• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Dyno tuner advised me to ditch the PRO-M

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcam347
  • Start date Start date Sep 10, 2011

bcam347

Member
Feb 27, 2011
76
6
8
Sep 10, 2011
#1
  • Sep 10, 2011
  • #1
his words "Ford MAF meters are always recommended for any application. Since the advent of devices that can manipulate the MAF signal, and then making the necessary PCM calibrations changes, you can support 800+ rwhp. C&L or Pro-M MAF’s are always a second choice, as they usually produce an inconsistent / improper signal. "

Suggested I buy a 80mm lightning unit. anyone agree?

tuning a 347 with aluminum heads, 30lbs injectors, 75mm pro-m thats running great right now
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 10, 2011
#2
  • Sep 10, 2011
  • #2
bcam347 said:
his words "Ford MAF meters are always recommended for any application. Since the advent of devices that can manipulate the MAF signal, and then making the necessary PCM calibrations changes, you can support 800+ rwhp. C&L or Pro-M MAF’s are always a second choice, as they usually produce an inconsistent / improper signal. "

Suggested I buy a 80mm lightning unit. anyone agree?

tuning a 347 with aluminum heads, 30lbs injectors, 75mm pro-m thats running great right now
Click to expand...

If it's running great, then leave it alone. If you make changes in the future and the Pro-M turns out to be a problem then, replace it.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Sep 16, 2011
#3
  • Sep 16, 2011
  • #3
Run from this guy, he's trying to sell you a chip. C&L seriously? The worst meter available. If this was a 96 or newer I could buy into the lightning meter, but not on a fox.

If anything you could probably use a larger meter, look for a 95mm velocity.

And for the record, ford meters are usually pegged around 450rwhp, far from 800.

Honestly, this guy has no clue, probably hasn't been in business for long enough to be working on a fox, guys from the 96 and newer era should not work on foxbody's.
 
W

wizwrath

Member
Oct 2, 2007
34
0
6
Sep 25, 2011
#4
  • Sep 25, 2011
  • #4
Just my .02, back in the day, the Pro-M was the best meters out there, C&L then came out with their interchangable tubes, etc. I never had problems with Pro-M, their drivability and making the horsepower was the best, there wasnt anything else that could have done it. Keep in mind we were running single digit 1/4 mile times, and drove them on the street all over the place. We did have to send them back in for recalibration when we changed injectors, etc. Nowadays, there is alot of other quality meters out there (I heard the ABACO was a great meter), but didnt try them yet. And I will continue to run the Pro-M too.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Sep 25, 2011
#5
  • Sep 25, 2011
  • #5
2000xp8 said:
Run from this guy, he's trying to sell you a chip.
Click to expand...
I thought the point was that the OP was getting a dyno tune?


There is nothing wrong with a ProM meter, unless it's too small.
If buying a new lightning MAF, I would just go with the 90mm LMAF


But I haven't seen any justification for changing the MAF in your post.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Sep 25, 2011
#6
  • Sep 25, 2011
  • #6
I agree with the tuner if I didn't already have the PRo-M

I'd rather use a Ford meter with a tune, over an aftermarket meter "calibrated" for injector size...ESP if I'm getting the tune anyway. I prob would have bought an 80mm lightning MAF, showed up, swapped it out and then dyno tuned and them sold off the pro-m
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Sep 25, 2011
#7
  • Sep 25, 2011
  • #7
Asking someone to change their MAF that doesn't cause any problems when you're already tuning is just a tuner being lazy. Tell them that's what you have, and unless they're willing to swap in a LMAF for nothing, then keep the Pro-M and let them tune it.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,086
2,689
224
Vass, NC
Sep 25, 2011
#8
  • Sep 25, 2011
  • #8
I also agree with some of the tuner's statements regarding the Ford MAFs, and yes you can make 800rwhp by manipulating the EEC, apparently. Don't fix what ain't broke, though. Your Pro-M is working fine. There is nothing wrong with their meters, and so far as I can tell, they're as reliable as factory.

Chris
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Sep 27, 2011
#9
  • Sep 27, 2011
  • #9
Personally Id take a Prom_m meter any day, they actually do some of the work and development with FORD Motor Company. I tend to have issues with the Lightning Meters and overrun them easily on anything over 500hp.

I use the Pro-M 75mm, 80mm, 92mm and blowthrough protubes very often with no issues....
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Sep 28, 2011
#10
  • Sep 28, 2011
  • #10
Find a tuner that will use the current Pro-M that's on the car
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

can I swap in a c&l mass air to replace my bad Pro-m meter & use the same chip?
  • 393strokervert
  • Aug 20, 2011
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 25, 2011
393strokervert
Pro-M Mass air meter question!
  • 1987stangman
  • Jul 31, 2010
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
622
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 1, 2010
HISSIN50
E
  • Locked
1995 Saleen S351-R #76
  • eddie33
  • Nov 17, 2010
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
2
Views
18K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Nov 28, 2010
BlownFiveLiter
L
Cam, Maf and intake question
  • LXFIVEOYEAH
  • Oct 16, 2008
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
660
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2008
vristang
Pro m Questions
  • Dagz
  • Mar 31, 2009
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
452
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 31, 2009
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?