• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Ford Racing C Springs or Eibach Pro-Kit

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcmmotorsports
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2004

mcmmotorsports

Member
Apr 12, 2004
689
0
17
Danbury, CT
Aug 31, 2004
#1
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #1
It is decision time and I need some help. I am choosing between the Ford C Springs and the Eibach Pro-Kit but don't know which one.

I have seen and rode in a car with the Eibachs and like it very much. BUT, if I can get the same ride and appearance out of a set of CUT C springs, I would be interested in the savings of $120+.
Again, I said CUT "C" springs because I know the drop isn't as aggressive with them stock and have read here or elsewhere that they are designed to be cut.
So, I am looking for about a 1.5" drop and a slightly firmer ride quality than what I have right now. I know you get what you pay for and I am sooo very close to just spring for the Eibach's (no pun intended) and enjoy or take a chance at $109 Ford Springs and HOPE I like them.
Opinions please:
 

04DarkShadowGT

Member
Jan 31, 2004
474
0
17
Fort Wayne, IN
Aug 31, 2004
#2
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #2
The ride is definatly firmer with the C springs. Its not uncomfortable but it is rougher.

I have heard the C springs are designed with a dead coil that can be cut and not effect performance.

They are definatly worth the $$ for the C springs.
 

mcmmotorsports

Member
Apr 12, 2004
689
0
17
Danbury, CT
Aug 31, 2004
#3
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #3
Would a car handle better with the cut "C"'s over the Eibachs?
 
T

Tunez4523

New Member
May 26, 2004
36
0
0
Concord, NC
Aug 31, 2004
#4
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #4
I'd be very interested in that answer as well. My debate has been between the Eibach Pro's, Ford C's, the BBK's, and Steeda Sport springs. My biggest concern is that I do no want to cut anything. It would seem that if it is a truly dead coil, then why even have it there at all?
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Aug 31, 2004
#5
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #5
I'd think the ride on cut C's would be like azz, since, to begin with, these are not progressive. Cutting 'em would make it worse. Just my thoughts...
 

04DarkShadowGT

Member
Jan 31, 2004
474
0
17
Fort Wayne, IN
Aug 31, 2004
#6
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #6
The reason they have the "dead" coil is so people can have the option of how low they wanna go. For me I drive my car in the winter, not to mention my driveway curb is cuttin it close with the chin spoiler and 1" drop. 2" and I would be in trouble.

There were actually instructions included with the C springs to tell you where to cut the springs at.

The C will be rougher than the steedas I would imagine as they have a linear rate like two said, but linear rate springs tend to be a better handling spring than progressive.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Aug 31, 2004
#7
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #7
Between the C springs and the Eibach Pro Kit I bought the Eibachs. I only paid $60 more (shipped to my door) than the C springs would've cost so I was happy. The extra drop is worth it.

Ride and performance wise, I have no idea. My roomate got the C springs, it doesn't look like it dropped at all.
 

mcmmotorsports

Member
Apr 12, 2004
689
0
17
Danbury, CT
Sep 1, 2004
#8
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #8
JonJon said:
My roomate got the C springs, it doesn't look like it dropped at all.
Click to expand...
He probably didn't cut them at all then.
 

DJsZincGT

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
1,141
0
36
WV
Sep 1, 2004
#9
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #9
mcmmotorsports said:
He probably didn't cut them at all then.
Click to expand...

I have the "C" springs and love them. I wanted a little more than the 1" drop but I didn't want to cut the springs. What I did was remove the spring isolators and went to Lowes and bought a thin walled rubber hose and put back in place of the spring isolator. Once the car settled I had about a 1.25"-1.5" drop in the front. I put the Eibach Pro Kit under my girlfriends V6 and I like them too, but the car sits a little too low. It drags on everything now that the springs have settled. Replacing the isolators on the "C" springs put me in the middle and I love it.
 

04DarkShadowGT

Member
Jan 31, 2004
474
0
17
Fort Wayne, IN
Sep 1, 2004
#10
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #10
I didnt cut mine and there is definatly a difference. I got probably an inch all around. Definatly not as noticeable as some other springs but I could tell right away.
 

madmatt

Ellis Juan sympathizer
Founding Member
Dec 28, 2002
465
0
16
Lexington, SC
Sep 1, 2004
#11
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #11
04Dark, your car looks great with that drop and I think youve just decided which one I want. It looks perfect, dont have to worry about the bumps and scrapes and everything else like C/C plates.
 

04DarkShadowGT

Member
Jan 31, 2004
474
0
17
Fort Wayne, IN
Sep 1, 2004
#12
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #12
with C Springs
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Sep 1, 2004
#13
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #13
mcmmotorsports said:
He probably didn't cut them at all then.
Click to expand...
Of course he didn't...
 
Reactions: Essn95

john_324

New Member
Jan 14, 2003
446
1
0
Washington, D.C.
Sep 1, 2004
#14
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #14
Do the FRPP springs have a dead coil on the front and back springs? I know the rear ones have one that you can cut if you don't like the "raked" look...but do the fronts too?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
870
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
161
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 8:05 PM
AeroCoupe
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
890
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
614
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?