fox vs sn95 5.0 motor question

Green4.6GT

Size Matters

Founding Member

Dec 31, 2001

2,910

0

0

Regina, Sask, Canada

May 11, 2008

#1

• May 11, 2008

• #1

getting the motor done for my fox roller..

the question i have is this.

the donor motor was out of a 95 5.0 im going carb so any diffrences with the intake are not going to matter, and i have a bellhousing and t5 from a fox so im all set on that end..

now, with that said, am i going to run into any problems with the front accessories (no ac) when putting this into the car, or should everything fit ok

 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman

Dec 26, 2006

0

10

49

Thomasville, ga

May 11, 2008

#2

• May 11, 2008

• #2

its all the same

 

Green4.6GT

Size Matters

Founding Member

Dec 31, 2001

2,910

0

0

Regina, Sask, Canada

May 11, 2008

#3

• May 11, 2008

• #3

 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run

15 Year Member

Nov 29, 1999

3,133

18

108

Chicagoland

May 11, 2008

#4

• May 11, 2008

• #4

The only difference I know of between the short blocks is that 94-95 used hypereutectic pistons, whereas 87-92 used forged. The 93 Mustangs were also treated to the hypereutectics.

 

Green4.6GT

Size Matters

Founding Member

Dec 31, 2001

2,910

0

0

Regina, Sask, Canada

May 11, 2008

#5

• May 11, 2008

• #5

StangGT1995 said:

The only difference I know of between the short blocks is that 94-95 used hypereutectic pistons, whereas 87-92 used forged. The 93 Mustangs were also treated to the hypereutectics.

Click to expand...

im just worried about any interference issues with the accessories etc. i have everything else all set

 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician

Aug 8, 2003

8,023

1,615

194

NJ

May 11, 2008

#6

• May 11, 2008

• #6

I'm pretty sure you need the entire accessory setup from the fox.
The 95 stuff is not the same.

 

Green4.6GT

Size Matters

Founding Member

Dec 31, 2001

2,910

0

0

Regina, Sask, Canada

May 11, 2008

#7

• May 11, 2008

• #7

if you have the entire 95 setup it should work fine, no?

 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman

Dec 26, 2006

0

10

49

Thomasville, ga

May 11, 2008

#8

• May 11, 2008

• #8

Green4.6GT said:

if you have the entire 95 setup it should work fine, no?

Click to expand...

YES now go back to the bananna dance

 

Green4.6GT

Size Matters

Founding Member

Dec 31, 2001

2,910

0

0

Regina, Sask, Canada

May 11, 2008

#9

• May 11, 2008

• #9

BK_CAULEY said:

YES now go back to the bananna dance

Click to expand...

 

Green4.6GT

Size Matters

Founding Member

Dec 31, 2001

2,910

0

0

Regina, Sask, Canada

May 11, 2008

#10

• May 11, 2008

• #10

just ordered a march bracket kit.. problem solved

 

Toddstang LX

New Member

May 7, 2008

13

0

0

Pensacola

May 12, 2008

#11

• May 12, 2008

• #11

StangGT1995 said:

The only difference I know of between the short blocks is that 94-95 used hypereutectic pistons, whereas 87-92 used forged. The 93 Mustangs were also treated to the hypereutectics.

Click to expand...

Where did you read this? I thought my 92 had hypereutectic pistons... If what you said is true...then I have forged??

I can feel a bananna dance coming on.....

 

9

95GTAODE

New Member

Nov 25, 2004

200

2

0

May 12, 2008

#12

• May 12, 2008

• #12

The changeover was made late in the '92 model run, so a fair amount of '92's were built with Hyper pistons.