• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Fox Horsepower

  • Thread starter Thread starter mpeach1976
  • Start date Start date Oct 20, 2016
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,996
10,624
213
polk county florida
Oct 23, 2016
#21
  • Oct 23, 2016
  • #21
May not be an 86 engine, I looked in the spark plug holes when I bought it and it has the eyebrows on the piston tops, I learned to look for those before, I was told that they thought it was an 86 motor but it sat under the bench wraped up for years so memory may be fuzzy. I'm putting it on a lift soon to do some maintenance and insection so I will look for a date code then. I need to pull the intake and the timing cover to fix leaks, thats why I asked about the cam, just one more step to change it although I'm pretty satisfied with the stocker, what about 1.7's on a stock cam? I like sneeky hp, hard to hide a blower.
 
Reactions: 5.0specialist

5.0specialist

Active Member
Jul 10, 2016
141
53
48
venice fl
Oct 23, 2016
#22
  • Oct 23, 2016
  • #22
karthief said:
May not be an 86 engine, I looked in the spark plug holes when I bought it and it has the eyebrows on the piston tops, I learned to look for those before, I was told that they thought it was an 86 motor but it sat under the bench wraped up for years so memory may be fuzzy. I'm putting it on a lift soon to do some maintenance and insection so I will look for a date code then. I need to pull the intake and the timing cover to fix leaks, thats why I asked about the cam, just one more step to change it although I'm pretty satisfied with the stocker, what about 1.7's on a stock cam? I like sneeky hp, hard to hide a blower.
Click to expand...

If it has the 4 eye brows on the top of the pistons, then you should have no problems. If you are running a stock ford head, I'd recommend running dual ratio rockers. 1.6's or 1.65 (scorpion brand) on the intake valves and 1.7's or 1.72's (scorpion brand) on the exhaust. These ford small engines respond more to this combo than to 1.7's across the board. This is because the exhaust ports flow a lot less than the intake ports, so it creates more of a balance between the two. For the next combustion cycle, you will have more fresh air/fuel mixture, and less residual burned mixture (exhaust) hanging around.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,996
10,624
213
polk county florida
Oct 23, 2016
#23
  • Oct 23, 2016
  • #23
Thanks I will keep that in mind. I like to be sneeky.
 
Reactions: 5.0specialist

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,448
1,532
194
Maryland
Oct 23, 2016
#24
  • Oct 23, 2016
  • #24
I like the stock cam in my 92. Threw some 1.7 full roller rockers on for some more lift and top it off with 10psi boost.

Dont need a radical attitude to and git..... Life is good!
 
Reactions: 90sickfox and General karthief

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,946
5,818
213
Oct 23, 2016
#25
  • Oct 23, 2016
  • #25
There was a write up in one of the magazines about making power with a ford 5.0. They actually made more power with stock can and 1.7 rockers on exhaust and 1.6 on intake. For some reason 1.7 hurt a couple horsepower when on intake and exhaust.

Ford always restricted exhaust flow. You'd be surprised what a little more lift and some porting will do on the exhaust side of a 302.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,996
10,624
213
polk county florida
Oct 23, 2016
#26
  • Oct 23, 2016
  • #26
I remember that too. Who'd a thought that would work. I've read some of the stuff they do to engines that run that FAST (factory appearing stock something or another) drag class. Neet stuff.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
758
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
290
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
S
Another no start thread.. pls help
  • Sarah84eyedfox
  • Apr 3, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
418
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2025
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?