dyno PROOF on k&n filters....... part 2
well here's the "proof" for you guys that were pitching a fit in my other thread. it's all in black in white, done on the same day, under the same circumstances, so believe it or not, here it is
btw -- this was done on a mustang dyno, so pay attention to gains & losses & not the actual numbers. mustang dynos read lower than dynojets, so there is nothing wrong with my car.
please note .......car is in stock form aside from removed silencer
here were the weather conditions.......temperature -- 63 F
barometer -- 30.3 (104)
humidity -- 48%
run #1) WITH k&n -- 208.8 hp @ 5250
244.1 tq @ 4250
run #2) WITH k&n -- 210.7 hp @ 4750
244.1 tq @ 4250
run #3) STOCK -- 215.5 hp @ 4750
246.9 tq @ 4250
run #4) STOCK -- 217.6 hp @ 4750
247.9 tq @ 4250
Here are the averages...... WITH k&N -- 209.75 hp & 244.1 tq
W/O k&n -- 216.5 hp & 247.4 tq
There WAS a LOSS of .......6.6 hp & 3.3 tq
so with all of that out of the way..... if you don't believe it i could care less, it's there in black & white. don't get all pissed at me cause you possibly wasted 55 - 60 bucks just like me. also the reason i sad "possibly" is i will also do a test between the 2 air filters again next week, after my exhaust is installed, to see if the K&N gains power after my exhaust is much less restricted.
so if you don't believe this, i doubt i could convince you the sky is blue
also....... ALL RUNS WERE DONE AT OPERATING TEMPERATURE, THERE WAS NO WARMING UP, or cooling down during the test, i put that in there because i noticed that the power just kept going up
so there you all go....enjoy
well here's the "proof" for you guys that were pitching a fit in my other thread. it's all in black in white, done on the same day, under the same circumstances, so believe it or not, here it is
btw -- this was done on a mustang dyno, so pay attention to gains & losses & not the actual numbers. mustang dynos read lower than dynojets, so there is nothing wrong with my car.
please note .......car is in stock form aside from removed silencer
here were the weather conditions.......temperature -- 63 F
barometer -- 30.3 (104)
humidity -- 48%
run #1) WITH k&n -- 208.8 hp @ 5250
244.1 tq @ 4250
run #2) WITH k&n -- 210.7 hp @ 4750
244.1 tq @ 4250
run #3) STOCK -- 215.5 hp @ 4750
246.9 tq @ 4250
run #4) STOCK -- 217.6 hp @ 4750
247.9 tq @ 4250
Here are the averages...... WITH k&N -- 209.75 hp & 244.1 tq
W/O k&n -- 216.5 hp & 247.4 tq
There WAS a LOSS of .......6.6 hp & 3.3 tq
so with all of that out of the way..... if you don't believe it i could care less, it's there in black & white. don't get all pissed at me cause you possibly wasted 55 - 60 bucks just like me. also the reason i sad "possibly" is i will also do a test between the 2 air filters again next week, after my exhaust is installed, to see if the K&N gains power after my exhaust is much less restricted.
so if you don't believe this, i doubt i could convince you the sky is blue
also....... ALL RUNS WERE DONE AT OPERATING TEMPERATURE, THERE WAS NO WARMING UP, or cooling down during the test, i put that in there because i noticed that the power just kept going up
so there you all go....enjoy