• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

DYNO--80mm C & L MAF vs. ProM 87mm and the winner is......

  • Thread starter Thread starter TacBear
  • Start date Start date Mar 8, 2004

TacBear

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,243
0
0
Jasper, AL
Mar 8, 2004
#1
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #1
ProM 87 mm MAF

The graph is hard to see so here goes:

Mods are in Sig.
The only change was the MAF!

C & L = 236.3 rwhp and 280.5 rwtq--I never could get my car to Idle right with this on it. It would go back and forth between 550 rpm and 900 rpm at idle every time I would come to a stop.

ProM 87mm MAF = 241.4 rwhp and 289.1 rwtq-- Idles like stock A/F ratio is almost straight from 3000 rpm to 5800. A gain of 5.1 rwhp @ 8.6 rwtq at peak and almost that much from 2200 rpm to 5800 rpm. I think I will stick with the ProM MAF
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Mar 8, 2004
#2
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #2
Did the car run more lean?
Was that dyno run right after the ProM install?
Was there a cool down period?
Did you reset the ECU?

Nick
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Mar 8, 2004
#3
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #3
good test
 

TacBear

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,243
0
0
Jasper, AL
Mar 8, 2004
#4
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #4
mogs01gt said:
Did the car run more lean?
Was that dyno run right after the ProM install?
Was there a cool down period?
Did you reset the ECU?

Nick
Click to expand...

> Look at the Dyno sheet, with the ProM the A/F ratio was almost flat from 3000 (12.6) to 5800 (12.1). The C @ L was all over the place, 3000(14.0)-3500(12.5)-4000(12.1)-5000(11.5)-5500(10.7)

>I changed to the ProM, cooled the engine down and reset the ECU before the 2nd pull!
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Mar 8, 2004
#5
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #5
hmm, I guess my chip corrected mine.
 

Aaron 4.6

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2001
2,695
0
0
Georgia
Mar 8, 2004
#6
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #6
Thanks for the good info. Not much tech on here lately, so threads like this are a breath of fresh air. I rode the C&L bandwagon for a year or more, but I finally came off of some money and went with the Pro-M 95mm setup. No dyno data, but I had the same driveability issues with the C&L. The Pro-M has been like factory stock in comparison.

EDIT-

where are the T/A and pulleys in the sig? With those you'd surely cross the 250 rwhp mark and maybe get close to the 300 rwtq mark.
 

TacBear

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,243
0
0
Jasper, AL
Mar 8, 2004
#7
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #7
Aaron 4.6 said:
Thanks for the good info. Not much tech on here lately, so threads like this are a breath of fresh air. I rode the C&L bandwagon for a year or more, but I finally came off of some money and went with the Pro-M 95mm setup. No dyno data, but I had the same driveability issues with the C&L. The Pro-M has been like factory stock in comparison.

EDIT-

where are the T/A and pulleys in the sig? With those you'd surely cross the 250 rwhp mark and maybe get close to the 300 rwtq mark.
Click to expand...


I am still trying to decide wether to Supercharge or not If I stay N/A I'll have Pullies, T/A, headers,cams, gears, Tune and maybe P & P heads by the end of the year

Hopefully 290+ rwhp and 315+ rwtq
 

TacBear

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,243
0
0
Jasper, AL
Mar 9, 2004
#8
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #8
ttt
 

NasaGT

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,993
2
49
Virginia
Mar 9, 2004
#9
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #9
Thats good stuff. The A/F really is all of the place with the C&L. Sounds like you really do have to have a tune to use the C&L. Thansk for posting that TacBear!
 

TacBear

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,243
0
0
Jasper, AL
Mar 9, 2004
#10
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #10
NasaGT said:
Thats good stuff. The A/F really is all of the place with the C&L. Sounds like you really do have to have a tune to use the C&L. Thansk for posting that TacBear!
Click to expand...

I know of at least 2 others having the same problem with the C @ L
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Mar 9, 2004
#11
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #11
I had the same problem but my headers riched my motor out and the Chip helped a lot.
 

TacBear

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,243
0
0
Jasper, AL
Mar 9, 2004
#12
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #12
mogs01gt said:
I had the same problem but my headers riched my motor out and the Chip helped a lot.
Click to expand...


I need headers!
 

StangLou

Active Member
Jul 9, 2003
1,264
0
36
Holly Springs, NC
Mar 9, 2004
#13
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #13
Get some L/T's . Mine go in on the 23rd. I hear ya TacBear, I dont know if Im going to stay NA or go S/C. Ive got pullies, cai, flows welded in, get my l/t's, mid pipe, and spec stage II put in on the 23rd, then Ill go with a TB/Plenum combo to top it off. Id like to have 290-300rwhp, I guess I will see, there are few believers on here lol. It probably wont happen, but if I can do it then I will be all If I cant then I have one hell of a set up to strap a kenne bell onto after I get forged internals
Back on topic, my one concern is I thought you had to send back the Pro M if you change injectors. Cant you just do a chip with the C&L and compensate for injector size, or can you do this with both? For some reason I was under the impression that the only way you can change the calibration of a Pro M is to send it back to the manufactuor (sp)
 

TacBear

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,243
0
0
Jasper, AL
Mar 9, 2004
#14
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #14
StangLou said:
Get some L/T's . Mine go in on the 23rd. I hear ya TacBear, I dont know if Im going to stay NA or go S/C. Ive got pullies, cai, flows welded in, get my l/t's, mid pipe, and spec stage II put in on the 23rd, then Ill go with a TB/Plenum combo to top it off. Id like to have 290-300rwhp, I guess I will see, there are few believers on here lol. It probably wont happen, but if I can do it then I will be all If I cant then I have one hell of a set up to strap a kenne bell onto after I get forged internals
Back on topic, my one concern is I thought you had to send back the Pro M if you change injectors. Cant you just do a chip with the C&L and compensate for injector size, or can you do this with both? For some reason I was under the impression that the only way you can change the calibration of a Pro M is to send it back to the manufactuor (sp)
Click to expand...


My ProM is calibrated for 19# Injectors and the C and L was supposedly calibrated for 19# Injectors. Luckily I had someone buy the C and L right after I dynoed my car!

P.S.: ProM makes a device that allows you to program your own MAF.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
  • Locked
Expired C&l 80mm Maf System For 1996-2001 4.6l Mustang Cobra & Bullitt
  • BullFrog
  • Mar 17, 2014
  • Engine and Power Adder Parts
Replies
0
Views
1K
Engine and Power Adder Parts Mar 17, 2014
BullFrog
B
C&L new dyno numbers with Bamachips tune and 93...
  • Doug904
  • Nov 20, 2005
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Nov 21, 2005
hamidlmt
Roush Dyno results 2004 S/C Saleen with mods
  • HazeGray
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • Special Production
Replies
12
Views
1K
Special Production Oct 3, 2005
S281SC#08
Added 20hp with C&L combo! Dyno results here
  • stylin99
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
84
Views
10K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 5, 2004
BlackVert
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?