Finally some dyno #'s!!!

1bad04GT

New Member

Jul 6, 2004

174

0

0

Lubbock, Texas

Apr 20, 2006

#1

• Apr 20, 2006

• #1

Hey guys, i havent posted in a while but i went to Texas Speed and Performance today to get some baseline dyno pulls on the dynojet before I start modding this summer and heres what I got: 251 hp @ 4900 rpms and 295.3 tq @ 4100 rpms. Ill post up a vid and some pics when I get them from my friend. My mods are in my sig. Two other runs yielded 245.1 hp and 287.1 tq and 250 hp and 293.4 tq.

 

Crzyhrse

Active Member

Dec 23, 2004

0

2

38

Seattle, WA

Apr 20, 2006

#2

• Apr 20, 2006

• #2

Your peak HP RPM seems low. My '93 5.0's peak HP was at 4,900.

 

1bad04GT

New Member

Jul 6, 2004

174

0

0

Lubbock, Texas

Apr 20, 2006

#3

• Apr 20, 2006

• #3

yeah, i thot 4900 was a bit low also but thats what it is . sry guys, still waiting on that multimedia.

 

hotmustang331

Active Member

Apr 29, 2004

2,967

3

48

Bastrop,TX

Apr 20, 2006

#4

• Apr 20, 2006

• #4

4900 is right on....and NICE #S! Better than what mine did at that stage. (248/286 and had plenum and crappy mail tune on top of your mods)

 

sgarlic

Founding Member

Apr 21, 2001

3,085

1

56

Apr 20, 2006

#5

• Apr 20, 2006

• #5

Nice #'s. My '04 with K&N, Mac o/r h, and flows dyno'd 233hp/273tq.. guess I got a slow one.

 

1bad04GT

New Member

Jul 6, 2004

174

0

0

Lubbock, Texas

Apr 20, 2006

#6

• Apr 20, 2006

• #6

One more thing i forgot to mention is that my air/fuel was 11.5 to 1. How much powa could i get at 13 to one or whatever is right?

 

Crzyhrse

Active Member

Dec 23, 2004

0

2

38

Seattle, WA

Apr 20, 2006

#7

• Apr 20, 2006

• #7

Man, I'd get that adjusted as soon as possible. I don't know what you'll gain for any HP, but that's just too rich for N/A. If 4,900 is normal for a 2 valve mod motor, then that shoots the high revving 4.6 to pieces. On one dyno tune I dynoed at 6,000 for peak HP, and the next time at 5,750. That's high revving, even though it is a 4 valve, but still a 2 valve should be in the low 5K's I would think.

 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member

Mar 31, 2005

3,470

9

108

Atlanta, GA

Apr 20, 2006

#8

• Apr 20, 2006

• #8

r those numbers corrected? 250 with exhaust + K&N?

 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member

Jan 18, 2004

1,841

7

38

New Jersey

Apr 20, 2006

#9

• Apr 20, 2006

• #9

Dont know how you are making 20+ rwhp over the stock "guestimated" 23rwhp with just htose mods. That dyno pull was with NO tune right?

Very impressive numbers i must say. You have a strong running, GT...damn

 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member

Jan 18, 2004

1,841

7

38

New Jersey

Apr 20, 2006

#10

• Apr 20, 2006

• #10

You're making me wonder where i stand now...

 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member

Jan 18, 2004

1,841

7

38

New Jersey

Apr 20, 2006

#11

• Apr 20, 2006

• #11

1bad04GT said:

One more thing i forgot to mention is that my air/fuel was 11.5 to 1. How much powa could i get at 13 to one or whatever is right?

Click to expand...

Holy crap thats way rich. Set that down to 13.1:1 A/F @ WOT and you'll be making a little less power than you are now. But it will be better for the engine. You're gas mileage must be **** right now lol

 

1bad04GT

New Member

Jul 6, 2004

174

0

0

Lubbock, Texas

Apr 20, 2006

#12

• Apr 20, 2006

• #12

here's the pic and vid...
View attachment 475205


And the vid...


http://s29.photobucket.com/albums/c287/Subtle02gt/my car/?action=view&current=2006_0420Image0006.flv

 

1bad04GT

New Member

Jul 6, 2004

174

0

0

Lubbock, Texas

Apr 20, 2006

#13

• Apr 20, 2006

• #13

Thats right, no tune. Just stock with MIL eliminators.

 

stangGT97

New Member

Dec 22, 2004

1,299

1

0

Boston area, MA

Apr 21, 2006

#14

• Apr 21, 2006

• #14

UDTBadkarma said:

Holy crap thats way rich. Set that down to 13.1:1 A/F @ WOT and you'll be making a little less power than you are now. But it will be better for the engine. You're gas mileage must be **** right now lol

Click to expand...

correction - he will gain some power by leaning out his A/F mixture. Good numbers though!

 

ADRENLN

Active Member

Apr 16, 2003

2,342

3

49

NJ

Apr 21, 2006

#15

• Apr 21, 2006

• #15

yea thats pretty high for your mods and no tune. must be a strong car. yea a tune should give you a couple of hp.

 

Myfast

New Member

Mar 1, 2006

4

0

0

Searcy, argh-kansas

Apr 21, 2006

#16

• Apr 21, 2006

• #16

Great numbers! Id wait for a few more mods then get the tune.

 

Red35th

Member

Apr 18, 2003

609

2

19

Houston, TX

Apr 21, 2006

#17

• Apr 21, 2006

• #17

UDTBadkarma said:

Holy crap thats way rich. Set that down to 13.1:1 A/F @ WOT and you'll be making a little less power than you are now. But it will be better for the engine. You're gas mileage must be **** right now lol

Click to expand...

Open loop a/f has virtually no bearing on closed loop a/f, so if he is just driving his a/f should be almost stoich.

Great numbers, must be that "crystal" clear Lubbock air...

 

1bad04GT

New Member

Jul 6, 2004

174

0

0

Lubbock, Texas

Apr 21, 2006

#18

• Apr 21, 2006

• #18

Yeah, it was a pretty cool day and I was running 91 octane. I dunno if that helps or not but there ya go. I forgot the pic of my A/F ratio but it was at 15 to 1 until he smashed on it and then it went to 11.5 to 1 and was the same for all three pulls. Would a CAI lean me out any and would it be a good idea? Im looking at a JLT. I hope to get it before World Ford Challenge, which I will be at.

 

1low03gt

20+ Year Stangneter

May 24, 2004

708

11

38

Cold Hell,Ontario,Canada!!

Apr 21, 2006

#19

• Apr 21, 2006

• #19

1bad04GT said:

Hey guys, i havent posted in a while but i went to Texas Speed and Performance today to get some baseline dyno pulls on the dynojet before I start modding this summer and heres what I got: 251 hp @ 4900 rpms and 295.3 tq @ 4100 rpms. Ill post up a vid and some pics when I get them from my friend. My mods are in my sig. Two other runs yielded 245.1 hp and 287.1 tq and 250 hp and 293.4 tq.

Click to expand...

Nice #'s .Mine did similar when i only had the mac h pipe with cats,(use to have)cold air intake,and flowmaster 40 series,right in the same rpm range aswell.

 

sgarlic

Founding Member

Apr 21, 2001

3,085

1

56

Apr 21, 2006

#20

• Apr 21, 2006

• #20

Ahh.. I see. It's STD, not SAE.