced rockers
Click to expand...

I use a floor jack with rubber pad, instead of the bare claw. On show cars, a clean shop rag on the pad. Mostly these cars have dents already, but no point making it worse.

The jack point notches are meant for the M shaped jack top, but if you are using stands, floor jack, or a shop lift, you should use the hard points as defined in the Factory Service Manual. I think the manual you were referring to is the owners manual, which tells drivers how to fix a flat.

I disagree about the subframe connectors- The convertible got the subframe connectors from hell, we just call them "inner rockers". They were tied in to the front rails with torque boxes. This worked so well the coupe got the left one in 67, and all Mustangs had them 68-73.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jun 27, 2009
#16
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • #16
dumb question but where do I place a floor jack to lift my front end off the ground? Did the original jacks lift from the bumper or behind the wheels?

These are the 2 questions I saw. The original would be the first of the 2. That is the one I answered.
 

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Jun 28, 2009
#17
  • Jun 28, 2009
  • #17
Dangerously wrong I might add but you did answer the first question.
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Jun 28, 2009
#18
  • Jun 28, 2009
  • #18
65FBE2 said:
Dangerously wrong I might add but you did answer the first question.
Click to expand...

If he is referring to the transmission cross member, then this is the same advice I once got from Global West.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 28, 2009
#19
  • Jun 28, 2009
  • #19
Factory spare tire jack:



Floor jack, floor lift, or stands:

 

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Jun 28, 2009
#20
  • Jun 28, 2009
  • #20
2+2GT hit the nail with the bottom chart. The cross member brianj5600 referred to was the thin round tube just behind the oil pan. You can not jack safely on any round surface! Just because someone gave you bad info dosn't make it right. That small thin cross member may or may not have what it takes to hold up the car but common sense should be enough to end this debate.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Negative Grounds for 2008 4.0L
  • deadbeat
  • May 13, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
0
Views
70
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech May 13, 2026
deadbeat
D
D
Paint and Body Water drops after jacking up the car?
  • dqureshi06
  • Jun 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
354
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2025
Maha89LX
M
Electrical/engine bay harness questions
  • djj62478
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
250
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 6, 2026
djj62478
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
89
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 24, 2026
Mustang5L5
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Tuesday at 3:59 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
150
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 8:05 PM
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?