• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Economy and power from a H/C/I combo

  • Thread starter Thread starter dstang01
  • Start date Start date Dec 8, 2006
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
36
Vancouver, BC
Dec 8, 2006
#1
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #1
Ive been wondering about this for awhile. Because the stock 5.0 intake and heads are so restrictive, and the cam isnt optimized, can changing your top end actually help gas mileage as well as power if you choose a more mild combo? It makes sense that with more efficient parts, the engine should run more efficiently and get better economy and power. For example the ls1 is a pushrod engine like the 5.0 and it also has .7L more displacement, yet it makes much more power and gets better mileage as well. I know new technology has to do with it, but arent re really just retrofitting new technology to our motors when we modify? What do you guys think?
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,103
2,711
224
Vass, NC
Dec 9, 2006
#2
  • Dec 9, 2006
  • #2
Increased compression ratio is a big difference between the LS1 and the 5.0. A leaner tune, increased CR, and a cam optimized for gas mileage and free flowing heads, intake, maf, and TB would go a long way toward increasing gas mileage. I doubt there's any reason why you couldn't get 30mpg if you tried to do it with a 5.0.

You still won't have the low Cd of the vette, and Camaro, so don't expect to get good gas mileage at 80mph. Also, consider that the LS1s CR is so high that it has to run premium. 20 cents per gallon makes a car that's getting 28 mpg about the same cost to run as a 25 mpg car that runs on the cheap stuff.

And, the money it takes to build a combo that's fuel efficient will never pay for itself. Lets say you go from 20mpg to 26mpg in your mustang (a realistic difference if you go with a mild cam. Whereas $1,000 for aluminum heads, $450 for intake, $250 cam, $200 for injectors, $200 for MAF, $200 for throttle body, $80 for pullies, $100 to install (doing it yourself), and $500 for a dyno tune adds up to $2,900. At $2.30/gal, you'd have to go 109,275 miles (check my math if you like) driving lightly (yeah right) to make up the difference assuming you wouldn't do anything smart with your money like investing if you didn't spend it on your car.

Chris
 

mustangramair

Member
Feb 24, 2004
326
0
17
43
Iowa
Dec 9, 2006
#3
  • Dec 9, 2006
  • #3
When i changed my H/C/I, my mileage stayed about the same. I average about 18 mpg. I was happy, i thought my mileage would drop.
 

CRASH7772

Member
Apr 27, 2003
401
1
16
49
NH
Dec 9, 2006
#4
  • Dec 9, 2006
  • #4
The GM's also run a 6 speed transmission with a .50 6th gear compared to the .68 of most 5 speed 5.0's. I do know of a local that runs 260RWHP and gets mid 20's MPG and runs high 12's on street tires with 3.73 gears. Of course his family member runs a dyno shop and has it dialed in.
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Dec 9, 2006
#5
  • Dec 9, 2006
  • #5
There are a lot of variables on that. Btw aren't LS1's a 6.0? But those cars have thousands of hours of design and engineering to achieve those power levels and mileage. And when they do those gas mileage test how are they doin them? Its more than likely a controlled environment and on a dyno or some type of rollers where they are granny drivin it. Not out here in the real world where Johnny is gonna be punchin it from stop light to stoplight.

Aftermarkets parts for our cars are just to go fast.
 

90_Red_LX

Member
Sep 29, 2003
668
5
19
38
Asheboro, NC
Dec 9, 2006
#6
  • Dec 9, 2006
  • #6
bubba-dough said:
There are a lot of variables on that. Btw aren't LS1's a 6.0? But those cars have thousands of hours of design and engineering to achieve those power levels and mileage. And when they do those gas mileage test how are they doin them? Its more than likely a controlled environment and on a dyno or some type of rollers where they are granny drivin it. Not out here in the real world where Johnny is gonna be punchin it from stop light to stoplight.

Aftermarkets parts for our cars are just to go fast.
Click to expand...


Ls1 is a 5.7 which is no longer in production idt, and the ls2 is it's replacement. The ls2 is the 6.0.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
924
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Next Generation LED Technology - Meet the SL2 Pro LED Bulb | Diode Dynamics
  • Diode Dynamics
  • Mar 22, 2024
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
1
Views
842
Vendor Sponsor Forums Apr 11, 2024
Diode Dynamics
Engine New to camshafts...what all do I need to purchase to do it right?
  • 5ltr7up
  • Mar 15, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 17, 2023
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?