• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

dyno [B]PROOF[/B] on k&n filters....... part 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangman
  • Start date Start date Feb 12, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

lopey4.6

20+ Year Stangneter
Jan 4, 2004
309
0
16
49
Westlake,OH
Feb 12, 2004
#41
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #41
I got mine so I could put the stickers on my car.
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
43
San Diego
Feb 12, 2004
#42
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #42
the stickers add more hp/tq than the actual filter.
 

Ruckus46Gt

Member
Nov 26, 2003
385
0
16
42
Long Island
Feb 12, 2004
#43
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #43
ok ready....maybe you have some freak car that doesnt respond to a dyno. If what you are saying is true then the people at k&n, pro 5.0 mag, muscle mustangs and every other person who has done research on the gains were wrong. It must have been some godly given hp after the switch happened and they dynoed it. These new cars have computers. They need to adjust to some things and changing your air filter requires the computer to adjust because you are sending more air in. When you did your dyno's did you think about check if your car was running um lets say lean or rich or anything? It probely didnt adjust to the filter and then you took it out after a short while and put the stock in which it was used to so the numbers look better
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Feb 12, 2004
#44
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #44
well i have so many things to respond to i don't know where to start

shane (stangit#1) & the other guys that are trying to say that the computer needed to relearn the mod. i had the k&n in there for about 2 weeks & i'm sure that the computer has learned it. also, the first two runs were made with the k&n in, so i would think that the car would not put out as good of numbers with the stock paper filter. correct me if i'm wrong here, but that is what makes sense to me.

also, don't forget guys....i'm going to do the same test on monday or wednesday, when i get my longtubes & prochamber installed. the k&n might make a difference with a more free flowing exhaust side we'll see then. so i'm not saying that everyone should start writing letters or rip theirs out.....yet , i'm just trying to be as exact in this as possible & account for every little thing & provide completely accurate results for you guys to decifer & pass your own judgement on but i'll tell you all right now, if it gives me the same result next week k&n is prolly getting a letter or email with dyno results in it
 

Ruckus46Gt

Member
Nov 26, 2003
385
0
16
42
Long Island
Feb 12, 2004
#45
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #45
anyone else see that the story keeps on changing?
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Feb 12, 2004
#46
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #46
Ruckus46Gt said:
ok ready....maybe you have some freak car that doesnt respond to a dyno. If what you are saying is true then the people at k&n, pro 5.0 mag, muscle mustangs and every other person who has done research on the gains were wrong. It must have been some godly given hp after the switch happened and they dynoed it. These new cars have computers. They need to adjust to some things and changing your air filter requires the computer to adjust because you are sending more air in. When you did your dyno's did you think about check if your car was running um lets say lean or rich or anything? It probely didnt adjust to the filter and then you took it out after a short while and put the stock in which it was used to so the numbers look better
Click to expand...


ok..... well..... lets look at what you just said. if the computer can't learn the mod (at least somewhat) whenever i do it on the dyno. then, by what you just said, there would never be any "accurate" dyno's done EVER. because you would have to dyno the car, let the car learn the mod, then re-dyno it, which would prolly call for the re-dyno to be on a different day. so then you could make the arguement about the weather conditions not being the same. so just take this little test for what it's worth.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Feb 12, 2004
#47
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #47
Ruckus46Gt said:
anyone else see that the story keeps on changing?
Click to expand...

ok....please enlighten me on how it keeps on changing the numbers are there in back & white, you can believe it or not. it makes no difference to me. so just go back & bury your head in the ground & not listen to anything & believe the earth is flat

i'm not saying this is a complete exhaustive test, cause there is always going to be something i could miss. but a 6.6 rwhp difference is hard to miss regardless
 

NasaGT

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,993
2
49
Virginia
Feb 12, 2004
#48
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #48
Well, if you are going to dyno again, how about starting with stock filter and then switching to K&N?
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Feb 12, 2004
#49
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #49
NasaGT said:
Well, if you are going to dyno again, how about starting with stock filter and then switching to K&N?
Click to expand...

done that's actually what i planned on doing. i didn't bother to re-install the k&n since it lost hp, pretty handily. so i will do it in that order next week
 

forpit2000gt

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
2,490
0
0
58
Columbia, SC
Feb 12, 2004
#50
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #50
I have seen a care make no changes and make three pulls that were + and -5 hp of the baseline pull. Same day , same car , no changes, all within 45 minutes. Why did this happen???
K&N filters ahve proven to flow better than stock and that is good enough for me. Are you saying easier flow will cut HP? maybe I should stick a sock in the TB to give me more tq and HP.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Feb 12, 2004
#51
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #51
forpit2000gt said:
I have seen a care make no changes and make three pulls that were + and -5 hp of the baseline pull. Same day , same car , no changes, all within 45 minutes. Why did this happen???
K&N filters ahve proven to flow better than stock and that is good enough for me. Are you saying easier flow will cut HP? maybe I should stick a sock in the TB to give me more tq and HP.
Click to expand...

just make sure to give us some dyno results from it
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
coldgravity.com
Feb 12, 2004
#52
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #52
i want to be able to make lots of dyno pulls
 

03-s281

New Member
Jan 20, 2004
421
0
0
Stangville,TN
Feb 12, 2004
#53
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #53
FU**-IT,
I'm putting a tornado on mine.
 
0

02GT03SVT

New Member
Oct 22, 2003
45
0
0
Feb 12, 2004
#54
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #54
Man, it's no secret that there are power losses on a stock length intake. Just removing the silencer, or even removing the whole filter cover will result in a loss. You have to add length to the intake. That means you have to buy an intake and put your filter in the fenderwell. Go buy an intake and do the same tests, and those results will be different.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Feb 12, 2004
#55
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #55
02GT03SVT said:
Man, it's no secret that there are power losses on a stock length intake. Just removing the silencer, or even removing the whole filter cover will result in a loss. You have to add length to the intake. That means you have to buy an intake and put your filter in the fenderwell. Go buy an intake and do the same tests, and those results will be different.
Click to expand...



o...k.... but if you put the filter in the fenderwell with a intake & a 90 degree bend like most, then it makes you run on the rich side. not that this has anything to do with what we are talking about, or am i missing something
 

ttown

Founding Member
May 30, 2002
815
0
0
Oklahoma
Feb 12, 2004
#56
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #56
02GT03SVT said:
Man, it's no secret that there are power losses on a stock length intake. Just removing the silencer, or even removing the whole filter cover will result in a loss. You have to add length to the intake. That means you have to buy an intake and put your filter in the fenderwell. Go buy an intake and do the same tests, and those results will be different.
Click to expand...

Well there's a lot of urban legend out there, does it help? maybe. Look at the dyno on my Mach it's got the snorkel removed and it was a couple HP less with it in. An opinion or a dyno you make the choice............... A lot depends on your A/F.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
coldgravity.com
Feb 12, 2004
#57
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #57
02GT03SVT said:
Man, it's no secret that there are power losses on a stock length intake. Just removing the silencer, or even removing the whole filter cover will result in a loss. You have to add length to the intake. That means you have to buy an intake and put your filter in the fenderwell. Go buy an intake and do the same tests, and those results will be different.
Click to expand...
where did u hear this
 

StangJonGT

Founding Member
Jun 2, 2001
1,329
0
36
44
Seattle
Feb 12, 2004
#58
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #58
Does it really matter anyway? I was under the impression that the computer does not run off of sensor input during WOT anyway. I was just throwing that statment out there as a joke.


Jon
 
E

edwardohaskillo

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
120
0
0
The Land of Milk and Honey
Feb 13, 2004
#59
  • Feb 13, 2004
  • #59
I'm telling ya...TAKE THE PLASTIC WRAPPER OFF the new filter before you install it!
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
45
Ohio
Feb 13, 2004
#60
  • Feb 13, 2004
  • #60
RedGTvert said:
Gotta love this thread.



You have another guy saying you should clean it and re-appling the K&N juice. It is a brand new filter, right out of a brand new box, right off the shelf, why should it need to be cleaned and oiled to perform as advertised



.
Click to expand...


I said that just to try and see what happens you freaking cry baby.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Kandi: she's cheap, fun, & has a loose top - sold!
  • FastDriver
  • Apr 20, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
112
Views
20K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 27, 2019
2000xp8
8
Shocked by Dyno Results - 1990 Mark VII with 5.0 HO
  • 88Mark7
  • Mar 12, 2018
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
7K
Other Auto Tech Oct 6, 2018
I Bleed Ford Blue
K
Are The 19lb's Good Or Should I Go Next Size (24)
  • kendawg73
  • Jan 8, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 12, 2018
FoxMustangLvr
N
SOLD Supercharged 1989 SSP Coupe $13,500 obo
  • notchlubber
  • Jul 17, 2018
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
13K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 28, 2020
notchlubber
N
Some Questions To Help Me Complete My Lise: Headers, Distributor, Roller Rockers, Clutch, Ect.
  • from6to8
  • Feb 17, 2016
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
932
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 17, 2016
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?