• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Edelbrock Victor EFI on 94-95 ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amievil844
  • Start date Start date Nov 15, 2007
A

amievil844

New Member
Nov 15, 2007
5
0
0
Nov 15, 2007
#1
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #1
Has anyone installed a Victor EFI on a 1994-1995 without changing the TB and inlet setup to fox style.
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
Nov 15, 2007
#2
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #2
Thats a pretty big intake....what kinda motor you putting it on?
I dunno if you have to switch to the fox setup but it def. wont fit under the stock hood and you may need to get some new fuel rails.
 
A

amievil844

New Member
Nov 15, 2007
5
0
0
Nov 15, 2007
#3
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #3
S/C 347 have complete aeromotive fuel kit from rails to tank and a tall cowl hood so those are no problem.
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
Nov 15, 2007
#4
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #4
Ok never mind then....Some of the guys here with 1 million hp combos should chime in soon enough.
 
A

amievil844

New Member
Nov 15, 2007
5
0
0
Nov 15, 2007
#5
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #5
Was a good response though...It may still end up being to big but it was for a really good price.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 15, 2007
#6
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #6
If you are talking about the shortest length runner in the Edelbrock line

I can say my RPM does fit fine under the stock hood

I've only seen pics of the Victor
but
It seems to be like mine with shorter runners

This intake is gonna be pretty soft down low

Most use it with more cubes or a blower and the like

I'd say it would not be optimum for a typical NA 302 street combo

Grady
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
Nov 15, 2007
#7
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #7
final5-0 said:
If you are talking about the shortest length runner in the Edelbrock line

I can say my RPM does fit fine under the stock hood

I've only seen pics of the Victor
but
It seems to be like mine with shorter runners

This intake is gonna be pretty soft down low

Most use it with more cubes or a blower and the like

I'd say it would not be optimum for a typical NA 302 street combo

Grady
Click to expand...

S/C 347 have complete aeromotive fuel kit from rails to tank and a tall cowl hood so those are no problem.

I Think u missed this Grady..
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Nov 15, 2007
#8
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #8
I wouldn't see that being a problem
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 15, 2007
#9
  • Nov 15, 2007
  • #9
DDSTANG94 said:
S/C 347 have complete aeromotive fuel kit from rails to tank and a tall cowl hood so those are no problem.

I Think u missed this Grady..
Click to expand...

I certainly did

So in that case ...
Your application is more appropriate for that intake

Grady
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
Nov 16, 2007
#10
  • Nov 16, 2007
  • #10
If anything the oil fill tube may get in the way, but cant really think of anything else. Any TB adapter you get, you will prolly have to port the crap out of, to make it match. But other than that you should be fine.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Nov 16, 2007
#11
  • Nov 16, 2007
  • #11
The tb opening is only 75mm on the Victor. Mine's been opened up to 80mm . I switched to a fox tb so I can't really help here... I don't see any reason why it can't be made to fit with the 94-95 elbow though.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 16, 2007
#12
  • Nov 16, 2007
  • #12
Low-5.0 said:
The tb opening is only 75mm on the Victor. Mine's been opened up to 80mm . I switched to a fox tb so I can't really help here... I don't see any reason why it can't be made to fit with the 94-95 elbow though.
Click to expand...

I do believe the TFS elbow is less restrictive than the Edel elbow
and
It comes from the factory with a larger opening IIRC

Grady
 
A

amievil844

New Member
Nov 15, 2007
5
0
0
Nov 17, 2007
#13
  • Nov 17, 2007
  • #13
Thanks for he help guys didnt think it would be a problem...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
a Pro-M EFI system
  • maximilian macdoanald
  • Feb 6, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
7
Views
596
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 5, 2026
X-cam34
X
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
268
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
414
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
272
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
98
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?