• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Flowmaster vs. MagnaFlow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sentipede
  • Start date Start date Feb 11, 2007
S

sentipede

New Member
Dec 27, 2004
57
0
0
Feb 11, 2007
#1
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #1
I have a 289 A code with Tri-Y headers. My question is which one of these systems would work best on my car (1965 fastback)?

Flowmaster - $327 with "EBAYROCKS" code:
http://www.performancepeddler.com/detail.asp?PRODUCT_ID=FLO17273

MagnaFlow X Exhaust System for $349 with "EBAYROCKS" code:
http://www.performancepeddler.com/detail.asp?PRODUCT_ID=MAG15815

Thanks in advance...
 

Shakin66

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2001
628
1
19
Waycross, Ga / Lake James, NC
Feb 11, 2007
#2
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #2
I did a lot of research before I ordered my Magnaflow kit for my 66 and I have been very pleased with the quality of the kit from the look of it to the sound which is not loud until you really get into it. There has been absolutely no drone either which is something you need to be aware of when dealing with flowmaster kits.
 

ga289stocker

Member
May 23, 2006
238
0
16
Sugar Hill, Ga
Feb 11, 2007
#3
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #3
I second the magnflow kit, I was going to by the flow's but when my local muffler guy put both of them in my hand and I could see straight through the magnaflow and just baffles on the flow, he asked which do you think would flow better. I have to say I'm very pleased w/ the Magnaflows and as mentioned no drone and is nice for crusing but really go alive when you hit it...I have a few video clips on my site you can get a pretty good idea of the sound. I have a 289 w/ tri-y's into 2.5" tubing w/ an X pipe..my .02
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 11, 2007
#4
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #4
hey question, do you know if this code is good for a 67 kit also?
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Feb 11, 2007
#5
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #5
FWIW, i will almost guarantee you can get the best deal on magnaflow from stangnet. check out MRaburns signature...

http://forums.stangnet.com/member.php?u=4674
 

spirockp

5 Year Member
Mar 26, 2004
465
12
39
NJ
Feb 12, 2007
#6
  • Feb 12, 2007
  • #6
Sentipede, let me know when you get your's installed. I ordered mine a few weeks ago and just haven't had the time to get them installed. As soon as I do I post my findings.
 

1965stangcoupe

New Member
Sep 7, 2006
82
0
0
Mount Vernon Washington
Feb 13, 2007
#7
  • Feb 13, 2007
  • #7
WantaGT said:
hey question, do you know if this code is good for a 67 kit also?
Click to expand...

Yes it is! I think it is for anything on the web site. I t just asks for the code after its in your cart you can type it in and see the savings! and if you post a link to a forum where you have given the code they give you ten more bucks off! sweet deal. Before I get mine though I am gonna check out what "MRaburns" has to offer. I wont be getting exhaust anytime soon so don't count on me for info on how it sounds or anything. I am waiting to here your guys responces. But I am pretty set on magnaflows system. my friend has flowmasters on his 94 cobra and they are a little to loud for me.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Feb 14, 2007
#8
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #8
Magnaflow...hands down....without a doubt. Quality is better and has a million mile warranty.

PM ME if you want a better price than $349
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 14, 2007
#9
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #9
I have a flow kit now and if i had it to do over again I would get the magnaflow kit. I don't think the magnaflow was available when I got my flowmasters. Im going to a roller 302 based motor now so i will sound like most fox bodies on the road.
 

spirockp

5 Year Member
Mar 26, 2004
465
12
39
NJ
Feb 20, 2007
#10
  • Feb 20, 2007
  • #10
Had my Magnaflows installed yesterday. (Professionally)

First off the quality was perfect, but I was a little dissapionted on the sound. The 302 motor in my Mustang came out of my 32 Roadster which has Flowmasters on it and I think it sounded much better running with the flowmasters. I went with the Magnaflow's because they made a direct replacement and Flowmaster's did not.

Again very happy with the quality and dissapointed with the sound.

Just my .02
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Feb 20, 2007
#11
  • Feb 20, 2007
  • #11
In my worthless opinion, flowmasters seem to sound better on stock or mild builds, and magnaflows really start to shine on higher performance engines. But then again, sound is subjective and everyone has their own opinion of what sounds right.
 
P

palerider94

Member
Feb 21, 2006
573
1
19
Feb 20, 2007
#12
  • Feb 20, 2007
  • #12
I've got the magnaflows for my 302. 600 Holley, Performer intake, hooker comps. When I first put them on I thought they were too quiet. I even replaced the turn down tips with straight tips to see if a little louder. But it seemed it go a little louder after a couple hundred miles. I think they are about just right now especially with over 50 driving (btw wife thinks they are too loud).
 

my70stang

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
156
0
0
Arizona
Feb 28, 2007
#13
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #13
hey guys, im thinking about getting the magnaflows for my 70, but im not too sure what kind of headers i should get that will work best, should i just get shorty's, or tri-y's?

plus, how much re-manufacturing, if any, was done to the tubes to make them fit?
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Mar 1, 2007
#14
  • Mar 1, 2007
  • #14
I know this is straying a bit from the original question (which I cannot answer) but the 3" Magnaflows might as well be open headers when I stomp on my 408. It's much louder than I expected. I've been thinking about swapping it out for the 2.5" kit to make it quieter.
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Mar 1, 2007
#15
  • Mar 1, 2007
  • #15
I got the flowmaster american thunder kit with 'delta-flow' 40's. It was cool back in highschool. I think 302 is right. I'll probably swap some magnaflows in there before I go off to school.
 
B

BB1966

New Member
Dec 1, 2004
297
1
0
Beaufort , NC USA!!!!
Mar 1, 2007
#16
  • Mar 1, 2007
  • #16
I like the sound of both systems but I went with Magnaflow because it is Stainless and it looks great.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Exhaust for 408w stroker
  • SadbutTrue
  • Sep 10, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
139
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 10, 2026
nickyb
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
457
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
G
Scott Drake Tri-Y Header Ceramic Pair
  • GotMojo
  • Nov 30, 2023
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Dec 1, 2023
GotMojo
G
Z
Engine New head for ‘88 mass air converted foxbody
  • zahirayunus
  • Dec 13, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
245
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2024
zahirayunus
Z
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?