• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Experiance with sensors

  • Thread starter Thread starter CRASH7772
  • Start date Start date Feb 18, 2004

CRASH7772

Member
Apr 27, 2003
401
1
16
NH
Feb 18, 2004
#1
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #1
Was looking into replacing some of the sensors on the 87GT (which are all original except for TPS and EGR) but was wondering if the aftermarket ones are better than the "OEM" ones. I know alot of companies make parts for the "OEM" parts. I wanted to replace the O2 sensors, look into the ACT sensors, and maybe pick up another TPS becuase the "OEM" one I have now I can't set it to where in needs to be on the volt meter. The car has around 80,000 so with the age and miles combined I'm sure it's due. That and the car ran very rich last summer.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Feb 19, 2004
#2
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #2
i play it by ear with sensors. some stuff like TPS (i know you already did yours) and TFI seem to have the least problems when using an oem unit.
others i play it by ear. if it is really expensive for the oem sensor, i use parts store stuff. also, if it can kill the car (TFI, etc) i get good ones.

for running rich, really check out the O2's (Bosch replacements seem to work well), the ECT (engine coolant temp sensor), ACT, etc. a DMM used to test them cold and then hot will tell you what gives. the Probst manual is awesome for testing these things (i dont have it, but i have excerpts). when i need more than is available in here and in Haynes, i will spend the 20 bucks on one.

good luck.
 

CRASH7772

Member
Apr 27, 2003
401
1
16
NH
Feb 19, 2004
#3
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #3
Well if you see in my sig, I'm getting ready to swap intakes and though I might just replace some of the sensors that would be easier to get to during the swap. I'm pretty sure the O2's are shot and alot of people seem to like the Bosch O2 sensors. Thanks for the input......
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Feb 19, 2004
#4
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #4
No need to replace the ACT or ECT - they are thermistors and they are good or they are bad. Test with and ohmeter and varying water temps like mentioned.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Feb 19, 2004
#5
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #5
FYI here's the table for ACT & ECT sensors...

Pin 25 ACT signal in. at 50 degrees F it should be 3.5 volts. It is a good number if the ACT is mounted in the inlet airbox. If it is mounted in the lower intake manifold, the voltage readings will be lower because of the heat transfer. Here's the table :

68 degrees F = 3.02 v
86 degrees F = 2.62 v
104 degrees F = 2.16 v
122 degrees F = 1.72 v
140 degrees F = 1.35 v
158 degrees F = 1.04 v
176 degrees F = .80 v
194 degrees F = .61

Ohms measures at the computer with the computer disconnected, or at the sensor with the sensor disconnected.
50 degrees F = 58.75 K ohms
68 degrees F = 37.30 K ohms
86 degrees F = 27.27 K ohms
104 degrees F = 16.15 K ohms
122 degrees F = 10.97 K ohms
140 degrees F = 7.60 K ohms
158 degrees F = 5.37 K ohms
176 degrees F = 3.84 K ohms
194 degrees F = 2.80 K ohms

The ACT & ECT have the same thermistor, so the table values are the same
Pin 7 ECT signal in. at 176 degrees F it should be .80 volts
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
772
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
A
2020 Ford Mustang GT P0036, P0138, P0141 02 sensor help
  • AmkoA
  • Jul 29, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
325
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 5, 2025
skkrtis
S
M
Engine 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
517
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
I want to fix my car that is emitting rich black smoke.
  • sands9330014
  • Mar 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
71
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 19, 2025
sands9330014
S
M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
94
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2026
Mhaley2006
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?