• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Engine Intake Cover

  • Thread starter Thread starter REDFIRE 05 GT
  • Start date Start date Nov 27, 2004

REDFIRE 05 GT

New Member
Nov 18, 2004
283
0
0
Junction City KS
Nov 27, 2004
#1
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #1
What happened to this awsome intake cover Ford?

http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/wallpaper/05/32.jpg
 

ShelbyMan

New Member
Oct 9, 2004
128
0
0
Nov 27, 2004
#2
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #2
That was a pre-production photo. Ford had pulled it off, of course. It is not available. No Aftermarkets that I am aware of....yet..

It is highly desired amongst 05 owners
 

jmk97GT

Member
Oct 29, 2004
178
0
16
Nov 27, 2004
#3
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #3
Probably took it off so they could sell it after market.
 

zinn

New Member
Oct 30, 2004
19
0
0
Nov 27, 2004
#4
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #4
jmk97GT said:
Probably took it off so they could sell it after market.
Click to expand...

nah, i think it was just a cost cutter. the designers and the bean counters have to aurgue over ever little piece and i think the bean counters won that one.
 

sveet

Founding Member
Jun 8, 2002
703
0
0
Snow Belt!
Nov 27, 2004
#5
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #5
Cover is just added weight. No function.

I vote to leave it off. Looks good without it.
 

thehemi

New Member
Dec 2, 2002
73
0
0
Texas
Nov 27, 2004
#6
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #6
Without pictures, please. Thanks.
 
T

tangerine

Member
Apr 6, 2003
555
0
16
millen, ga
Nov 27, 2004
#7
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #7
the motor would have looked a lot better with it on there
 

Badsnke98

Member
Nov 4, 2001
43
0
6
Clinton Twp, MI
Nov 27, 2004
#8
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #8
I want it, looks much more finished.
 
P

Paul Pysher

New Member
Nov 20, 2004
13
0
0
Nov 28, 2004
#9
  • Nov 28, 2004
  • #9
I think it looks better with it on also, but it probably would have added to the price of the car.
 

jmk97GT

Member
Oct 29, 2004
178
0
16
Nov 28, 2004
#10
  • Nov 28, 2004
  • #10
Whats the cover made out of?
 

RandyB

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
307
0
0
Tx.
Nov 28, 2004
#11
  • Nov 28, 2004
  • #11
sveet said:
Cover is just added weight. No function.

I vote to leave it off. Looks good without it.
Click to expand...

What he said...

I wish I had some covers to sell people though...
 
R

Rainz

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
14
0
0
Nov 28, 2004
#12
  • Nov 28, 2004
  • #12
Don't get me wrong I love the new GT's but when it comes down to it to get the price out of the 30k range ford went cheap with alot of stuff like the suspension. An engine cover wouldn't make that much of a difference but still, I'm not surprised.

Now I don't want anyone biting my head off because I don't like the suspension, and I know ford said it was for drag racing but we all know that it was to be cheap.
 

REDFIRE 05 GT

New Member
Nov 18, 2004
283
0
0
Junction City KS
Nov 28, 2004
#13
  • Nov 28, 2004
  • #13
Rainz said:
Don't get me wrong I love the new GT's but when it comes down to it to get the price out of the 30k range ford went cheap with alot of stuff like the suspension. An engine cover wouldn't make that much of a difference but still, I'm not surprised.

Now I don't want anyone biting my head off because I don't like the suspension, and I know ford said it was for drag racing but we all know that it was to be cheap.
Click to expand...


well you pretty much asked for it...the suspension is not cheap, car holds more on a skid pad than most other cars. A three link with a panhard rod from the factory and 355 gears...obviously you have not driven one. I hate the IRS setup...wheel hop is not a problem here. Coil over struts on the front....find them on your stang or did you have buy them after market?
 
S

Stang2k5

New Member
Oct 22, 2004
187
0
0
Nov 30, 2004
#14
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #14
REDFIRE 05 GT said:
What happened to this awsome intake cover Ford?
Click to expand...

I hope they at least sell it as a aftermarket part
 
P

Paul Pysher

New Member
Nov 20, 2004
13
0
0
Nov 30, 2004
#15
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #15
I agree looks alot better with it on
 

sveet

Founding Member
Jun 8, 2002
703
0
0
Snow Belt!
Nov 30, 2004
#16
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #16
I am just curious, are any of you "pro-engine cover" guy's the same guy's who all hated the fake hood and side scoops on the '02-'04's????

As far as the rear suspension thing goes, only one answer for no IRS.....CHEAP.

If a solid axle was the way to go you would see them using them on Enzo's, Ford GT's, Porsche GT's, Vette's, etc.... Fact is the Stang is the ONLY car with sporting intentions with a solid axle.

Ford did a great job with it, but they did it because it was cheap.
 
P

Paul Pysher

New Member
Nov 20, 2004
13
0
0
Nov 30, 2004
#17
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #17
I think that was there reasoning, to keep the price of the car under 30,000.
 

RandyB

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
307
0
0
Tx.
Nov 30, 2004
#18
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #18
They probably realized how silly it was since it served no purpose, like those scoops on previous models.

I honestly like the bare composite manifold better though.
 

Scott_B

"1 Arm Wonder! "
Founding Member
Oct 27, 1998
4,197
0
66
NS Canada!
Nov 30, 2004
#19
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #19
And they kept it because thats what all the stang owners wanted. People complained when they suggested the next GT have IRS. All the drag racers wanted the live rear. So they got it, and a nice version too!
 
M

MarSaleenMustan

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
208
0
0
San Bernardino California
Nov 30, 2004
#20
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #20
REDFIRE 05 GT said:
What happened to this awsome intake cover Ford?

http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/wallpaper/05/32.jpg
Click to expand...

Actually according to Popular Hotroding's latest issue(the one with the yellow Mustang on the cover) says that it will be available as a dealer installed item... as far as the bickering for the no IRS suspenson please stop that, there are far more mustang drag racers out there than there are road racers, dont get me wrong, i like road racing too, but the for what it is the Mustang should have rightfully stayed a solid rear axle car as it did. If handling is truly your passion(even then all the reviews i've heard is that it handles great) then either wait for a special edition stang(possibly a boss 302 or cobra) or modify it even more.... of course if you HAVE to have IRS then just wait for one of the SE cars. By the way i remember reading on a magazine somewhere that there really wasnt that much difference in cost between a solid axle and an IRS set up. It was in the neigborhood of around 300 bucks or so, granted this was for the old "fox-4" chassis.


 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
97 GT with 03 explorer Eddie Bauer edition 4.6l
  • basbill73
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
37
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
Intake element in Fender or engine bay?
  • DadLife0724
  • Apr 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
358
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 2, 2026
DadLife0724
W
I have some 4.6 questions.
  • whiskerz
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
248
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
squeak93
J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
293
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
For Sale Trick Flow Box R Series Upper Intake w/90 mm Inlet
  • Habu135
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
0
Views
108
Engine and Power Adder Apr 30, 2026
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?