• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Failed California Smog!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter FastGT02
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

FastGT02

New Member
Aug 7, 2006
22
0
0
Aug 31, 2008
#1
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #1
Well, I had a friend who knew that i wouldn't pass the visual, smog my car for me. Guess what, It failed the machine test... Uhhhh. He would look past the fact that I had a catted X-pipe on my car, however it failed the computer system. I was under the impression this thing would pass everything in California but the Visual. Am i wrong, or is there something wrong with my car?? My mods are in my sig, not too mention i put back on my stock Maf system just in case. Any help as to why this happened? Thank goodness he did a pre-test, so that Sacramento has no record of me failing anything....
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Aug 31, 2008
#2
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #2
You need you stock mid-pipe to pass. I put mine on every other year for it.
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Aug 31, 2008
#3
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #3
You need 4 low flo cats not 2 high flow ones. AKA stock h-pipe. My car passed with flying colors with all my mods but the stock h-pipe swaped back in.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Aug 31, 2008
#4
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #4
what was the real reason for the failure, did you have stored codes, or did you fail tailpipe?
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Aug 31, 2008
#5
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #5
bdcardinal said:
what was the real reason for the failure, did you have stored codes, or did you fail tailpipe?
Click to expand...

He said he failed the machine test so i assume that means tailpipe.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Aug 31, 2008
#6
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #6
machine test can also include the OBDII portion, as both are out of the operators hands to interfere with.
 

FastGT02

New Member
Aug 7, 2006
22
0
0
Aug 31, 2008
#7
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #7
It was tailpipe. As far as the max readings go.... The max for 15mph is 52. I measured 58. For 25mph the max is 36 i measured 45. I was kinda shocked.. I totally thought the catted x would pass diagnostics. I just changed the oil and beat the crap out of it the way there. Oh well. Just kind of ticks me off. He told me how mustangs have tougher emissions than most cars. I was surprised to learn this.. Im just mad that a 1980 Nissan blowing black smoke will pass with flying colors yet i get the shaft. Oh well. Thats life, guess.
 

myponyrocks

I have more billet on the Stang than most women ha
Apr 18, 2004
1,219
0
37
Aug 31, 2008
#8
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #8
Sounds to me like you let the cats cool down before you tested?
 
D

darkside03gt

Member
Feb 19, 2007
851
8
18
Sacramento CA
Aug 31, 2008
#9
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #9
you need to put the stock h-pipe back on in order to pass. some have passed with catted h and x pipes but by the skin of there teeth.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Aug 31, 2008
#10
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #10
Did you reset the computer prior to heading in? I beleive if the computer was reset soon before a test it will pass a fail code.
 

FastGT02

New Member
Aug 7, 2006
22
0
0
Aug 31, 2008
#11
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #11
No, i didn't touch the computer. The car didn't cool down at all, it came right from the freeway in 3rd gear without being shut down onto the machine. I at least thought the numbers would be close..
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Aug 31, 2008
#12
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #12
My car with the stock read at the lowest portion of the emmisions scale, I dont think I had anything over single didgets. Just put your stocker back on and you will be fine.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Aug 31, 2008
#13
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #13
I've got Comp 262AH cams and assorted bolt-ons on my 02 GT and failed the sniffer test here in Ontario badly. At 40KPH, the readings were:

HC: 52ppm (limit 52)
CO: 0.01% (limit 0.29)
NO: 70ppm (limit 385)

So far so good, if a squeaker. Then they let it idle down and measure curb idle output:

HC: 772ppm (limit 150)
CO: 0.12% (limit 0.70)
NO: n/a

When I put my factory H back on, the numbers looked like this:

HC: 7ppm (limit 52)
CO: 0.01% (limit 0.29)
NO: 6ppm (limit 385)

and

HC: 7ppm (limit 150)
CO: 0.03% (limit 0.70)
NO: n/a

Put your factory H back on. The cats are superior (in terms of emissions control) to the high-flow stuff.
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Aug 31, 2008
#14
  • Aug 31, 2008
  • #14
trinity_gt said:
I've got Comp 262AH cams and assorted bolt-ons on my 02 GT and failed the sniffer test here in Ontario badly. At 40KPH, the readings were:

HC: 52ppm (limit 52)
CO: 0.01% (limit 0.29)
NO: 70ppm (limit 385)

So far so good, if a squeaker. Then they let it idle down and measure curb idle output:

HC: 772ppm (limit 150)
CO: 0.12% (limit 0.70)
NO: n/a

When I put my factory H back on, the numbers looked like this:

HC: 7ppm (limit 52)
CO: 0.01% (limit 0.29)
NO: 6ppm (limit 385)

and

HC: 7ppm (limit 150)
CO: 0.03% (limit 0.70)
NO: n/a

Put your factory H back on. The cats are superior (in terms of emissions control) to the high-flow stuff.
Click to expand...

looks like Im getting the 262s. I had heard you could pass with them but had never seen actual emmissions numbers.
 

PULMEOVR

I need a bigger E-Penis.
Sep 29, 2003
560
0
27
Ottawa, Ontario Canada
Sep 1, 2008
#15
  • Sep 1, 2008
  • #15
trinity_gt said:
I've got Comp 262AH cams and assorted bolt-ons on my 02 GT and failed the sniffer test here in Ontario badly. At 40KPH, the readings were:

HC: 52ppm (limit 52)
CO: 0.01% (limit 0.29)
NO: 70ppm (limit 385)

So far so good, if a squeaker. Then they let it idle down and measure curb idle output:

HC: 772ppm (limit 150)
CO: 0.12% (limit 0.70)
NO: n/a

When I put my factory H back on, the numbers looked like this:

HC: 7ppm (limit 52)
CO: 0.01% (limit 0.29)
NO: 6ppm (limit 385)

and

HC: 7ppm (limit 150)
CO: 0.03% (limit 0.70)
NO: n/a

Put your factory H back on. The cats are superior (in terms of emissions control) to the high-flow stuff.
Click to expand...

What high-flow mid-pipe did you have for emissions testing? I'm also from Ontario and I barely passed the emissions test with my MAC catted Prochamber. Hopefully I can pass again in 2009!

Matt
 

FastGT02

New Member
Aug 7, 2006
22
0
0
Sep 1, 2008
#16
  • Sep 1, 2008
  • #16
I assume that California is on the strictest testing system? Does this mean that my car would most likely pass in other states other than California?
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Sep 1, 2008
#17
  • Sep 1, 2008
  • #17
PULMEOVR said:
What high-flow mid-pipe did you have for emissions testing? I'm also from Ontario and I barely passed the emissions test with my MAC catted Prochamber. Hopefully I can pass again in 2009!

Matt
Click to expand...

MRT catted H. Shortly after it was first installed, I DriveCleaned it and it passed, barely. Since then I'd put the cams in it and put maybe 15,000KMs. If it was marginal new, it's not really surprising it's a fail after a few KMs and a set of mild cams...
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Sep 1, 2008
#18
  • Sep 1, 2008
  • #18
FastGT02 said:
I assume that California is on the strictest testing system? Does this mean that my car would most likely pass in other states other than California?
Click to expand...

Probably not. I'm in Canada and it sounds like we're using similar limits to you (i.e. at 40KPH, about 25MPH, our HC limit is 52ppm, same as yours.) I imagine other states with sniffer inspections will have the same limits.

I'm surprised you were okay on inspection. I thought they'd ding you for that. Up here I've heard of MoE (Ministry of the Environment) cars pulling over a Mustang and the driver being given the gears for having the incorrect mid-pipe on. The one story I heard was that the MoE guy knew that particular year of Mustang came with a 4-cat midpipe and he only saw two on the car. I thought Cali would be even more strict.
 
2

2000GTdriver

Member
May 27, 2004
47
0
6
Mile High City, Colorado
Sep 1, 2008
#19
  • Sep 1, 2008
  • #19
FastGT02 said:
I assume that California is on the strictest testing system? Does this mean that my car would most likely pass in other states other than California?
Click to expand...

We have pretty much the same emission standards here in the Denver area as you describe for Cali and Canada. I have heard that high-flow cats will probably fail the tailpipe test and will surely fail the visual one. The good news is that they are experimenting with a new test that uses a mobile van to measure emissions as you drive by on the highway. I actually passed my last test this way so it eliminates the visual check. On the other hand, if you like to drive around with an off-road pipe without cats and only swap on the real one for annual testing you will probably get caught and recieve a notice in the mail to report to your local emissions check station. In the future the drive-by vans are supposed to replace the other system, and would not "pass" cars but would only flag ones that fail. Of course the guys that own the shops that run the current roller test are fighting hard against any changes.
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Sep 1, 2008
#20
  • Sep 1, 2008
  • #20
California also has mobile smog stations which is like a portable dyno that they will set up on the side of the road and a cop will "randomly" pull people over to check them. I saw them once but they had one car on it and another waiting behind it so I didnt get pulled over.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Exhaust 4 Cats required for smog in California?
  • Codosuarus
  • Sep 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
924
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2025
Scottyding73
S
S
WTB Smog pump blues California - I Need One
  • Scottyding73
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
3
Views
194
Want to Buy Aug 25, 2025
Noobz347
F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
463
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
S
Cali Members, Get in Here! - Smog issue with possible error on 2007 Shelby GT Emissions label failed due to EGR
  • saldua
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2025
Noobz347
M
Running rough
  • Mike3
  • Dec 31, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
330
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 1, 2026
Mike3
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?