• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Emissions Test Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter vristang
  • Start date Start date Sep 17, 2006

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Sep 17, 2006
#1
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #1
All tests were done at the same Test Facility using the same Test Equipment. Test Operators did very however.
Tested vehicle was an N/A 1987 Mustang Coupe. Mileage was 134,093 on first test, and 136,268 on final test (#4).
Other than the Catalytic Converter being removed, the car was in good running order for first test and all other tests. No Diagnostic codes were present.
<?***:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o> </o>
<o> </o>
Baseline Test
____&shy;______Tested____Limit_____Result
HC Cruise___160______160______Pass
HC Idle_____709______220______FAIL!!!
CO Cruise___.51_______1.1______Pass
CO Idle_____.54_______1.2______Pass
Other than the lack of cats the car was in good running condition.
<o> </o>
<o> </o>
Re-Test #2
__________Tested____Limit_____Result
HC Cruise___142______160______Pass
HC Idle_____650______220______FAIL!!!
CO Cruise___.51_______1.1______Pass
CO Idle_____.48_______1.2______Pass
Added New O2 Sensor, increased tire pressure to 52psi, disconnected fan to get engine hotter (good for reducing HC). Had run "Guaranteed to Pass" in previous tank (followed directions)
<o> </o>
<o> </o>
Re-Test #3
__________Tested____Limit_____Result
HC Cruise___173______160______FAIL!!!
HC Idle_____551______220______FAIL!!!
CO Cruise___.53_______1.1______Pass
CO Idle_____.61_______1.2______Pass
Replaced Factory N/A short block with Used Factory Turbo Block; this was due to a hole in Piston #4. Plugged the fan back in.
<o> </o>
<o> </o>
Re-Test #4
__________Tested____Limit_____Result
HC Cruise____44______160______Pass
HC Idle______61______220______Pass
CO Cruise___.06_______1.1______Pass
CO Idle_____.04_______1.2______Pass
A NEW Catalytic Converter from MagnaFlow had just been installed. At the time of the test, the cat had about 125 miles on it.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 18, 2006
#2
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #2
Man, that old catalytic converter must have been really far gone.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Sep 18, 2006
#3
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #3
There was no CAT on the first 3 tests.

I guess the whole reason I posted the results was to show how the typical "tricks" don't do nearly enough to get you through.

ALL emissions equipment needs to be present.

jason
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 18, 2006
#4
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #4
Alright, but when it did have a cat, the emissions were cut by 300-900%.

It was a dyno test like CA does, right? It's hard enough to pass when everything is working, let alone when part of the emissions system is non-functional or missing.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 18, 2006
#5
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #5
doh!
 

evintho

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 12, 2003
683
245
73
Santa Rosa, CA.
Sep 18, 2006
#6
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #6
Please enlighten me. What does inflating your tire pressure to 52 lbs accomplish and the reasoning behind it, please. Not trying to be a jerk, but I live in California and any trick that I don't know about, I want to learn!
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 19, 2006
#7
  • Sep 19, 2006
  • #7
It works the same way having properly inflated tires slightly improves your fuel economy. The more pressure, the harder the tire is and the less it flexes as you drive. Think of riding a bicycle with low tires vs. aired up tires. The less power and thus fuel you use maintaining your speed on the smog dyno, the less emissions.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Sep 19, 2006
#8
  • Sep 19, 2006
  • #8
65ShelbyClone said:
It works the same way having properly inflated tires slightly improves your fuel economy. The more pressure, the harder the tire is and the less it flexes as you drive. Think of riding a bicycle with low tires vs. aired up tires. The less power and thus fuel you use maintaining your speed on the smog dyno, the less emissions.
Click to expand...

Bingo!
It reduces rolling drag on the dyno.
I got the idea to try that becasue the HC's were so dang high.


I have read many posts from guys saying that a car could pass emissions without the cats. I always thought this was a bunch of hockey, so I took the opportunity to play with some of the "tricks" that had been mentioned.

No way that car would pass without the cat.

jason
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?