• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Dyno'd today.. #'s inside

  • Thread starter Thread starter sgarlic
  • Start date Start date Mar 25, 2006

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Mar 25, 2006
#1
  • Mar 25, 2006
  • #1
So, our local group here in Tucson had a dyno day today.. along with a mystic cobra that layed down 428, and a few other random ponies, mine put down 233rwhp and 273tq. The first 2 runs were 228hp, then 232, then the last was the best one. My only applicable mods are K&N drop in, removed silencer, mac o/r h, and flowmaster catback.

Some things to factor in I guess (whether or not they matter) .. is I have 3.73's which they said didn't matter on the dyno, it was 83*, barometer @ 29.96 humidity 8%. I'm not sure if our elevation here makes a difference.. it was on a dynojet, SAE (don't know about corrected or not.) If it's uncorrected, a calculator online gave me 254rwhp and 298tq after corrections. No A/F graph.

Seems a tad on the low side, especially considering a stock '01 with dumps and underdrives put down 239 right before me. Maybe that midpipe is hurting me.

Thoughts?

Edit: Movie here: http://media.putfile.com/Andy-dyno
 

Attachments

  • lastscan.webp
    12 KB · Views: 197

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Mar 25, 2006
#2
  • Mar 25, 2006
  • #2
A/F is really going to tell how the engine is.
 
S

stng

New Member
Jul 27, 2005
182
0
0
Mar 25, 2006
#3
  • Mar 25, 2006
  • #3
Well I think those are pretty respectable numbers with your mods, maybe a bit low...
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Mar 25, 2006
#4
  • Mar 25, 2006
  • #4
stng said:
Well I think those are pretty respectable numbers with your mods, maybe a bit low...
Click to expand...

Agreed. Dyno numbers are tough. There's a lot of false info out there so it kind of gets your hopes up as to the power you are really making. I wish company's that advertised dyno numbers should graphs and mods to back up there BS. Your's do seem a little on the low side. Still good though .
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 25, 2006
#5
  • Mar 25, 2006
  • #5
Hahaha....Hey Andy, did you bring all of your friends and family out to watch? There's quite a crowd in there.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Mar 25, 2006
#6
  • Mar 25, 2006
  • #6
Gearbanger 101 said:
Hahaha....Hey Andy, did you bring all of your friends and family out to watch? There's quite a crowd in there.
Click to expand...

Heh.. no.. it was a dyno day where a bunch of guys from our local group were there.
 

Built98GT

New Member
Oct 17, 2005
211
0
0
OKC
Mar 25, 2006
#7
  • Mar 25, 2006
  • #7
How do you figure your midpipe is hurting you?
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Mar 25, 2006
#8
  • Mar 25, 2006
  • #8
Well, I've never heard of anyone complaining of a loss of SOTP from a catback, or dropin filter, so that only leaves my midpipe.. there was a seemingly noticeable power loss after I installed it.. it was mostly just a thought.. not a very serious one.
 
N

nightstalker729

New Member
Jul 19, 2005
3
0
0
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mar 25, 2006
#9
  • Mar 25, 2006
  • #9
I used to work for DynoJet assembling the very dyno you ran on, and in my tuning experience, I would say that although your numbers are a little low, I think they are accurate. If the dyno was run SAE the correction factor is automatically done on our dynos. How many miles are on your car? High mileage will cause significant powerloss on the stock engines. I agree with the other guys on your a/f curve. If you dial that in, you will see some more hp and trq.

My stang had 300 miles when I first dyno'd it and it put down 234 hp @ 4800. After 1000 miles, we dyno'd again with BBK long-tubes, o/r x-pipe, and a MagnaFlow MagnaPac catback producing 250 hp at 5200 rpm with huge hp and trq gains across the board. The stock a/f was in the low 12's and high 11's stock. With the exhaust mods, the curve ran between 12.6 and 13.5 with no tuning.

I expect that your mods with miles are accurate.
 
N

nightstalker729

New Member
Jul 19, 2005
3
0
0
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mar 25, 2006
#10
  • Mar 25, 2006
  • #10
I just checked out your Dyno Sheet on your website, and it is corrected for SAE. That will be altitude, barometer, temperature, and humidity.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Mar 26, 2006
#11
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #11
nightstalker729 said:
I used to work for DynoJet assembling the very dyno you ran on, and in my tuning experience, I would say that although your numbers are a little low, I think they are accurate. If the dyno was run SAE the correction factor is automatically done on our dynos. How many miles are on your car? High mileage will cause significant powerloss on the stock engines. I agree with the other guys on your a/f curve. If you dial that in, you will see some more hp and trq.

My stang had 300 miles when I first dyno'd it and it put down 234 hp @ 4800. After 1000 miles, we dyno'd again with BBK long-tubes, o/r x-pipe, and a MagnaFlow MagnaPac catback producing 250 hp at 5200 rpm with huge hp and trq gains across the board. The stock a/f was in the low 12's and high 11's stock. With the exhaust mods, the curve ran between 12.6 and 13.5 with no tuning.

I expect that your mods with miles are accurate.
Click to expand...

Welp, there are just over 8,600 miles on the car.. good to know the numbers are already corrected.. thanks for the info!
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Mar 26, 2006
#12
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #12
Gearbanger 101 said:
Hahaha....Hey Andy, did you bring all of your friends and family out to watch? There's quite a crowd in there.
Click to expand...

National Lampoon's Dyno Day

nice numbers though. I doubt the midpipe is making you lose power, if anything it's just shifting the powerband to higher RPMs. Don't sweat it
 

poorcollegekid

Member
Mar 31, 2005
74
0
6
Mount Carmel, IL
Mar 26, 2006
#13
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #13
to get a little more power, not a lot, get rid of the flows and get borla or magnapacks.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Mar 26, 2006
#14
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #14
Thanks for the input.. I don't much care for the sound of Borla.. and magnapacks are just too damned cackly for me.
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Mar 26, 2006
#15
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #15
I used to have the same exhaust setup as you sgarlic - if not for emissions, I would still have it because I absolutely loved it. I doubt the Flows are making you lose any power. Like I said, all your power is probably in the higher RPMs because of the midpipe
 

loosescrew79

New Member
Dec 18, 2004
313
0
0
Mar 26, 2006
#16
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #16
your #s are not that bad. I put down the same with a cat back and CIA.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Mar 26, 2006
#17
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #17
Thanks again for the input fellas. Think I'll pick up an xcal2 in a little while here and see what I can come up with.
 

ocbaud

Member
May 7, 2005
239
1
18
Midwest City, Oklahoma
Mar 26, 2006
#18
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #18
i put down 240hp & 282ft/lbs with the mods in my sig.
another guy with about the same as me + a predator put down 252hp & 298ft/lbs
 
S

speedytang

Founding Member
Jul 28, 1999
765
1
17
Marengo,Ohio,US
Mar 27, 2006
#19
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #19
You want a cheap 75hp use nitrous and feel what 130ftlbs of torque feels like.
 

QU!CK

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
146
0
0
Charlotte, NC
Mar 27, 2006
#20
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #20
#'s aren't that bad. Congrats!


-J
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

My DYNO #s are in!
  • hotmustang331
  • May 14, 2008
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 16, 2008
CENTENNIALSTANG
C
C
DYNOED BRENSPEED AND BAMA TODAY
  • CLUBSFIT
  • Jul 8, 2007
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
7K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jul 28, 2007
mongoose101
M
U
FordGeek dyno's and mods his GT500
  • Uncle Meat
  • Jul 24, 2006
  • 2007 - 2014 Shelby GT500 Tech
Replies
11
Views
6K
2007 - 2014 Shelby GT500 Tech Aug 2, 2006
four six
Dyno #'s are in needs some big changes.
  • Venom351R
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
18
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 14, 2004
Venom351R
B
Roush Intake Dyno Numbers
  • baglock1
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
12
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 29, 2004
mo_dingo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?