• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Equal length vs. shorty's

  • Thread starter Thread starter EN7
  • Start date Start date Mar 21, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

EN7

New Member
Aug 11, 2005
15
0
0
MI
Mar 21, 2006
#1
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #1
What's the difference? I'm planning on stroking 5.0 to a 331 N/A, what would be best?
 

mred03gt

New Member
Dec 10, 2003
33
0
0
Mar 21, 2006
#2
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #2
Go for the shorties. A buddy of mine has equal length and they are always in the way of something. His a/c line gets cooked and his third plug boot as well. I like having the room to work. Good luck.

Scott
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 21, 2006
#3
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #3
If I was gonna go shortys, I'd not do equals

Why go to the expense of the stroker and not go LT's

Grady
 

dstanggt50

Founding Member
Sep 13, 2000
1,316
0
0
Woodinville, WA
Mar 21, 2006
#4
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #4
I had a spark plug wire burning problem w/my mac equals, why I switched to full lengths, I would either do full lenghts, or unequals.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Mar 21, 2006
#5
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #5
I think there's some confusion in here .....

There are 2 types of shorty headers. Equal & unequal length.

Then there are long tube headers.


As for the shorties, equal length ones are supposed to show a tad more power, but they're still not worth the trouble. They're supposedly tougher to install. So if you go with shorty headers, it might pay to go unequal. But as Grady said, after doing the stroker, I don't see a reason NOT to do LT's.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Mar 21, 2006
#6
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #6
You won't see/feel much difference between unequals vs. equals. For a 331 long tubes are the way to go for sure.
 

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
Mar 22, 2006
#7
  • Mar 22, 2006
  • #7
Are the LTs emission legal? This is something to think about if you have emissions (i.e. the visual test). I don't know-just a thought.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 22, 2006
#8
  • Mar 22, 2006
  • #8
Methodical said:
Are the LTs emission legal? This is something to think about if you have emissions (i.e. the visual test). I don't know-just a thought.
Click to expand...

A very good point Al

Before doing my current combo, I stopped by the place that I have do my personal inspections, and oil changes for the work truck to see what they had to say.

They said in my area, if you follow the letter of the law, LT's are not legal.
however
They also said, this subject comes up so often, the practice is:
if all emissions equipment is in place
and
the car passes the test on the roller's

LT's will not fail the car

Again, this is in my local part of the woods

Grady
 
B

BaXTeR3221

Member
Jan 12, 2004
917
0
16
Orange County, NY
Mar 23, 2006
#9
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #9
Like the others said, i dont think the equal lengths are worth the trouble. The gains would be minimal and if your going through the hassle of installing them you might as well go straight to longtubes.
 

EN7

New Member
Aug 11, 2005
15
0
0
MI
Apr 13, 2006
#10
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #10
If I went with long tubes, wouldn't I have to swap out my x pipe?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 13, 2006
#11
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #11
EN7 said:
If I went with long tubes, wouldn't I have to swap out my x pipe?
Click to expand...

Yes you will

but

LT's do give a noticable gain over shortys

With the extra cubes ... you want the LT's

Just sell your pipe to offset the cost to switch

Grady
 

TrickStang37

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
292
0
0
Apr 13, 2006
#12
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #12
I lost all my dyno data, but basically the shorties made a tiny bit more low end <3400rpm AND top end >4800rpm while the equal lengths made a tiny bit more from 3400-4800 but on average from 3000-5400 they were the same. as for the longtubes, i made the same exact power with the equal lengths vs the longtubes except the longtubes made about 30 rwtq more at 3000rpm but that advantage was gone by 4200rpm or so and hp was the same after.
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Apr 13, 2006
#13
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #13
TrickStang37 said:
I lost all my dyno data, but basically the shorties made a tiny bit more low end <3400rpm AND top end >4800rpm while the equal lengths made a tiny bit more from 3400-4800 but on average from 3000-5400 they were the same. as for the longtubes, i made the same exact power with the equal lengths vs the longtubes except the longtubes made about 30 rwtq more at 3000rpm but that advantage was gone by 4200rpm or so and hp was the same after.
Click to expand...
That perfectly illustrates the stereotype for each class of header. Thanks for the data.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 13, 2006
#14
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #14
Torque down low is a nice thing for a street car

Grady
 

TrickStang37

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
292
0
0
Apr 13, 2006
#15
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #15
GRGT1994 said:
That perfectly illustrates the stereotype for each class of header. Thanks for the data.
Click to expand...
i didnt really get it, was that a bash?? i dont own that car anymore (sold it last month) and the computer i had with all my data and racing formulas and such crashed and everything was lost.
 

SWYZ721

Member
Aug 24, 2004
208
0
16
Ann Arbor, MI
Apr 13, 2006
#16
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #16
How much do you have to lift the engine for longtubes?

My passenger side equals have burned through the padding on some sort of line, would it be worth the $300 to switch to un-equals?
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Apr 13, 2006
#17
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #17
SWYZ721 said:
would it be worth the $300 to switch to un-equals?
Click to expand...

I didn't pay near that for my un-equals! My BBK's were $179.88 from Summit. The ceramic version of the same headers are $100 more, though.

If you currently have the equals and are wanting/needing to upgrade ... I say go LT's.



The BBK LT's are $279.88. Again .... $100 more for the ceramic ones.
 

SWYZ721

Member
Aug 24, 2004
208
0
16
Ann Arbor, MI
Apr 13, 2006
#18
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #18
SeventyMach1 said:
The BBK LT's are $279.88. Again .... $100 more for the ceramic ones.
Click to expand...

right, but what else do I need?

A new mid-pipe, how much does those cost? 02 extenders? I don't have the MIL eliminators and I am not getting a CEL, would I need one with LTs?

Don't I also compromise ground clearance, if I wanted to lower the car?

The price adds up quick.

Do you think it's worth it?
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Apr 13, 2006
#19
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #19
SWYZ721 said:
A new mid-pipe, how much does those cost?
Click to expand...
Last time I inquired ... they cost a little less than regular mid-pipes.



02 extenders?
Click to expand...
Yep. EDIT: I guess you can re-route them.



I don't have the MIL eliminators and I am not getting a CEL, would I need one with LTs?
Click to expand...
Unless you swapped to a 4.6 .... you will never need them.



Don't I also compromise ground clearance, if I wanted to lower the car?
Click to expand...
Yep. A little. Maybe someone who has lowered their car and has LT's will also chime in to give their first hand experience.
 

SWYZ721

Member
Aug 24, 2004
208
0
16
Ann Arbor, MI
Apr 13, 2006
#20
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #20
Because you need extenders, then the distance of the 02 has changed, definately a no-no, how does this affect the computer and driveability?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Dipstick
  • wccurtis1963
  • Jun 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
166
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
Willybill32
Gt40 e303 combo questions
  • 99mustanggt2018
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
449
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 30, 2025
KRUISR
C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
439
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
M
Bracket for radio with equalizer vs without
  • MartinM
  • Mar 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
298
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 18, 2025
Mustang5L5
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
119
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?