• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Dyno #'s are in.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MattZ281LE
  • Start date Start date Nov 1, 2003

MattZ281LE

Founding Member
Feb 6, 2000
345
1
19
Purcellville, Va
Nov 1, 2003
#1
  • Nov 1, 2003
  • #1
Dyno #s where pretty good. With no tuning or chip the first pull was 302Hp/327Tq But running somewhat lean. Finally ended up with a max of 306.5Hp/329.4Tq (std) 298.5/320.9 (sae) Stock 120k short short block and off the shelf cam With H/C/I I picked up 92hp 52tq. Mods are in sig.

My idle is fine now, took around 200-300 miles to learn, no stalling or bucking. I can cruise along at 1500 rpm with no problems. Awesome driveability I can drive spirited and still stay under 3k, lots and lots of torque. I hit the timing dead on when I put the motor back together and all that was adjusted was the fuel pressure. Im pretty happy with the results. At this point I dont think I will chip the car. Doesn't seem to need it. All pulls where over 300 std. or 295 sae. This is the exact level of my LS1 when it was stock.


Stock Dyno


First Pull (no tuning)


Final Pull


On the Dyno
http://hometown.aol.com/mattz281le/images/dynoback.jpg
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Nov 1, 2003
#2
  • Nov 1, 2003
  • #2
Cool in N/A form I dynoed at 292 HP / 312 TQ and we have the same cam. Those are awesome numbers, congrats.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 2, 2003
#3
  • Nov 2, 2003
  • #3
Nice numbers!!!
 
S

sukkoi19

New Member
Jan 17, 2003
202
0
0
Moline IL
Nov 2, 2003
#4
  • Nov 2, 2003
  • #4
Nice numbers, they might dyno the same, but Im sure the LS1 wouldnt have a chance.
 

slo95.0

New Member
Oct 24, 2003
108
0
0
fort worth texas
Nov 2, 2003
#5
  • Nov 2, 2003
  • #5
i would say i hate you, but i think loathe is a better word,


congrats on the #'s jealousy isnt the word,
i do have a Q though, how does is feel to spend all that money and only equal the ls1's stock power? just curious.
 

91LX_5L

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
1,943
0
36
British Columbia
Nov 2, 2003
#6
  • Nov 2, 2003
  • #6
What type of heads do you have AFR?
 

MattZ281LE

Founding Member
Feb 6, 2000
345
1
19
Purcellville, Va
Nov 2, 2003
#7
  • Nov 2, 2003
  • #7
i do have a Q though, how does is feel to spend all that money and only equal the ls1's stock power? just curious.
Click to expand...

Feels just fine. I think of the Camaro as a distance runner, a better highway car The Mustang is more like a sprinter, quick off the line and good in much shorter distances. Its louder and more agressive looking. The Camaro is best out on the long open roads for real speed runs and distance driving. I find the both a blast to drive. American cars are my favorite and both are old school pushrods :worship:

What type of heads do you have AFR?
Click to expand...

AFR 165 Pedastal mount 60cc. I would HIGHLY recomment the stud mount heads for ease of valve train alignment. Its worth the extra money of inital setup to have them.
 
S

SPRCHRGD

New Member
Feb 16, 2003
37
0
0
Nov 2, 2003
#8
  • Nov 2, 2003
  • #8
Nice numbers - I like the look of that torque curve nice and flat. Amazing how is compares to the stock torque curve where it falls off like a cliff 3700RPM!!
 

onebad95

Sherriff of Bling King County
Jul 22, 2002
1,237
0
37
At the end of the track waiting for you !!
Nov 2, 2003
#9
  • Nov 2, 2003
  • #9
Looks good, now go get some tires and get yourself into the 12's... You'll be there no problem..
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Nov 2, 2003
#10
  • Nov 2, 2003
  • #10
Ya Baby....Nice power...
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Nov 4, 2003
#11
  • Nov 4, 2003
  • #11
Very nice numbers for that relatively "mild" cam. Glad to hear the torque was good down low- very important for street driveability.
 

HoofnIt

Founding Member
Jan 8, 2001
1,175
0
36
North Carolina
Nov 28, 2003
#12
  • Nov 28, 2003
  • #12
Matt-Is the Crower cam you installed emissions legal?
 

MattZ281LE

Founding Member
Feb 6, 2000
345
1
19
Purcellville, Va
Nov 29, 2003
#13
  • Nov 29, 2003
  • #13
Yes the Crower 15511 is emissions legal, I dont have the CARB # but it is milder than the E Cam.
My car is a California car that is no longer in Cali, but I am in a Virginia County that requires thr rolling IM240 emissions test.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 29, 2003
#14
  • Nov 29, 2003
  • #14
Matt

Congrats & Nice Pull

Very good looking torque curve

I like that cam!!!

It was on my short list but decided to go with Ed@ FTI.

That torque is gonna be fun on the street!

Later
Grady
 

Eric94GTvert

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
596
1
16
PA, Nazareth
Nov 29, 2003
#15
  • Nov 29, 2003
  • #15
After seeing that graph, I think I just found my future combo. Nice #'s!
 

HoofnIt

Founding Member
Jan 8, 2001
1,175
0
36
North Carolina
Nov 29, 2003
#16
  • Nov 29, 2003
  • #16
I'm assuming the 'Cobra RR's' are the 1.72? What size of combustion chamber did you get w/ the AFR's? Are they stud or pedestal mount? Thanks, I plan on doing the swap this coming spring.
 

FastGT94

Member
Nov 20, 2003
300
0
16
NW Burbs, IL
Dec 9, 2003
#17
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #17
Would the E-303 have more power since it isn't as "mild"? How is the idle on the Crower? Nice and loppey or smooth? I guess I'm asking if the car actually sounds cammed out or not?

Thanks!
-Dale
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
225
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
735
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Engine Information that is Needed When You Post a "Car is not Running" or "Car is Running Poorly" Thread
  • AeroCoupe
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 4, 2025
Bullitt347
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
679
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
M
Engine Intermittent CEL with loss of power
  • Mikebro
  • Sep 7, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 13, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?