• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Fender CAI vs Engine CAI

  • Thread starter Thread starter southfillyboy
  • Start date Start date Jun 20, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

southfillyboy

Member
Aug 13, 2008
38
0
6
Jun 20, 2009
#1
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • #1
Is the fenderwell intake really that much better than one that sits in the engine. Kenne Bell says that engine ones can cause damage to the engine. Got to get a new intake so I don't know which one to get.
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Jun 20, 2009
#2
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • #2
I've never heard of the engine bay ones causing damage to the engine. Did they explain why?

The fenderwell one would draw cooler air is the only advantage I'd see.
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Jun 20, 2009
#3
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • #3
CAI kits really don't allow the engine to draw "cooler air". The air temp difference in the fender well vs. the engine bay is negligible. CAI kits really just less-restrictive intakes over stock.
 

DAKDOG99

New Member
May 29, 2006
37
0
0
COLUMBIA, S.C.
Jun 20, 2009
#4
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • #4
VEE EIGHT said:
CAI kits really don't allow the engine to draw "cooler air". The air temp difference in the fender well vs. the engine bay is negligible. CAI kits really just less-restrictive intakes over stock.
Click to expand...

I disagree. The temp under the hood from the engine and hedders has got to be warmer than the air coming into the fender well.
 
S

southfillyboy

Member
Aug 13, 2008
38
0
6
Jun 20, 2009
#5
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • #5
COramprat said:
I've never heard of the engine bay ones causing damage to the engine. Did they explain why?

The fenderwell one would draw cooler air is the only advantage I'd see.
Click to expand...

They said that fenderwells bring in 70F air while engine bay ones get around 200F air. I wonder if it really matters that much because they think adding headers is negligable powerwise.
 

Tim2002GT

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
635
4
29
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Jun 21, 2009
#6
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #6
DAKDOG99 said:
I disagree. The temp under the hood from the engine and hedders has got to be warmer than the air coming into the fender well.
Click to expand...

True, but once the car is moving, the air intake temps won't be much different. I would think the rai(engine bay style intake) would actually be better at the track because you can pull the drivers side headlight and force in the cooler air right in front of the filter.
 
C

comporange04GT

New Member
Jun 19, 2005
110
0
0
Jun 21, 2009
#7
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #7
It is a lot easier to get the filter on and off for cleaning if it is in the engine bay vs. in the fender but other than that I like the fender models. They will draw cooler air compared to the engine bay models and they look a lot better IMO.
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Jun 21, 2009
#8
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #8
DAKDOG99 said:
I disagree. The temp under the hood from the engine and hedders has got to be warmer than the air coming into the fender well.
Click to expand...

Maybe if the car was sitting still, but once its moving, you get similar air flow through both the engine bay and in the fender well. Also keep in mind that the majority of fender-well systems (if not all) have that hard 75-90 degree bend leading into the fender which would cause more restriction.
 
S

southfillyboy

Member
Aug 13, 2008
38
0
6
Jun 21, 2009
#9
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #9
Guess I'm leaning towards the engine bay setup. The filter is like a foot long and with almost a 90 degree turn I have no idea how 2 get that in there. I also have a cowl hood so that might help with engine bay temperatures.
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,256
358
164
Joplin, Missouri
Jun 22, 2009
#10
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #10
Heres a bit of info, take it as you will.

My last car was a 92 fox with a 351 high compression engine. It had an afm pms on it with the iat sensor re located to the c&l intake tube.

When I had the stock box (works just like a fenderwell cai kit, sucks air from fender) the avg intake temps were 75-80 (on a 70 degree day).

I later changed the upper elbow to one that fit under a stock hood and had to go back with a filter on the end of the maf b/c the angle was too much to fit it all back in right. My temps went to 120-130 at BEST. Got much hotter if I were in traffic while the factory box kept it cool at most all times.

Thats just my experience. Engine bay filters just offer too many oppurtunities to f chit up. Fan wash, more dirt/grease and heat are the obvious culprits.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Jun 22, 2009
#11
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #11
As far as I'm concerned, Kenne Bell's claim that engine bay intakes are dangerous is BS. I've logged my IATs with a JLT ram air intake, which draws air from the factory location inside the engine bay, and the temps were practically identical to ambient. I did use the heat shield that came with the kit, so that might have something to do with it. It might be true that an engine bay intake without a heat shield could ingest hot air, but I still doubt it, especially if the car is moving.
 

joshjwc9

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
1,095
17
39
Palm Harbor, FL
Jun 22, 2009
#12
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #12
Let me give my information I looked into before I bought my Steeda CAI which is pretty much a Ram Air Intake.

I was worried about the IAT sensor and its relocation to the bracket which the filter attaches.

I did the install of the Steeda CAI and looked at the IAT reading in my Diablo a total of 6 times.

First idle stock airbox, then cruising at 55.

Then Steeda CAI without heat shield at idle, then cruising at 55.

And then the Steeda CAI with heat shield, then at 55.

This was in mild Florida evening weather, about 80 degrees and average humidity.

First run was at about 100ish degrees and then roughly 125ish if I remember correctly.
Second run was at roughly 140, then 145ish.
Final run was 110ish and then 115ish.

The stock airbox were also checked on a cold engine as well.

I would think that this difference is negligible, especially between Ram Intakes and true Cold Air Intakes.

Also, being in FL, I drive in plenty of rain and do not need the filter to get wet, or other crap to risking going in it.

I felt the difference when installing the CAI, but it was negligible too, although my gas mileage has gone up from the K&N and stock tubing, even though I'm running the AC often now in the summer compared to the March spring weather when I got it. I don't have any complaints, and if it wasn't for the people complaining of JLT's intakes sometimes hitting the Oil Caps, and a friend having a Steeda wholesaler account always helps...
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Jun 22, 2009
#13
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #13
mine is LOW in the bumper with my blower setup....sucked up plentty of water last year in a storm, but luckily didn't ruin my engine. If you can keep it in the engine bay, do it. Kenne Bell probably just said that cause they want you to buy their kit
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Jun 22, 2009
#14
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #14
squeak93 said:
Heres a bit of info, take it as you will.

My last car was a 92 fox with a 351 high compression engine. It had an afm pms on it with the iat sensor re located to the c&l intake tube.

When I had the stock box (works just like a fenderwell cai kit, sucks air from fender) the avg intake temps were 75-80 (on a 70 degree day).

I later changed the upper elbow to one that fit under a stock hood and had to go back with a filter on the end of the maf b/c the angle was too much to fit it all back in right. My temps went to 120-130 at BEST. Got much hotter if I were in traffic while the factory box kept it cool at most all times.

Thats just my experience. Engine bay filters just offer too many oppurtunities to f chit up. Fan wash, more dirt/grease and heat are the obvious culprits.
Click to expand...

the difference in iat temps from the c&l and the stock airbox was the fact that c&ls is aluminum and the stock is plastic and rubber. aluminum is gonna retain and transfer more heat than the plastic.

i made my own cai out of abs plastic and it stays cool all the time, it has a 45degree bend with the maf and the filter in the fenderwell. the plastic does not get hott and the filter is out of the engine bay. made a noticable difference from the chrome cai i had before.
 
S

southfillyboy

Member
Aug 13, 2008
38
0
6
Jun 22, 2009
#15
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #15
So it seems like a air box for the engine bay would be a good idea or somehow find 4in ridgid tubing. I just need to find one for a 12in filter. Thanks for the comments.
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Jun 23, 2009
#16
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #16
Sounds like the K&N FIPK fits what you want. I have the kit and absolutely love it.

Low-restriction tubing
composite plastic (no heat absorbtion)
heat shield
huge filter



Whatever kit you get, stay away from those made of metal. I made the mistake of purchasing an MAC CAI (made of chrome) the first time around and I swear that I would have suffered 3rd degree burns if I had touched the thing.
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,256
358
164
Joplin, Missouri
Jun 23, 2009
#17
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #17
fastgtfairlane said:
the difference in iat temps from the c&l and the stock airbox was the fact that c&ls is aluminum and the stock is plastic and rubber. aluminum is gonna retain and transfer more heat than the plastic.

i made my own cai out of abs plastic and it stays cool all the time, it has a 45degree bend with the maf and the filter in the fenderwell. the plastic does not get hott and the filter is out of the engine bay. made a noticable difference from the chrome cai i had before.
Click to expand...



You either mis read or mis understood my post. My setup ALWAYS had the c&l tube with the iat. I used 2 different filter/box options with the c&l tube. The first was the stock box with the tube and then the filter on the end of the tube. There was a huge difference in the temps between the 2.
 
S

southfillyboy

Member
Aug 13, 2008
38
0
6
Jun 23, 2009
#18
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #18
VEE EIGHT said:
Sounds like the K&N FIPK fits what you want. I have the kit and absolutely love it.

Whatever kit you get, stay away from those made of metal. I made the mistake of purchasing an MAC CAI (made of chrome) the first time around and I swear that I would have suffered 3rd degree burns if I had touched the thing.
Click to expand...

I had that on my car before the accident but now that I have a KB I/C kit waiting to be put on, I don't know what way to go with the CAI.
 

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Jun 25, 2009
#19
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #19
The CAI in the fenderwell could be dicey b/c they tend suck up moisture from the ground, which could cause engine knock if enough gets from the intake to the lower manifold, but yea its a fact the the temp is colder in the wheel well esecially when there is unheated fresh air constantly coming, but the engine bay vergine is user friendly and you can put a larger filter on it without any frame obstruction, but I still say the longer air has to travel the cooler it will become.
 

blkhorse

Founding Member
Oct 30, 1999
345
1
18
Jun 26, 2009
#20
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #20
one factor in detonation is the temp of the air being drawn in,esp. under boost. With the KB all tuners start pulling timing the higher the aits get(as low as 110*) there is a very big difference in the power from 90* to 130* aits. the i/c helps but the KB under no boost(bypass open) creates a lot of heat so the cooler the air the better. if rai is in a box that is forced to suck the air from the fenderwell exit, it should be fine. but just a open filter your asking for trouble(not to mention no power) with the KB
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Engine Mysterious coolant leak at back of engine
  • palerider94
  • Jan 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
162
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 19, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
591
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
B
Saying Hi
  • BriansNSane
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
271
The Welcome Wagon Dec 21, 2025
BriansNSane
B
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
567
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
244
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?