• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Finished the scarebird conversion, a few notes.

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJCarbine
  • Start date Start date Jun 10, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Stangboy67

New Member
Aug 26, 2005
59
0
0
Lynnwood, WA
Aug 17, 2006
#41
  • Aug 17, 2006
  • #41
gsxrken said:
All wheel drum cars don't have prop valves b/c the wheel cylinders are sized differently Front and Rear, which serves the same purpose.

What I am interested in hearing more about is that both these guys seem to have had braking issues with the shuttle valve out of position... I have been led to believe that that shuttle is strictly for the light. Are you two saying it did interfere with brake fluid flow too, and that centering it (or getting a new one) imporved your braking?
Click to expand...

Yes it did affect the braking, markedly as described in the two previous posts. I couldn't get it to recenter, so I replaced it with an adjustable Proportion valve.
 
G

gsxrken

Member
Sep 12, 2005
206
1
18
Weschester County, NY
Aug 17, 2006
#42
  • Aug 17, 2006
  • #42
Thanks for the info
 
B

brianproctorla

New Member
Jan 30, 2007
50
0
0
Jan 30, 2007
#43
  • Jan 30, 2007
  • #43
Does this require you to press out the hub from the mustang and press it onto the ranger rotor or can you use the ranger rotor with it's hub?
 

Scarebird

Member
Jul 22, 2005
42
0
6
Bothell, Washington
Jan 30, 2007
#44
  • Jan 30, 2007
  • #44
brianproctorla said:
Does this require you to press out the hub from the mustang and press it onto the ranger rotor or can you use the ranger rotor with it's hub?
Click to expand...

No, the Ranger rotors are unicast, so the old stuff you just thorow in the basement....
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Jan 30, 2007
#45
  • Jan 30, 2007
  • #45
DJCarbine said:
I use stock manifolds, I am in search of headers that are made to clear the clutch linkage when I do plan to switch over to headers and a performance exhaust.
Click to expand...

I use hooker competition headers with no clearance issues with my stock mechanical clutch linkage.
 
J

jcwhite1288

New Member
May 13, 2006
38
0
0
Feb 5, 2007
#46
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #46
i am about to start my own scarebird conversion and i was wondering if you could post any pics of the how you ran the lines to the mc, blocking the dist block etc.
thanks
 
B

brianproctorla

New Member
Jan 30, 2007
50
0
0
Mar 18, 2007
#47
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #47
Scarebird Bolts

What bolts did you use to attach the scarebird brackets to the spindles?

I am doing the scarebird conversion with a upgraded dual MC.
Any additional information on how to run the lines of the MC and where to attach the PCV would be appreciated.
Thanks
 
P

phutch11

Member
Nov 14, 2005
328
2
18
Apr 18, 2010
#48
  • Apr 18, 2010
  • #48
Just to update this thread...with my results of my Scarebird conversion and the ensuing hunt for a MC that gave decent pedal travel, and pedal pressure required to stop the car.

After putting the 74 Maverick MC on my car and being grandly dissappointed...way, way too much pedal travel...I went back and did some research on the calipers used in the Scarebird kit. They are from an s10 truck, and are what is known is a "quick fill", or "rapid take up" design.

Basically, back in the 80's GM designed a caliper with specially designed seals that pull the piston further back into the caliper than a "normal" caliper. This reduces drag, and gave slightly better gas mileage.

However, it requires a specially designed master cylinder that essentially has two pistons, one larger, one smaller. When you first push on the brake pedal, the larger one first moves - pushing a large volume of brake fluid to the caliper to push the piston/pads into contact with the disc - then the smaller piston takes over and provides the pressure to really stop the car.

So, you MUST use the right MC or you will never, ever get the feel of the brakes right. I have yet to find a quick take up MC for manually brake cars. Too bad Scarebird doesn't tell you this up front.

The good news is that with a little modfication, you can make the stock s10 master cylinder work, but you will have to live with the extra pedal effort since you are using a power brake MC on a manual system.

Just trying to give everyone the heads up.

Good luck...
 

Scarebird

Member
Jul 22, 2005
42
0
6
Bothell, Washington
Apr 18, 2010
#49
  • Apr 18, 2010
  • #49
phutch11 said:
...I went back and did some research on the calipers used in the Scarebird kit. They are from an s10 truck, and are what is known is a "quick fill", or "rapid take up" design.

Basically, back in the 80's GM designed a caliper with specially designed seals that pull the piston further back into the caliper than a "normal" caliper. This reduces drag, and gave slightly better gas mileage.

However, it requires a specially designed master cylinder that essentially has two pistons, one larger, one smaller. When you first push on the brake pedal, the larger one first moves - pushing a large volume of brake fluid to the caliper to push the piston/pads into contact with the disc - then the smaller piston takes over and provides the pressure to really stop the car.

So, you MUST use the right MC or you will never, ever get the feel of the brakes right. I have yet to find a quick take up MC for manually brake cars. Too bad Scarebird doesn't tell you this up front.
Click to expand...

I do not believe that is the issue. We have used many post 1979 GM calipers with no ill effect. The amount of piston retraction is minimal: this is accomplished by the seal having been "coined" - formed with a radial twist. We have been told the amount of retraction at the caliper is about 0.020", which translates to about 0.065" master piston travel - this is a negligible amount at the pedal.
 
T

TeamEntity

New Member
May 4, 2005
130
1
0
Apr 19, 2010
#50
  • Apr 19, 2010
  • #50
so which is it? the maverick master or another unit? btw, I want a ten dollar refund not knowing that i could of gotten ten bucks off when i ordered my set for my 65 a couple of weeks ago.
 

Scarebird

Member
Jul 22, 2005
42
0
6
Bothell, Washington
Apr 19, 2010
#51
  • Apr 19, 2010
  • #51
About the discount - that was in 2006, awhile back. Beer was cheaper then.
 
T

TeamEntity

New Member
May 4, 2005
130
1
0
Apr 19, 2010
#52
  • Apr 19, 2010
  • #52
Too bad i quit drinking in 07
 
Reactions: rgsauger
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Brakes 1966 Mustang convertible 289, Auto - Disc brake conversion issues
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
543
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Mar 13, 2025
dmzenge
D
Granada Front Disc, 9” Drum Rear, 86 Bronco II MC, and Manual Brakes - Pedal Slack
  • AeroCoupe
  • Jul 8, 2023
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 14, 2023
AeroCoupe
H
1969 mustang front drum to disc conversion
  • hbstang
  • Aug 3, 2022
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Aug 4, 2022
manicmechanic007
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
12
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Today at 1:20 PM
fasterthangas
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?