• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

First time at the track not as good as I had hoped

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cannoball888
  • Start date Start date Jan 16, 2007

Cannoball888

New Member
Dec 25, 2005
320
0
0
Gainesville, FL
Jan 16, 2007
#1
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #1
With a 306 cu putting down 231RWHP my 65's best time out of six runs was this:

R/T... 0.250
60'...1.937
330...5.728
1/8...8.930
MPH...77.36
1000...11.710
1/4...14.081
MPH...95.28

That does it, I'm getting that 408 this year.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jan 16, 2007
#2
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #2
Cannoball888 said:
With a 306 cu putting down 231RWHP my 65's best time out of six runs was this:

R/T... 0.250
60'...1.937
330...5.728
1/8...8.930
MPH...77.36
1000...11.710
1/4...14.081
MPH...95.28

That does it, I'm getting that 408 this year.
Click to expand...


you have power to run low 13's. You'll be disappointed in the 408 too if you don't get the whole combination worked out.
Your RWHP and trap speed don't match up well at all, either somethings gotten out of tune or your car weighs 4000 lbs.
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Jan 16, 2007
#3
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #3
That first time at the track (or first time back) seems to always be dissappointing. Our cars are never as fast as we think they will be...... However I will tell you that you will be happy as you make minor changes that yield results....
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Jan 16, 2007
#4
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #4
Your rwhp numbers put you at around 275 fwhp? I think you should be trapping close to around 100mph. Your 60 isnt bad for street tires. Just looks like your not pulling hard up top. What trans/gearing do you have?
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Jan 16, 2007
#5
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #5
yeah, everybody always thinks they're go rip off 12 scond 1/4 times. I agree with gearing,some M/T DR's and then work on some minor tunning(carb,timing)
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 16, 2007
#6
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #6
Cannoball888 said:
With a 306 cu putting down 231RWHP my 65's best time out of six runs was this:

R/T... 0.250
60'...1.937
330...5.728
1/8...8.930
MPH...77.36
1000...11.710
1/4...14.081
MPH...95.28

That does it, I'm getting that 408 this year.
Click to expand...

your reaction time, and your 60ft are a bit slow, but acceptable for a first time effort. before you build that 408, get this combination dialed in first, as well as get used to driving the car. start by working on your reaction time, get it down to .125, and then get your 60ft time down to 1.85. once that is accomplished, you will be on your way to the mid 13's at over 100mph.
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Jan 16, 2007
#7
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #7
I love posting this one:



This demonstrates the learning curve from the first time I ever took the 65 (and myself) to the track. Learning to drive the car, figuring out little things like the car wasn't holding 2nd gear, learning launch RPMs, changing air pressure, how much burn out to do, etc.
 

Attachments

  • times.webp
    31.5 KB · Views: 107

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Jan 16, 2007
#8
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #8
I have a spreadsheet that I built that shows almost every pass I ever made in the car from 03' to the last time I raced it on slicks in 05'. My spreadsheet documents the major changes I made from a carb change, to open headers, to Vic Jr intake to another carb change.....

1st pass ever was a 12.53 @ 106MPH

Last pass was in 05 at WFC8 - 11.28 @ 119MPH

This just goes to show you that little tweaks and some wheel time can net some significant gains. I made this progress with the same motor with minor changes(same gears (3:70's), same stall, and the same Cam, same heads etc)

My next pass will be in March with;

new gears - 4:11's
new stall - 4000 stall
new Cam
New Shocks (rear)
and another new carb (I got it right this time)
maybe new 6 cyl springs (if I get it done)


The spradsheet will continue....... until I get a new motor, then I will start a new spreadsheet.
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Jan 17, 2007
#9
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #9
rbohm said:
start by working on your reaction time, get it down to .125, and then get your 60ft time down to 1.85. once that is accomplished, you will be on your way to the mid 13's at over 100mph.
Click to expand...

your reaction time has NOTHING to do with your et.

your 60ft, et, and mph seems to be inline with each other, so there doesn't seem to be a glaring problems. what rpm are your shifting at? what rpm do you cross the line at?
 

67Dylan

New Member
May 11, 2006
259
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Jan 17, 2007
#10
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #10
rbohm said:
your reaction time, and your 60ft are a bit slow, but acceptable for a first time effort. before you build that 408, get this combination dialed in first, as well as get used to driving the car. start by working on your reaction time, get it down to .125, and then get your 60ft time down to 1.85. once that is accomplished, you will be on your way to the mid 13's at over 100mph.
Click to expand...

No offense meant, but RT has **** to do w/ET. Once he trips the light the time starts... he could have a 5sec RT and it won't effect his ET.



IMO, if you had street tires then a 1.9 60' is great and you could get a little more out of it, but sticky tires would be better. If you're using sticky tires then a little improvement is there.

Are you having problems w/shifting? Granny shifting, speed shifting, or driving it normal? If you had the car dyno'd and tuned it then, depending on weather conditions you'll see a 13.5 @ ~97mph w/seat time. Did you have it dyno tuned? If not, then tune as you go. Good advice about tracking changes made to the car, add weather conditions to your list to help tune accordingly.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 17, 2007
#11
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #11
forgive an old crew chief when he says to work on ones reaction times. yes i know that rt's dont mean anything when it comes to 1/4 mile times, but it makes the driver concentrate, which helps overall.
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Jan 17, 2007
#12
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #12
rbohm said:
forgive an old crew chief when he says to work on ones reaction times. yes i know that rt's dont mean anything when it comes to 1/4 mile times, but it makes the driver concentrate, which helps overall.
Click to expand...

You are hereby forgiven, but good point, RT's helps you to win and that's why I go......

ET's are a great way to measure your cars potential but as a bracket racer when it comes down to the money (in your pocket) you better be consistant and cut a good light. Nothing is better than putting the faster guys on the trailer all day long because your cutting near perfect lights....

I've been taken out many times by 14 second cars because I get anxious at the tree watching them head on down the track. I would much rather race a quicker car....

OK - hold the flames, I know I am off topic..... but I am itching to get back to the track after a year off, i just can't stand it..

Cannonball - Spray that 306 if your not happy.
 

67Dylan

New Member
May 11, 2006
259
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Jan 17, 2007
#13
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #13
rbohm said:
forgive an old crew chief when he says to work on ones reaction times. yes i know that rt's dont mean anything when it comes to 1/4 mile times, but it makes the driver concentrate, which helps overall.
Click to expand...


I thought you prolly knew that I agree w/you too; working on the RT will help win races. Like racing itself, seat time will be benificial.
 

ga289stocker

Member
May 23, 2006
238
0
16
Sugar Hill, Ga
Jan 17, 2007
#14
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #14
I think his 60' is good for street tires, heck I'm still learning to lauch w/ the small bfg's 215/60/14 dr's and have a best of only 2.0x. I ran my 289 to a best 13.84 @100.65. I think w/ that trap speed of 95 your et is pretty good, I've seen many guys in the high 14's w/ the same of faster mph but bad 60' times. Like has been said 1st time out is never what you hope it will be. Mine wasn't but w/ little adjustments your times will go down. My biggest improvement was just supsension set on my 65. Rancho's out back, CE 90/10's in front, clamped leaf springs and seat time I picked up 9/10's on my second outting.
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Jan 17, 2007
#15
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #15
ga289stocker said:
CE 90/10's in front.
Click to expand...

What coil springs are you running? 620's? Do you like the Competition Engineering 90/10's? I'm debating wether to change my shocks and keep the 620's on or go ahead and change to the 6 cyl springs I bought and change shocks. I just put the Rancho's out back but haven't drove the car since....
 

ga289stocker

Member
May 23, 2006
238
0
16
Sugar Hill, Ga
Jan 17, 2007
#16
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #16
washMO66 said:
What coil springs are you running? 620's? Do you like the Competition Engineering 90/10's? I'm debating wether to change my shocks and keep the 620's on or go ahead and change to the 6 cyl springs I bought and change shocks. I just put the Rancho's out back but haven't drove the car since....
Click to expand...

Believe it or not I'm still using the 40+ yr old v8 springs that came w/ car. It actually works well cause the springs are soft from wear and w/ the CE 90/10's man the front end comes up quick on launches, It's not bottoming out the shock
or anything as it's not close to even pulling the tires off the ground, it is greatly improved over the kyb's i had in there.
 

Bonzo

New Member
Aug 22, 2003
8
0
0
Wales
Jan 20, 2007
#17
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #17
clamped leaf springs and seat time I picked up 9/10's on my second outting.[/QUOTE]

Looked on your site for the Leaf Spring Clamps. Couple of questions.

# How many did you fit per side.
# What improvement did you get.
# How much did it lower the car. Lots of speed bumps around here ( Sorry three questions)

Really like the car.
Thanks Tony
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Jan 20, 2007
#18
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #18
I need some gears in my car (now have 2.80's) cause stalling up to 2500 and running 255 BFG DR's, my 60ft is in the 2.10 range. It'll still run 14.00's all day long though. Great bracket car.

Keep up the work and give us more info on your combo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
1/4 Help Please
  • jon94vert
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2016
mikestang63
  • Sticky
Resource Discussion Post Your S550 Track Times Here
  • 15GTrob
  • Jan 8, 2016
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
14K
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Jun 8, 2021
Renegade Stang
R
First Time Out With Drag Car...results Inside
  • Bullitt347
  • Sep 14, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 24, 2015
mikestang63
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
  • Locked
SOLD 94 Mustang Gt - 306ci, 325rwhp/341rwtq, Afr/fti/edelbrock, 44k Mi
  • GTJake
  • Nov 20, 2016
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
2
Views
4K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jan 5, 2017
mustang90
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?