• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

dyno [B]PROOF[/B] on k&n filters....... part 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangman
  • Start date Start date Feb 12, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

vrpirata

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
274
0
0
Southern California
Feb 12, 2004
#21
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #21
WTF, I can't believe that the stock paper filter can flow more air than the K&N, that doesn't make sense
 

StangJonGT

Founding Member
Jun 2, 2001
1,329
0
36
Seattle
Feb 12, 2004
#22
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #22
I am convinced that if he would have run an additional 2 runs at the end with the K&N the numbers would tell a different story. This is a proven mod for every other car on the planet. Maybe the computer had not learned it yet. Maybe the sun and moon were in the wrong alignment...maybe my grandmother wasn't praying...

...I can't believe this...



Jon
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Feb 12, 2004
#23
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #23
hmm
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
Feb 12, 2004
#24
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #24
c2see21 said:
we forgot to plug the mass air back in
Click to expand...
That had the potential to be bad..........
 

98superstangGT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
1,239
0
0
sc
Feb 12, 2004
#25
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #25
was this with just the drop in replacement or a cone type K&N filter? usually the cone flows better then just the drop in from what ive seen. Maybe you should switch to one of those and try it if your not already. Ive also never seen a single dyno that hasnt shown increased hp after the install. Hell my buddy just installed a cone K&N filter in his POS focus and picked up an average of 3-4hp every run.
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Feb 12, 2004
#26
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #26
Does it really matter? If a race comes down to 6HP then you shouldn't be racing...
 

StangJonGT

Founding Member
Jun 2, 2001
1,329
0
36
Seattle
Feb 12, 2004
#27
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #27
Those are the best races merc. Plus, the K&N is a foundation mod; the increased airflow will make future mods perform their best.

Jon
 

madmatt

Ellis Juan sympathizer
Founding Member
Dec 28, 2002
465
0
16
Lexington, SC
Feb 12, 2004
#28
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #28
Ive heard of the silencer taking away horsepower...but the K&N? Man, if this is true then Im pissed. I needed a new filter anyway but man, I coulda bought a 5 dollar one instead. Maybe its just a freak?
 

98superstangGT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
1,239
0
0
sc
Feb 12, 2004
#29
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #29
merc123 said:
Does it really matter? If a race comes down to 6HP then you shouldn't be racing...
Click to expand...

this isnt about a race coming down to 6hp. This is simply about a mod that has been known to work and now might be proved wrong? This is more about trying to get the most hp out of our engines, so if you dont have anything intelligent to say then dont post. Besides, like someone else said. The best races are those that you are neck and neck with the other guy so that 6hp just might matter in the end. Racing is fun no matter how much you win or lose by. end of story.
 
T

TheWaterSkier

New Member
Feb 9, 2004
10
0
0
Lake Worth, FL
Feb 12, 2004
#30
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #30
Just talked with a friend of mine who put a drop in K&N in his 2003 Cobra. Dyno run saw a 6 rwhp drop after installation. Then the shop re-programmed the chip for the new filter. Result, 11 rwhp increase over the stock filter. You must re-program for any induction change (his words, not mine).
 

StangIt #1

Founding Member
Oct 25, 2001
203
0
16
Washing the Car
Feb 12, 2004
#31
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #31
StangJonGT said:
Maybe the computer had not learned it yet
Click to expand...

Charley, this seems like a valid argument. How long did you have the filter in the car before the dyno run? As with any mod, the computer needs a little time to re-learn. I expect that the K&N would make more of a difference with more mods (e.g., exhaust).
 
0

03gtmustang

New Member
May 26, 2003
923
0
0
Northern Va
Feb 12, 2004
#32
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #32
The k&n has definitly been proved to flow better then our stock filters. So Im going to have to go with waterskier and say the chip hasn't learned the mod yet. Wouldn't that be the reason his car is running real rich with the k&n?
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Feb 12, 2004
#33
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #33
i doubt 1 test will throw out many many years of proven results, but c2see21 isn't saying that, he's just posting what results he got. i think he should have done 2 more with the K & N in, and then perhaps with a cone type filter. oh well, still an interesting debate
 
F

fakefvc

Founding Member
Jun 3, 2000
458
0
0
Roswell, New Mexico
Feb 12, 2004
#34
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #34
are you not suppose to disconnect the battery for each mod? That way the computer learns the new mod quickly?
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Feb 12, 2004
#35
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #35
fakefvc said:
are you not suppose to disconnect the battery for each mod? That way the computer learns the new mod quickly?
Click to expand...
i thought it takes like a week of driving for the ECU to relearn though?
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Feb 12, 2004
#36
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #36
i was under the impression that you just had to disconnect the computer and get all the electricity out of the computer by tapping the brakes a few times, and then it would re-set the system and once you reconnected the batter and started it up, it would make the adjustments based on the new data it would be receiving.
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Feb 12, 2004
#37
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #37
I still don't think you can accurately prove that it improves HP because you have to drive the car a few days for the computer to relearn which would mean conditions weren't the same and the dyno numbers wouldn't be perfectly scienctific and accurate and this is a really long run on sentence if I've ever seen or heard of one in this current lifetime.
 
R

RedGTvert

Founding Member
Nov 21, 1999
3,129
1
58
Wellington, FL
Feb 12, 2004
#38
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #38
Gotta love this thread.

You have one guy coming on here saying you need to reprogram your computer or chip for this mod. I say to you . . BUNK

You have another guy saying you should clean it and re-appling the K&N juice. It is a brand new filter, right out of a brand new box, right off the shelf, why should it need to be cleaned and oiled to perform as advertised

I particularly like the one from the person who says if you are worried about 6 rwhp, you shouldn't be racing. No offense, but that is one ignorant statement. Do you want to tell the to a true racer and not a bench racer? Every bit of HP matters!!!!

Look, we have all bought into the hype of the K & N, probably because it is a cheap mod that everyone recommends, but maybe nobody ever wanted to spend the money to test such a lowly item as this gentleman has.

All these poepl who say it is a proven mod, how do we know it is proven, by word of mouth? Well I see another conspiracy theory beginning with this thread.
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Feb 12, 2004
#39
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #39
i always told people to get the K & N because i wanted them to waste their money.
 

fine99

New Member
Aug 11, 2003
66
0
0
Saskatchewan
Feb 12, 2004
#40
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #40
Since installing a K & N filter on my '99 GT I have noticed that it does not run as smooth as it once used to. I talked to Ford and they suggested a computer re-flash. To the guy that started this, I beleive you did this in good faith, given the way my car was running when I put her away I think somethin is up with the K &n since this is the only mod I've done to my car...It was much harder to start and took longer to warm-up. When the snow melts here, I am going to take it in and get the re-flash. Has anyone else had the same problem with a relatively stock car if, so how did you fix it?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Kandi: she's cheap, fun, & has a loose top - sold!
  • FastDriver
  • Apr 20, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
112
Views
20K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 27, 2019
2000xp8
8
Shocked by Dyno Results - 1990 Mark VII with 5.0 HO
  • 88Mark7
  • Mar 12, 2018
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
7K
Other Auto Tech Oct 6, 2018
I Bleed Ford Blue
K
Are The 19lb's Good Or Should I Go Next Size (24)
  • kendawg73
  • Jan 8, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 12, 2018
FoxMustangLvr
N
SOLD Supercharged 1989 SSP Coupe $13,500 obo
  • notchlubber
  • Jul 17, 2018
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
13K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 28, 2020
notchlubber
N
Some Questions To Help Me Complete My Lise: Headers, Distributor, Roller Rockers, Clutch, Ect.
  • from6to8
  • Feb 17, 2016
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
932
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 17, 2016
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?