• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Resolved Fuel pressure high at 52 new FPR same thing

  • Thread starter Thread starter afjLX
  • Start date Start date Dec 28, 2024
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
A

afjLX

Member
Nov 16, 2024
83
20
18
DFW,TX
Dec 29, 2024
#21
  • Dec 29, 2024
  • #21
Found The supply line is kinked where it goes from metal to plastic in the engine bay. So where do I get the the plastic tube from to replace it??

unkinked the line and I’m still seeing 50psi.
maybe internal damage to the plastic line is still causing restriction? I will replace and go from there I guess.
 
Last edited: Dec 29, 2024
Reactions: Noobz347
A

afjLX

Member
Nov 16, 2024
83
20
18
DFW,TX
Dec 29, 2024
#22
  • Dec 29, 2024
  • #22
Well, i unkinked the line and still showing 50psi. Maybe internal damage in the plastic line still causing issues? I will replace the line first and go from there I guess.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Dec 29, 2024
#23
  • Dec 29, 2024
  • #23
Look at the entire length of your return line and ensure it's not pinched someplace.
 
Reactions: General karthief
A

afjLX

Member
Nov 16, 2024
83
20
18
DFW,TX
Dec 29, 2024
#24
  • Dec 29, 2024
  • #24
Noobz347 said:
Look at the entire length of your return line and ensure it's not pinched someplace.
Click to expand...
Yeah I did that and don’t see any damage anywhere. Also looked at the hoses near the fuel tank and no kinks. I just removed the schrader valve at the fuel line and noticed what looks like teflon tape on it. I thought Teflon tape was bad for fuel lines as it could break down and clog up fuel systems?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Dec 29, 2024
#25
  • Dec 29, 2024
  • #25
afjLX said:
Yeah I did that and don’t see any damage anywhere. Also looked at the hoses near the fuel tank and no kinks. I just removed the schrader valve at the fuel line and noticed what looks like teflon tape on it. I thought Teflon tape was bad for fuel lines as it could break down and clog up fuel systems?
Click to expand...

For s and grins, disconnect the return line and run a length of hose into a fuel can.

Observe your fuel pressure while this new temp line is connected.
 
Reactions: Mcmahst and nicholase
A

afjLX

Member
Nov 16, 2024
83
20
18
DFW,TX
Dec 29, 2024
#26
  • Dec 29, 2024
  • #26
Noobz347 said:
For s and grins, disconnect the return line and run a length of hose into a fuel can.

Observe your fuel pressure while this new temp line is connected.
Click to expand...

Ok, so I just did this. Disconnected the fuel line at the return line bottom of engine bay where it goes into plastic hose from the fuel rail. Pressure was about 30psi and I was able to adjust it up to 40psi. So we are assuming now there is a clog on the return line downstream towards the tank. Would this be a valid test with it being wide open right at the fuel rail? The path of least resistance is just dumping into the bucket at that point. Should flow be that easy back into the tank? I am definitely leaning towards the cloggged return line.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Dec 29, 2024
#27
  • Dec 29, 2024
  • #27
afjLX said:
Ok, so I just did this. Disconnected the fuel line at the return line bottom of engine bay where it goes into plastic hose from the fuel rail. Pressure was about 30psi and I was able to adjust it up to 40psi. So we are assuming now there is a clog on the return line downstream towards the tank. Would this be a valid test with it being wide open right at the fuel rail? The path of least resistance is just dumping into the bucket at that point. Should flow be that easy back into the tank? I am definitely leaning towards the cloggged return line.
Click to expand...

So long as your temp return line is [after] the fuel regulator then yes... You have a restriction in your return line someplace.
 
Reactions: afjLX

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,914
4,036
183
54
Claremore, OK
Dec 29, 2024
#28
  • Dec 29, 2024
  • #28
Drop the tank. I’ve seen the lines kinked or pinched when someone doesn’t pay attention putting the tank back in.
 
Reactions: afjLX
A

afjLX

Member
Nov 16, 2024
83
20
18
DFW,TX
Dec 29, 2024
#29
  • Dec 29, 2024
  • #29
AeroCoupe said:
Drop the tank. I’ve seen the lines kinked or pinched when someone doesn’t pay attention putting the tank back in.
Click to expand...
I just inspected the lines at the fuel tank and no kinks seen. I will have to look at the hard lines again closely and see if I missed anything. I may disconnect the line at the fuel rail and at the tank and see if I can get air through it.
 
A

afjLX

Member
Nov 16, 2024
83
20
18
DFW,TX
Jan 1, 2025
#30
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • #30
So I disconnected the return line at the fuel rail and dropped the tank and disconnected it at the pump. I inspected the fuel line closely from the engine to the tank and there is zero damage to the line. I blew 120psi of compressed air through the disconnected line and it blew through the no issues. Pulled the fuel pump and checked the return line and it was clear. I did end up pulling off the little rubber backflow duckbill cap/valve off the return line as it looked warped on the tip. I figured I could replace it later and test flow with it off. I reinstalled the pump, tank, and reconnected the lines. Hooked up my pressure gauge and it still reads 50psi. Zero adjustment with the regulator. So now I’m wondering could I have a clog at the injectors and testing it by dumping the fuel at the supply line disconnected was just the path of least resistance, thus allowing me to adjust the FPR.
One thing I will do first. Replace the shrader valve at the supply line test port. It looks old and kinda beat up. I also want to get another pressure gauge for a sanity check. Do this first before I go replacing injectors. Thoughts?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Jan 1, 2025
#31
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • #31
How big is your fuel pump?
 
A

afjLX

Member
Nov 16, 2024
83
20
18
DFW,TX
Jan 1, 2025
#32
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • #32
Update 2

Gonna drop down to a walbro 190. Too much volume for my setup possibly? (Ttickflow heads, e303 cam, cobra intake). Will report back after.
 
Last edited: Jan 2, 2025
A

afjLX

Member
Nov 16, 2024
83
20
18
DFW,TX
Jan 1, 2025
#33
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • #33
Noobz347 said:
How big is your fuel pump?
Click to expand...
Walbro 255

So I’m just now finding out there is a walbro 255 low pressure and a walbro 255 high pressure. The LP is rated at 50psi while the HP is rated at 80psi. I’m wondering if I somehow was sent a HP pump by mistake?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Jan 1, 2025
#34
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • #34
afjLX said:
Walbro 255

So I’m just now finding out there is a walbro 255 low pressure and a walbro 255 high pressure. The LP is rated at 50psi while the HP is rated at 80psi. I’m wondering if I somehow was sent a HP pump by mistake?
Click to expand...

That [should] not make a difference.

I run a 255L HP for my Kenne Bell. 42 lb injectors, stock fuel regulator, lines and rails.

The only difference between the high pressure and low pressure pumps is that the high pressure resists fuel volume reduction at higher pressures.
At stock pressures, there's not real difference.

You're just not using enough fuel to justify the fuel pump and I think it is overrunning your return line.

I might try a smaller pump or running a fatter return line.
 
A

afjLX

Member
Nov 16, 2024
83
20
18
DFW,TX
Jan 1, 2025
#35
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • #35
Noobz347 said:
That [should] not make a difference.

I run a 255L HP for my Kenne Bell. 42 lb injectors, stock fuel regulator, lines and rails.

The only difference between the high pressure and low pressure pumps is that the high pressure resists fuel volume reduction at higher pressures.
At stock pressures, there's not real difference.

You're just not using enough fuel to justify the fuel pump and I think it is overrunning your return line.

I might try a smaller pump or running a fatter return line.
Click to expand...

I have trick flow heads, cobra intake , e303 cam, and 24lb injectors. But no forced induction. I’ve been wondering if the pump is too big for my application. Maybe go down to 190? If I go bigger line how big should I go? Probably easier to just swap out the fuel pump for a smaller unit.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Jan 1, 2025
#36
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • #36
afjLX said:
I have trick flow heads, cobra intake , e303 cam, and 24lb injectors. But no forced induction. I’ve been wondering if the pump is too big for my application. Maybe go down to 190? If I go bigger line how big should I go? Probably easier to just swap out the fuel pump for a smaller unit.
Click to expand...

I agree.

If you take the other route though, I would go one size larger or even run a braided return line.


Both, require dropping the tank so, pick your poison.
 
A

afjLX

Member
Nov 16, 2024
83
20
18
DFW,TX
Jan 1, 2025
#37
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • #37
Noobz347 said:
I agree.

If you take the other route though, I would go one size larger or even run a braided return line.


Both, require dropping the tank so, pick your poison.
Click to expand...

Reading the specs on the walbro 190, I’ve only seen them rated at 50psi. So maybe this is my issue? The 255 HP rated at 80psi is too much for my return lines.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Jan 1, 2025
#38
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • #38
afjLX said:
Reading the specs on the walbro 190, I’ve only seen them rated at 50psi. So maybe this is my issue? The 255 HP rated at 80psi is too much for my return lines.
Click to expand...

That's now how it works.

Both pumps: a 255L low pressure and a 255L high pressure will move the same amount of fuel through the same line at the same voltage and pressure.

Where they differ is when you start running them at higher pressures.

Under the same circumstances, the high pressure pump will out flow the lower pressure pump at 50 psi and even more at 80 psi.

At stock pressures, they will be the same (within tolerance).
 
A

afjLX

Member
Nov 16, 2024
83
20
18
DFW,TX
Jan 1, 2025
#39
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • #39
Noobz347 said:
That's now how it works.

Both pumps: a 255L low pressure and a 255L high pressure will move the same amount of fuel through the same line at the same voltage and pressure.

Where they differ is when you start running them at higher pressures.

Under the same circumstances, the high pressure pump will out flow the lower pressure pump at 50 psi and even more at 80 psi.

At stock pressures, they will be the same (within tolerance).
Click to expand...

So then I should be able to set the fuel pressure with the 255 to 40psi?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Jan 2, 2025
#40
  • Jan 2, 2025
  • #40
afjLX said:
So then I should be able to set the fuel pressure with the 255 to 40psi?
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, no.

In my theory, your engine combo and injectors are not using enough fuel for your return line to accommodate a 255L pump. HP, LP, doesn't matter.

Your solution of a 190L I think is a good one. You need to reduce the volume you're sending to the rails because you're bypassing [too much] fuel at the regulator.


What's your engine combo? NM - I see it: Trickflow and E-303.

That's my theory and I'm sticking to it. A smaller pump should fix this.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
703
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
169
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2026
Mhaley2006
M
I
1994 Cobra - Fuel Pressure Drops Revving at Idle
  • IconicSilverGT500
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
453
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Apr 24, 2026
Mcmahst
Zero fuel pressure @ Shrader, but over 100 PSI at filter
  • Stang337
  • Jul 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
400
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 10, 2025
JD1964
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
146
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?