• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

From 4.6 to 5.0????

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omars96GT
  • Start date Start date Jan 18, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 18, 2009
#21
  • Jan 18, 2009
  • #21
Razinhell said:
mmmm. a nice 5.4L from a F150 would be fun, but probably too much work. I remember seeing a build up in one of the Mustang Magazines. They didn't get awesome numbers, but they were still better then stock.
Click to expand...

It would make great torque, but in N/A form, the horsepower wouldn't be all that spectacular. You really need forced induction and/or deep breathing to make horsepower with that engine. Also, he'd have to save up for a set of addapter plates for the 4.6L intake, unless he wanted to stick with the truck intake...in which case he'd need to save up for an aftermarket hood instead.

Then of course he'd also be adding weight to the front end.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,932
224
Massachusetts
Jan 19, 2009
#22
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #22
Unless you have a 400HP+ 331 stroker sitting around already built, forget about a 5.0 swap. The cost of just swapping in a stock 200HP 5.0L engine will exceed what it would take for you to build a nice 4.6L.

Swap on some worked heads, aftermarket cams, PI intake, plenum and TB and do exhaust and you could have a nice SOHC right there. Then just add a blower.

5.0's are nice engines, but by today's standards, they blow ass. It takes a decent set of heads and cam just to get them up to what the new 4.6's are putting out. That's why i said unless you have a built 5.0 sitting around already...and by built i mean a stroker with AL heads and aftermarket everything on it, stick with your 4.6L

If i come across a good deal for a DOHC engine, i'm taking the 5.0 out of my Mustang and going modular.

Oh and 150 shot on a 5.0 is a lot. If it's a stock lower end it will go boom eventually.
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
Jan 19, 2009
#23
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #23
A friend of mine did it. Only because he bought his 2001 with a bad motor. He sold the motor and tranny and used that towards a 94-95 5.0 donor car. He took what he needed from that and it was all a direct bolt in into his 2001 then sold the donor car. That would be the only way I would do it. I think all total he came in pretty cheap and he runs pretty decent at the track. Of course, he did some mods to get it running that well.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Jan 19, 2009
#24
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #24
Just build your motor. Get some LTs, U/D pullies, 78mmBBK intake/plenum, HiTech Stage II cams, 4.10 gears and a 93 oct tune. You should then be well over 300rwhp.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jan 19, 2009
#25
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #25
5.4's unless they are in 3v or 4v form with an aftermarket intake are no good.

now when the trick flow heads are out it will change that. but it adds 1500.00+.
 
H

harrisonfiveo

Member
Dec 18, 2005
0
0
16
Jan 19, 2009
#26
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #26
Gearbanger 101 said:
It would make great torque, but in N/A form, the horsepower wouldn't be all that spectacular. You really need forced induction and/or deep breathing to make horsepower with that engine. Also, he'd have to save up for a set of addapter plates for the 4.6L intake, unless he wanted to stick with the truck intake...in which case he'd need to save up for an aftermarket hood instead.

Then of course he'd also be adding weight to the front end.
Click to expand...

Didnt they have a rediculous cowl hood on it and still had to cut the top out to clear the intake manifold

If its the same article i read...I beleive they yanked the engine out of a lightning and put it in a sn95

May had to of cut a hole in the hood to clear the supercharger on that lightning engine...hell i dont know. Car had crazy power tho
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 19, 2009
#27
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #27
Yeah...that was a lightning engine in a Fox (Project Frightening) with the 5" cowl with the hole through it. The N/A 5.4L will clear the stock New Edge hood line with the PI intake and adapter plates....although I'm not sure if it will clear the '96-'98? Either way, as billfisher stated, the PI intake doesn't have the deep breathing characteristics necessary to support the 5.4L volume. Great torque because of the added stroke, but no real increase in horsepower.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jan 19, 2009
#28
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #28
Guys... for the 5.4 swap, it is a pretty good and reasonable swap.

It bolts right in, no need to change the wire harness or anything. The largest mod is to widen your midpipe since the 5.4 is wider.

HPS has released a 4.6 to 5.4 intake that doesn't create the turbulant airflow that the adaptor plates do, and there is a guy that is working very hard to start selling longtubes specific to that swap.

The HP numbers are right around or a little above 4.6 numbers but the tourqe is usually 40-50lb ft. better from what I have read. And like said, with the new Trick Flow heads that will really let that engine take advantage of it's displacement.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 19, 2009
#29
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #29
BurningRubber said:
Guys... for the 5.4 swap, it is a pretty good and reasonable swap.

It bolts right in, no need to change the wire harness or anything. The largest mod is to widen your midpipe since the 5.4 is wider.

HPS has released a 4.6 to 5.4 intake that doesn't create the turbulant airflow that the adaptor plates do, and there is a guy that is working very hard to start selling longtubes specific to that swap.

The HP numbers are right around or a little above 4.6 numbers but the tourqe is usually 40-50lb ft. better from what I have read. And like said, with the new Trick Flow heads that will really let that engine take advantage of it's displacement.
Click to expand...

I don't think the real issue with the PI intake is turbulence created by the adapter plates, it’s the lack of volume in the runners. The small diameter, long running intake set up works well with a smaller displacement 4.6L needing to maintain torque levels, but the 5.4L needs to breath. With the added stroke, torque isn't an issue any longer, so the long runners design isn't necessary (and adapter plates increase the runner length still), and actually constricts things on the top end to an extent. The real problem is that since there isn't enough material for porting, there's nothing that can really be done about increasing their volume and you've essentially got the proverbial "***** in the chain" so to speak.

A short runner intake like a P51 would really wake things up on a 5.4L, but they’re not cheap either and after factoring in the cost of the custom fuel rails needed, you’re over half way to the cost of a blower at that point.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jan 19, 2009
#30
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #30
port velocity reaching the speed of sound ends the whole story.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jan 19, 2009
#31
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #31
Gearbanger 101 said:
I don't think the real issue with the PI intake is turbulence created by the adapter plates, it’s the lack of volume in the runners. The small diameter, long running intake set up works well with a smaller displacement 4.6L needing to maintain torque levels, but the 5.4L needs to breath. With the added stroke, torque isn't an issue any longer, so the long runners design isn't necessary (and adapter plates increase the runner length still), and actually constricts things on the top end to an extent. The real problem is that since there isn't enough material for porting, there's nothing that can really be done about increasing their volume and you've essentially got the proverbial "***** in the chain" so to speak.

A short runner intake like a P51 would really wake things up on a 5.4L, but they’re not cheap either and after factoring in the cost of the custom fuel rails needed, you’re over half way to the cost of a blower at that point.
Click to expand...

Gotcha. Thanks for shedding some light into that...
 

Notchbck93

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
422
1
0
IL
Jan 21, 2009
#32
  • Jan 21, 2009
  • #32
Omars96GT said:
hey guys thanks for the help on the last thread i posted and you all are so right. i will be keeping my GT and it will be leaving the body shop with a cobra front bumper and head lights. Well i want to drop in a 5.0. the NPI 4.6 is way under power with out juice. i want to buy working 5.0 motor and put some gt40 heads, cams, mantifold and a 150 shot. i want to know if its worth it and what do i have to do to make it work.
Click to expand...


Let's start with a project budget before we determine a scope:

What can you realistically afford to spend?

How high would you rate your mechanical skills and the quality of tools in which you have to work with?

This helps others to give realistic advice within your given capabilities.
 

tank_567

Active Member
Mar 19, 2007
731
26
29
Raleigh, Nc
Jan 21, 2009
#33
  • Jan 21, 2009
  • #33
Omars96GT said:
i do not want to invest anymore money into my motor becuase it has over 150000 miles
Click to expand...

I did a pi swap on my old 98 w/ well over 150,000 miles on it and now my brother has that engine and hes put another 20,000 plus on it and its still kicking some ass. MOD motors rule!!
 
O

Omars96GT

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
3
0
0
Jan 21, 2009
#34
  • Jan 21, 2009
  • #34
alright guys thanks for your feed back. about my mechanical skills, well iv been around mustangs sence i was 5 years old so now you know and you wont have to comment something not true. ''this gose out to who ever sead it.'' the reson i dont want to rebuild my motor now is becuase i dont have that much money to spend sense im putting myself throug school. dont get me wrong thank you all so much for your help. iv learned alot and thanks.

my last question is will 99 heads off an expidition will work on my motor?? found a longblock with everything for 150. just want to know if it will work
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 21, 2009
#35
  • Jan 21, 2009
  • #35
Omars96GT said:
alright guys thanks for your feed back. about my mechanical skills, well iv been around mustangs sence i was 5 years old so now you know and you wont have to comment something not true. ''this gose out to who ever sead it.'' the reson i dont want to rebuild my motor now is becuase i dont have that much money to spend sense im putting myself throug school. dont get me wrong thank you all so much for your help. iv learned alot and thanks.

my last question is will 99 heads off an expidition will work on my motor?? found a longblock with everything for 150. just want to know if it will work
Click to expand...

Yes, they'll work but you'll need the valve covers from a '99-'00 Mustang. The Windsor and Romeo covers are different from one and other (11 valve cover bolts (R) vs. 13/14 valve cover bolts (W))...and the truck covers have the oil fill neck on the wrong side.
 
O

Omars96GT

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
3
0
0
Jan 21, 2009
#36
  • Jan 21, 2009
  • #36
thank you sir
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
548
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 10, 2026
Noobz347
Fox Good shop in Washington state or Oregon
  • keel
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
103
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
keel
C
Detroit--swap meets??
  • chazmanaz
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
73
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 4, 2025
chazmanaz
C
M
Misfire
  • Mike3
  • May 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
86
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 30, 2026
Mike3
M
B
Screamin Demons Worth It N/A?
  • Blackout67
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
265
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?