• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Exhaust for a 2.3L NA

  • Thread starter Thread starter jasoncarmony
  • Start date Start date Mar 11, 2004
J

jasoncarmony

New Member
Mar 2, 2004
37
0
0
Live wherever the Air Force sends me. Right now I
Mar 11, 2004
#1
  • Mar 11, 2004
  • #1
I am thinking of installing a ranger header on my car for the short term, but i need to know what type of exhaust system i should get. i there anything i could get for a good price that would help horsepower?
 
D

Dan'l

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2001
1,539
0
0
wisconsin
Mar 12, 2004
#2
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #2
Dump it into a 3" sidepipe!
 
J

jasoncarmony

New Member
Mar 2, 2004
37
0
0
Live wherever the Air Force sends me. Right now I
Mar 12, 2004
#3
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #3
what kind, do you have a website i could check this out at?
 

nomuffler

Member
Aug 20, 2003
330
0
16
Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless
Mar 12, 2004
#4
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #4
<-------- Everyone says no backpressure kills power, they're right. But the thing is slow anyway, loud cars are cool.


Seriously though, Alot of fo seem to like fake dual exhaust pipes. I need more than dual exhaust to make me look cool, so I never saw the point behind them. Dynomax superturbo mufflers are highly regarded as well. I've always liked dynomax, though I've never heard a 2.3 with one. I can't imagine how honky a blowmaster would sound. I'd probably go with two inch if my stang still ran, and I got a "real" exhaust system put on it. If you're gonna get a whole new system you might want to look into a long tube header instead of the ranger piece. I belive Pacesetter makes one. I'd probably go with 2", maybe 2 1/4" that'd be pretty big though. What do I know though?
 
S

SPEED FREAK

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,448
0
0
Regina, SK.
Mar 12, 2004
#5
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #5
well I guess it all depends on your power ambitions. I personally would use a single 2 1/2" into a dynomax race magnum muffler and dump it. that would sound mean and flow up to about 250 hp or so with little problems. On a N/A 2.3 build that would be a hard target to reach so you should be ok.
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Mar 12, 2004
#6
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #6
If you wanna put in a V8 anyway, why bother with exhaust now? Might as well save the money.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Mar 12, 2004
#7
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #7
Red_LX said:
If you wanna put in a V8 anyway, why bother with exhaust now? Might as well save the money.
Click to expand...

I agree if your going to turbo it or V-8 it I would just leave it alone unless its falling apart right now. If you really must have a exhaust, I wouldn't go any bigger than a 2 1/4 with a single pipe, high flow cat, high flow muffler and delete the pre cat if its got one. Now if you can get a ranger header use it I've heard good things on a 2.3L with one. As for duels, I love duels my self but I couldn't get past the fact that it would be fake and a waste of money so I went single pipe on my N/A 2.3L. It took some time to get uses to but it really don't look to bad.
 
K

ka0tyk

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
1,610
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
Mar 12, 2004
#8
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #8
http://www.j0o.com/misc/ka0tyk.mp3

pace setter longtube header

no catalytic converte
rs

y pipe

2 spintech mufflers

3" stainless steel tips out back

all 2 1/2"





no comments aboutthe gt symbols please. the car will have a 347 swapped in about 3 months...hehe.
 
T

Tru_Blue_104

New Member
Nov 13, 2003
218
0
0
MN
Mar 14, 2004
#9
  • Mar 14, 2004
  • #9
All I did on my 2.3 NA is put on a ranger header, and a Dynomax Super Turbo. I think the Super Turbo has a 2 1/4 inlet/outlet instead of just the 2, I just used adapters. As for power, big difference, it just has a lot more torque (a lot compared to before). Also, it sounds great, its not loud when crusing, but it does have a nice low mellow sound. I really recomend it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Dipstick
  • wccurtis1963
  • Jun 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
160
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
Willybill32
W
top loader transmissions
  • WilliamJCC.
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
92
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 6, 2026
70mstang
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
560
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
82
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
361
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?