• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Dyno Differences Between 4.10, 3.73, and 3.27?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BCE03
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
B

BCE03

New Member
Apr 5, 2006
10
0
0
Apr 11, 2006
#1
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #1
Has anyone taken a completely stock 2V with stock 3.27 and dynoed it against another stock 2V with 3.73 or 4.10? I've heard you actually lose a few horsepower at the wheels when you switch from 3.27 to a lower ratio like 3.73 or 4.10.

My friend's '01 feels slower with his 4.10s than it did with the stock 3.27, so I can't really go by seat of the pants.
 

goshia

New Member
Jul 1, 2005
252
0
0
Mead, Colorado
Apr 11, 2006
#2
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #2
In theory 0 HP gain, but I'm testing away to get up to 10HP gain. It still is going to help with quicker times off the line.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Apr 11, 2006
#3
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #3
The number of teeth.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Apr 12, 2006
#4
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #4
BCE03 said:
Has anyone taken a completely stock 2V with stock 3.27 and dynoed it against another stock 2V with 3.73 or 4.10? I've heard you actually lose a few horsepower at the wheels when you switch from 3.27 to a lower ratio like 3.73 or 4.10.

My friend's '01 feels slower with his 4.10s than it did with the stock 3.27, so I can't really go by seat of the pants.
Click to expand...


every car I ever drove with 4.10's or 3.73's feels faster than a 3.27 car with the same mods.

But yes with 4.10's your drivetrain will be slightly less efficent. but your car will run faster with traction, it's been proven by all the big names in modular racing.
 
B

BCE03

New Member
Apr 5, 2006
10
0
0
Apr 12, 2006
#5
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #5
What about trap speeds? Are they giving up 1 or 2 MPH at the finish line for a slight gain in ET?
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Apr 12, 2006
#6
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #6
there is "0" hp gain. any change on the dyno would just be mechanical advantage of one gear over another.

define feels slower. I mean you have to notice first gear is alot shorter. second should pull alot harder.

now I will addmit a gear change is not like adding 100hp but I don't know how you would not think the car is quicker. I mean I only have 3.73's and if I am not carful I am all over the rev limiter in first in a hurry. with 4.10's it is even quicker.

the whole theory behind a gear changer is to get the car in its powerband in all gears quicker. in the 1320 you want to be fairly close to redline in 1:1 gear. so you would gear your car according to trap speed basically.

the only way 4.10's would make your car physically slower is if you left a bunch of rubber at the starting line and your 60' was horrible. other than that it is going to be quicker bottom line.
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Apr 12, 2006
#7
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #7
in theory tq should be slightly higher from gear reduction...
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Apr 12, 2006
#8
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #8
RoadconeTuning said:
in theory tq should be slightly higher from gear reduction...
Click to expand...

Not in theory, torque IS higher with a gear reduction. That's what gears do. One thing to remember though, is that the torque you see on a dyno is calulated by measuring the torque measured at the wheels then deviding it by the final drive ratio.
 

dustang50

Member
Jan 12, 2006
132
0
16
Cleveland, OH
Apr 12, 2006
#9
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #9
I don't need a dyno to tell me that 4.10s are the way to go. You'll agree when you get on the throttle...
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Apr 12, 2006
#10
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #10
this isn't another "are 4.10's worth it" thread is it?

i know this isn't one of those. or i'm gonna have to kill someone.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 12, 2006
#11
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #11
Actually I think it may be a " do 4.10's effect dyno numbers thread" as in will my dyno read different with a change to 4.10's?
 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member
Jan 18, 2004
1,841
7
38
New Jersey
Apr 12, 2006
#12
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #12
billfisher said:
this isn't another "are 4.10's worth it" thread is it?

i know this isn't one of those. or i'm gonna have to kill someone.
Click to expand...

 
T

turbomaxx

New Member
Jul 13, 2008
22
0
0
Strasburg, VA (NOVA, 540 crew)
Jan 8, 2009
#13
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #13
So when I install my FRPP 3.73 will it be a noticable difference? I always thought it would but people are trying to tell me it won't make much difference. I don't see how it couldn't???
 

NitroDuck

I put out on the 1st date
Founding Member
Aug 17, 1999
4,406
0
66
Baltimore, MD
Jan 8, 2009
#14
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #14
turbomaxx said:
So when I install my FRPP 3.73 will it be a noticable difference? I always thought it would but people are trying to tell me it won't make much difference. I don't see how it couldn't???
Click to expand...

Unless you suffer from NBD (Numb Butt Disorder), you'll notice the difference.
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Jan 8, 2009
#15
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #15
turbomaxx said:
So when I install my FRPP 3.73 will it be a noticable difference? I always thought it would but people are trying to tell me it won't make much difference. I don't see how it couldn't???
Click to expand...

You'll notice a difference. Whoever doesn't needs to turn in their keys.
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,264
363
164
Joplin, Missouri
Jan 8, 2009
#16
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #16
No power gains but I know going from 3.27's to 4.30's I almost chit myself the first time. Was a HUGE improvement..... First became non existent w/o tires but still fun. Always nice to pull a hill at 45 in 5th..
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jan 8, 2009
#17
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #17
As others said, you will likely make LESS power on the dyno with higher gear ratios (3.73, 4.10, ect). There are 2 effects happening on the dyno.

The first, is that higher gear ratios absorb slightly more power. The teeth are angled slightly more to get the same contact patch on the gears and they just absorb a bit more power.

The other effect is the load on the engine. Higher gear ratios put slightly less load on the engine than lower gears. Similar effect to dynoing in 3rd instead of 4th.
 

02nightmaregt

To hell with your Mustang, I want to see your HOG!
Jul 1, 2007
513
4
19
Southern Indiana
Jan 8, 2009
#18
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #18
turbomaxx said:
So when I install my FRPP 3.73 will it be a noticable difference? I always thought it would but people are trying to tell me it won't make much difference. I don't see how it couldn't???
Click to expand...

Slap them in the face I noticed a huge difference.
OP: I don't know what you mean by "slower?" but its definately NOT slower.
 
T

turbomaxx

New Member
Jul 13, 2008
22
0
0
Strasburg, VA (NOVA, 540 crew)
Jan 8, 2009
#19
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #19
02nightmaregt said:
Slap them in the face I noticed a huge difference.
OP: I don't know what you mean by "slower?" but its definately NOT slower.
Click to expand...

Thank god! I was worried I was wasting money!
 

02nightmaregt

To hell with your Mustang, I want to see your HOG!
Jul 1, 2007
513
4
19
Southern Indiana
Jan 8, 2009
#20
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #20
The HP won't change, but TQ will.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

AOD Shifter adjustment
  • Trogdor
  • Jun 4, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 10, 2023
alutwon
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sunday at 3:20 PM
GearHeadGuy
D
Difference between 3.73 and 4.10 gears on v6?
  • Dunmaghlas
  • Jun 18, 2019
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
1K
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 18, 2019
Dunmaghlas
D
V
A 20 year old car, with many faults!
  • Virus101
  • May 4, 2020
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 9, 2020
Cobra262
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?