• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

ECT Relocate...Have Some ??'s

  • Thread starter Thread starter FobraR
  • Start date Start date Oct 8, 2006
F

FobraR

Member
Jul 11, 2003
120
0
17
Southern California
Oct 8, 2006
#1
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #1
I am thinking of removing the heater hard line due to leaks, which would force me to relocate the ECT sensor directly into the manifold where the hard line use to go. I already have the adapter to thread it in, so that's not the issue. The issue is, will having the ECT sensor directly in the lower manifold cause any different readings than the stock location? My thinking was that it will now tell the ECU a higher temp due to the heat transfer of the manifold directly on the sensor. Does this make sense to anyone? Will it indeed have any ill-effects?

Any help is appreciated. TIA
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Oct 8, 2006
#2
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #2
Since the water circulates through the tubing that the ECT mounts in, the tubing only gets as hot as the water. The intake manifold is the same way. Your ECT should be fine mounted in the intake manifold.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Oct 8, 2006
#3
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #3
I think you should get very similar readings.
I doubt there would be enough of a difference to notice.

If you are worried about it drive the car a little with a voltmeter hooked up to the ECT, and see what typical readings are.
The do the swap, and see what kind of readings you get in the new location.

If there is a major difference, then you may want to switch back, but I doubt that will be the case.

You are talking about keeping the sensor in the front passenger corner of the lower intake, correct?


EDIT:
I am not sure that the threads of the ECT will mate up to the heater threads in the intake. I think the intake threads are larger?

jason
 

Mike86Stang

Advanced Member
Apr 11, 2000
10,296
0
77
Red Lion, PA
Oct 8, 2006
#4
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #4
I agree the diffrence will probably be minimal. Besides the heater tubes are bolted / fastened to the intake manifold so there is some natural heat transfer taking place there anyhow.

Mike
 
F

FobraR

Member
Jul 11, 2003
120
0
17
Southern California
Oct 8, 2006
#5
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #5
vristang said:
You are talking about keeping the sensor in the front passenger corner of the lower intake, correct?


EDIT:
I am not sure that the threads of the ECT will mate up to the heater threads in the intake. I think the intake threads are larger?

jason
Click to expand...

Yes it will stay in the pass side front manifold spot. I already have the 1/2" to 3/8" adapter to make it fit.

Now I have to figure out a way to keep coolant flowing through the egr spacer. I was thinking of either tapping the t-stat housing and add a barbed fitting there, or adding a barbed fitting to the rear driver side of the manifold.

Which do you think would have more coolant flow through the egr spacer?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Oct 8, 2006
#6
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #6
I would think that putting the egr outlet on the rad side of the stat may change the performance of the egr cooling system.
For example, the egr lines wouldn't see as much flow until the stat had opened.
I may be wrong on that though.


I would try to stay as close to Factory as possible.

Maybe you can tap a hole next to the new location of the ECT?




jason
 
F

FobraR

Member
Jul 11, 2003
120
0
17
Southern California
Oct 12, 2006
#7
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #7
vristang said:
I would think that putting the egr outlet on the rad side of the stat may change the performance of the egr cooling system.
For example, the egr lines wouldn't see as much flow until the stat had opened.
I may be wrong on that though.


I would try to stay as close to Factory as possible.

Maybe you can tap a hole next to the new location of the ECT?




jason
Click to expand...

I think you are correct in thinking about the coolant flow not being present until the t-stat opened, so thats a no go. And I don't want to tap a new hole in the lower seeing that its a brand new TFS unit.

Anyone have suggestions on where/how I can still hook up the egr coolant line?

*Would hooking it up from rear driver side manifold, to front of egr spacer, out rear of egr spacer to the rear pass side manifold coolant port present any coolant flow through the spacer?*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
742
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
M
Engine 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
500
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Mustang5L5
V
Cooling fan low speed not turning on
  • vman
  • Feb 27, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
587
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 24, 2025
vman
V
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
602
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?