• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

finally coming back into Mustang-Land, 5.0 or 4.6

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill9000
  • Start date Start date Jun 15, 2010

Bill9000

Member
Oct 15, 2004
182
0
16
Jun 15, 2010
#1
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • #1
Hey all, been a long time off these forums, getting ready to purchase either a 95 5.0 or a 96 4.6, anyone got any suggestions as to which is better?... I'll tell my quick goals.
I want quick 0-60, and seat of the pants "haul-arse" feel. - so I will immediately rebuild the rear end with 4.10's, and do full exhaust, headers, off road midpipe, etc. - and all bolt-ons. - I need to use the car for driving (short distance) to work each day, and I want it fast... which might I have better luck with? - I am thinking I can put a good cam in a 5.0 a lot easier... but am I better off with the later technology of the 4.6, now I know it wouldnt be a PI 4.6, but is the non-PI 4.6 still better technology than a 5.0???

looking for any advice, thoughts?

thanks!!!!!
 

Twista

Active Member
May 7, 2004
510
2
29
@ the z00 in chicago
Jun 15, 2010
#2
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • #2
If you can find a good shape 5.0 get it.. otherwise get the 96. The 96 is A LOT slower it seems and upper range RPM's is useless for anything other than making noise and going nowhere.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Jun 15, 2010
#3
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • #3
your going to get a biased opinion on this forum obviously it being 94-95. The 5.0 will give you more of what you are looking for though. The non-pi head mod motors are best used for boat anchors.
 

Bill9000

Member
Oct 15, 2004
182
0
16
Jun 15, 2010
#4
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • #4
I figured it'd be biased based on where I put this post, I just figured someone who had a 5.0 would be able to tell me if I would like it... I want it to feel and be quick. - I had a 97GT Vert I put 3.73's in and full bolt ons, and it seemed good. - I just don't want to be disappointed with a 5.0 after having had that... doesn't sound like I would be disappointed?

I know this is gonna be a real dumb question but lets see if I can ask it in a non-dumb way ... but with say 4.10's, full bolt ons, intake, exhaust, etc. and maybe a cam, any rough idea on how quick a 95 5.0 might be (5-speed)???
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Jun 15, 2010
#5
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • #5
add in heads to the list and with driver mod you can have a high 12
 

MysteryMachine

Active Member
Jun 21, 2003
1,835
2
39
Parkesburg, PA
Jun 15, 2010
#6
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • #6
I've heard from a member on here with a 4.6 with a kb that it's still slow lol. That alone tells me to stay away
 

Bill9000

Member
Oct 15, 2004
182
0
16
Jun 15, 2010
#7
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • #7
how about same mods, and add a Vortech or Procharger? - (I'm really leaning towards the 5.0, just wanting to know what kinda power I can get out of it, and still be able to drive it)
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Jun 15, 2010
#8
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • #8
Bill9000 said:
how about same mods, and add a Vortech or Procharger? - (I'm really leaning towards the 5.0, just wanting to know what kinda power I can get out of it, and still be able to drive it)
Click to expand...

Whats your end goal...


The way i look at it if your looking for under 450rwhp a 5.0 is fine... it gets expensive when you get over that block breaking limit. Some people have luck others dont... There is always the 351 option...

With the 4.6 you have the teksid option...

If i were you and in the market for a mustang id start looking for a cobra... i just saw a 98 cobra sell for 5k

I prefer the 5.0 just beacuse im used to push rods... and i think its easier to make decent power (300-400hp) at a cheaper price.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Jun 15, 2010
#9
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • #9
Bill9000 said:
I know this is gonna be a real dumb question but lets see if I can ask it in a non-dumb way ... but with say 4.10's, full bolt ons, intake, exhaust, etc. and maybe a cam, any rough idea on how quick a 95 5.0 might be (5-speed)???
Click to expand...



My vert ran 14.4 stock with a cold air..


id say mid to high 13's with a decent driver
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jun 16, 2010
#10
  • Jun 16, 2010
  • #10
if i was in the market, i'd go 96-98 cobra. Strap on a blower of your choice....and have fun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
WTB: Procharger or Vortech Supercharger – 1996–1998 Mustang GT 4.6 2V – Budget $3,200
  • 96mustang.gt
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
1
Views
346
Want to Buy May 3, 2026
roblabsn95
R
R
  • Poll Poll
1987 GT convertible 5.0 & transmission (missing) to 96 4.6 4v on hand
  • rtrwrench
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
178
The Welcome Wagon Nov 1, 2024
AeroCoupe
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
361
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
907
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
L
2004 Mustang GT issues after bolt-ons added
  • Leo090
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 24, 2025
Leo090
L
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?