• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

fox confusion help...

  • Thread starter Thread starter greyfox69
  • Start date Start date Nov 3, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

greyfox69

Member
Oct 26, 2011
56
0
6
kentucky
Nov 3, 2011
#1
  • Nov 3, 2011
  • #1
Im a bit confused trying to figure out my new fox. I just bought the car and according to all I can find from researching the vin number identification the car is a 1988 lx convertible. on the title it says body type: cn, model description: mlx. Under the hood engine says 5.0 ho. Did the lx come with a 5.0 in 88? or is this possibly a 5.0 engine they dropped in at a later date? vin number reads 1fabp44axjf.
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Nov 3, 2011
#2
  • Nov 3, 2011
  • #2
Yes, the LX was available with either a four cylinder or an eight. HOWEVER, your car has been converted. If it was an original V8 car, that second A would be an E.
 

greyfox69

Member
Oct 26, 2011
56
0
6
kentucky
Nov 4, 2011
#3
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #3
ok now my second question is this...how do i figure out if PO stayed with speed density or a MAF? THe intake that is on mine is crap so I cant go from that. PO stated that the car's bbk intake was stolen so he put this piece of crap intake on there...see pic Forgive the noob questions View attachment 166264
 

ID89GT

10 Year Member
May 26, 2008
1,659
18
49
Spokane Valley, WA
Nov 4, 2011
#4
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #4
Look at the computer. Its in the passenger kick panel
 

greyfox69

Member
Oct 26, 2011
56
0
6
kentucky
Nov 4, 2011
#5
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #5
ill do that first thing in the morning when I have light to see. then I will post further info here as to figure it out.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Nov 4, 2011
#6
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #6
Looks like speed density to me. I don't see a MAF anywhere between the throttle body and air filter.
 

greyfox69

Member
Oct 26, 2011
56
0
6
kentucky
Nov 4, 2011
#7
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #7
if its a speed density chances are its an 88 engine in the car yes? I had that hideous intake off earlier today looking at throttle body and didnt see anything there its just bolted on. so i was guessing speed density but wanted to make sure. Workin on getting my hands on a stock tube and airbox. If anyone out there has one please pm me.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Nov 4, 2011
#8
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #8
It doesn't necessarily mean it's an 88 engine in the car, it just means that the owner did not want to 1) buy a more expensive A9L computer and/or 2) wire the mass air meter into the harness.
 

greyfox69

Member
Oct 26, 2011
56
0
6
kentucky
Nov 4, 2011
#9
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #9
I thought all mustang foxbody went to maf in 89 with exception of California 88 cars which were maf.??
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Nov 4, 2011
#10
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #10
greyfox69 said:
I thought all mustang foxbody went to maf in 89 with exception of California 88 cars which were maf.??
Click to expand...

That is correct.

You can put a 302 out of a 71 Mustang and run a MAF setup if you want.
 

greyfox69

Member
Oct 26, 2011
56
0
6
kentucky
Nov 4, 2011
#11
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #11
LarsD said:
That is correct.

thanks. I thought that was the case.

You can put a 302 out of a 71 Mustang and run a MAF setup if you want.
Click to expand...

true. Im gonna check the computer today and see if he did do a conversion and the meter was stolen with the intake? Id like to slap this dude right about now.
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Nov 4, 2011
#12
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #12
greyfox69 said:
true. Im gonna check the computer today and see if he did do a conversion and the meter was stolen with the intake? Id like to slap this dude right about now.
Click to expand...

It's possible. I've seen some incredibly hacked together things over the years (on cars I have bought unfortunately).
 

greyfox69

Member
Oct 26, 2011
56
0
6
kentucky
Nov 4, 2011
#13
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #13
LarsD said:
It's possible. I've seen some incredibly hacked together things over the years (on cars I have bought unfortunately).
Click to expand...

Im having trouble getting the push pen to release to get the kick panel off. It will come almost all the way out but seems to be getting stuck ? Im kind of afraid to just yank it out as to not break it. UGHH. I also tried to find any kind of numbers stamped on the engine but with no luck.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,166
17,860
224
Massachusetts
Nov 4, 2011
#14
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #14
Honestly...it makes sense. He didn't hack it.

1988 Mustangs are compatible in terms of wiring with only 1987-1989 Mustangs. For a 4-banger, the body harness is the same, but the engine harness is not. So that means he needed to change the engine harness.

The only compatible years of engine harness would be 1987, 1988 and 1989. Now, only 1 year was mass air, 1989 (unless you get an 1988 CA car) so odds are a speed density 1987-1988 engine harness was more readily available since 1989 harness go for BIG $$$ since they are the only factory OEM harness for Mass Air that swaps into an 1986-1988 speed density Mustang.

So, i bet you have an 87-88 engine harness, a speed density computer and an engine that coule come from any 87-93 Mustang.

Again, not necessarily a poor hack job...but the logical thing the original owner may have done.
 

greyfox69

Member
Oct 26, 2011
56
0
6
kentucky
Nov 4, 2011
#15
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #15
Mustang5L5 said:
Honestly...it makes sense. He didn't hack it.

1988 Mustangs are compatible in terms of wiring with only 1987-1989 Mustangs. For a 4-banger, the body harness is the same, but the engine harness is not. So that means he needed to change the engine harness.

The only compatible years of engine harness would be 1987, 1988 and 1989. Now, only 1 year was mass air, 1989 (unless you get an 1988 CA car) so odds are a speed density 1987-1988 engine harness was more readily available since 1989 harness go for BIG $$$ since they are the only factory OEM harness for Mass Air that swaps into an 1986-1988 speed density Mustang.

So, i bet you have an 87-88 engine harness, a speed density computer and an engine that coule come from any 87-93 Mustang.

Again, not necessarily a poor hack job...but the logical thing the original owner may have done.
Click to expand...

I was out snoopin around the engine trying to find the stamp on it. Was not successful at finding the stamp but I did find a sticker on the passenger side of the engine. sticker was c 9j310AA then at top right corner of sticker was a f10 and below on right bottom corner was CA. so possibly mean that is a California engine??
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,166
17,860
224
Massachusetts
Nov 4, 2011
#16
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #16
Wouldn't matter. the engine has nothing to do with the computer system running it. Could be a 1986 engine, or a 1993 engine..would run the same.


Biggest clue is the black power steering reseviour....suggesting it's a 90-93 engine. But parts can be changed.

I'd be more concerned with asking "is this a high output engine"? What's the firing order?
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Nov 4, 2011
#17
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #17
Mustang5L5 said:
Biggest clue is the black power steering reseviour....suggesting it's a 90-93 engine. But parts can be changed.
Click to expand...


:Word: All three of my 93's have yellow/beige reservoirs.
 

greyfox69

Member
Oct 26, 2011
56
0
6
kentucky
Nov 4, 2011
#18
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #18
i will check firing tomorrow. supposedly this thing has an e cam in it. but who knows.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Nov 4, 2011
#19
  • Nov 4, 2011
  • #19
This doesn’t prove that the block is a HO block. Some trucks evidently use a HO firing order
with a low lift cam. However, it will definitely prove that a block can’t be HO because the firing order is wrong.


Remove the #1 & #3 spark plugs. Put your finger in #1 spark plug hole. Crank the engine over until you feel compression on #1 cylinder. Slowly turn the engine until the TDC mark and the timing pointer line up. Mark TDC on the balancer with chalk or paint. Put your finger in #3 spark plug hole and crank the engine 90 degrees. You should feel pressure trying to blow past your finger. If you do not feel pressure, repeat the process again. If you feel pressure, it is a HO engine.

No pressure the second time, remove spark plug #5. Put your finger in #1 spark plug hole. Crank the engine over until you feel compression on #1 cylinder. Put your finger in #5 spark plug hole and crank the engine 90 degrees. If you feel pressure now, the engine is not a HO model, no matter what it says on the engine.

Using a small carpenter or machinist square to mark the harmonic balancer off into 90 degree sections may be helpful here.

A 15/16 deep socket & breaker bar or ratchet may be used to turn the engine.

The HO firing order is 1-3-7-2-6-5-4-8.
Non HO firing order is 1-5-4-2-6-3-7-8
 

greyfox69

Member
Oct 26, 2011
56
0
6
kentucky
Nov 5, 2011
#20
  • Nov 5, 2011
  • #20
Ok I did check to see where the spark plug wires are going. but as far as doing what jrichker suggested..that is a bit past my mechanical knowledge for I am a complete noob coming into this. 1-3-7-2-6-5-4-8
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Brakes 88 LX 5.0 - help! no brakes
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
390
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2025
nickyb
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
567
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
259
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
330
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?